similar to: Bug#710522: xen-hypervisor-4.1-amd64: Boot hang with Linux 3.2+Xen, works with linux 2.6.32+Xen or 3.2 raw

Hi there, I''m running Xen 3.2.1-rc1-pre on a Ubuntu 8.0.4 server (kernel 2.6.24-19-xen). I have some network cards which are passed through to the DomUs. ''Normally'' everything works quite well. but sometimes when a DomU crashes or has to be shutdown, the pci interrupt of that DomU gets disabled in Dom0. After that happend there is no way (at least I haven''t

Dear folks, We are installing a large diskless cluster using CentOS 5.1. The hardware is pretty new - Supermicro X7DWT boards with Harpertown CPUs. Unfortunately we have some PXE-related problems described by the following scenario: 1) Set up DHCP, TFTP and NFS on a server, prepare PXE kernel and initrd - fine. 2) Start up the node using PXE for the first time - fine. 3) Reboot the node - PXE

Hello List, I'm hoping someone else out there has an Asus DSBF-DE server board, and can tell me if anything special needs to be done to get ports 5 and 6 of the onboard SATA to work under Centos 5.1 x64. I have drives on 1 through 4 that are detected and working properly, however, a drive on 5 is not detected, from what i can tell, the kernel doesn't even see phy's for ports 5 and 6.

Hi ,Guys I installed CentOS5.2-x86_64 on my Dell PowerEndger 1950 with virtualization component ,when reboot the system halted at: /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// Red Hat nash version 5.1.19.6 usb 1-5: device not accepting address 4 ,error -110 usb 1-5: device not accepting address 5, error -110 usb 1-5: device not accepting address 6,error -110 usb 1-5: device not

(lspci-output added at the end of this mail!) Hi specialists, I''m trying to pass an HP Surestore USB-drive to a domU. I''m hiding the pci-device in the dom0, and capturing it in the domU. Although this works fine I receive the following lines in /var/log/syslog of the dom0 after a reboot ======================================================================= Aug 8

Your message dated Fri, 06 Sep 2013 09:09:48 +0100 with message-id <1378454988.3057.2.camel at dagon.hellion.org.uk> and subject line Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#710522: Problem found has caused the Debian Bug report #710522, regarding xen-hypervisor-4.1-amd64: Boot hang with Linux 3.2+Xen, works with linux 2.6.32+Xen or 3.2 raw to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

I have a current RELENG_7 running on: http://www.supermicro.com/products/system/4U/7045/SYS-7045B-TR+.cfm with the -3+ IPMI card. I can interact with the BIOS, etc, but no joy once we get past the loader. Anyone have ideas? Attached is the kernel config, and the /var/run/dmesg.boot file. -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 512-248-2683

̨Íåºê´ó¹ú¼ÊÉÌó¹«Ë¾³ÏÑ°¹óµØºÏ×÷»ï°é£¬ÏúÊÛµçÄÔ¡¢Åä¼þ¡¢ÊÖ»ú¡¢±Ê¼Ç±¾µçÄÔ¡££¨²Î¿¼¼Û¸ñ±íÈçÏ£© ÎÒ˾±£Ö¤²úƷΪȫÐÂÔ­×°,»õµ½¸¶¿î¡£Óв»Ïê¿ÉÀ´ÈËÀ´µç×Éѯ£º ÁªÏµÈË:³ÂÊÀ½Ü µç»°:013850704389 Ò»¡¢Ä¦ÍÐÂÞÀ­ µ¥Î»/Ôª T189--400 T190--350 T191--500 C289--550 T2988--350 A388--1600 A6288--1300 V70--2000 V8088--800 V998++ --700 V60+ --1200 V66+GPRS--950 ŵ»ùÑÇ 3310--400 3330--450

Hello, I´m trying to map one network interface of a Dual-Port e1000 Server Adapter to a DomU (firewall). In Dom0 the adaper is seen with lspci as: 06:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 631xESB/632xESB DPT LAN Controller Copper (rev 01) 06:00.1 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 631xESB/632xESB DPT LAN Controller Copper (rev 01) My goal is to map only 06:00.1 to DomU so I used this

1. Does variable FSB block sizing extend to files larger than record size, concerning the last FSB allocated? In other words, for files larger than 128KB, that utilize more than one full recordsize FSB, will the LAST FSB allocated be ''right-sized'' to fit the remaining data, or will ZFS allocate a full recordsize FSB for the last ''chunk'' of the file? (This is

Hi, I was trying to rebuild world on a FreeBSD 10 test system, that I had just installed. ZFS root was setup. I let the installation program do all the ZFS setup and configuration. I put root on a 5 disk encrypted raidz array. Besides the installer configuring 5 times the amount of swap space I asked for (asked for 8gb, installer put 8gb on each drive, for 40gb in total.) everything was working

Can anyone share their experience with installing RHEL / Centos (latest production release) on the Dell 2950 (or 2900) with the quad-core e5310 processor? Does anyone know what chipset Dell is using on this box? I've got one on the way, and I'm hoping to use centos as the 'host' OS for several virtual machines (some of them Windows pigs), running vmware server. some of the

Hello list, After upgrade to dovecot version 1.2.6 I have noticed some quota malfunctions(users become often overquota). Looking at logs closely I have found that quota value resets to general dovecot-config( quota = maildir:Mailbox quota quota_rule = *:storage=500M quota_rule2 = Trash:storage=10%% ), after dovecot --exec-mail ext /usr/libexec/dovecot/expire-tool.sh command. The problem that

Hello everybody, we recently got three Dell PowerEdge servers equipped with Qlogic QLE2462 cards (dual FC 4Gbps ports) and an EMC CLARiiON CX3-40 SAN. The servers with the FC cards were successfully and extensively tested with an older SUN StorEdge T3 SAN. However, when we connect them to the CX3-40, create and mount a new partition and then do something as simple as "tar -C /san -xf

I'm running CentOS 7.2 and have the following NUT packages installed: nut.x86_64 2.7.2-3.el7 @epel nut-client.x86_64 2.7.2-3.el7 @epel I have it configured based on the instructions in the following page: https://www.luzem.com/2015/01/25/install-ups-in-centos-7/ and it's working except for

I'm looking at deploying a new set of servers based around Intel P4 800MHZ FSB processors. Currently I'm looking at the following 2 motherboards and I'm wondering how well supported they are under -STABLE (specificaly the ATA and LAN as well as text mode video) Model Chipset ASUS P4P8X Intel 865P ASUS P4P800 Intel 865PE Also I'm looking for recommendations on Dual Xeon

This is more an Outlook issue than Dovecot, but given that it is connected to Dovecot I figured there would be a good pool of knowledge here that increases the likelihood that somebody knows the answer :) I have a Dovecot server setup with a public folder and keep getting complaints that Outlook users don't see new folders created by other people. In Thunderbird it is simply a case of

Hi all, I have a following problem: - Remus network buffering doesn''t work. It seems to be because of no vif is reported by the function server.xend.domain on line 29 of /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/xen/remus/vm.py (seen using pdb) : 27 if domid: 28 try: 29 self.dominfo = server.xend.domain(domid, ''all'') >

Update.? Only a single reboot has occurred since changing defalt_vsz_limit from 384M to 512M.? It would seem that something the users are doing is causing that virtual memory size to be exceeded (possibly a mailbox search?), and when that occurs Dovecot/FreeBSD is not handling the event as smoothly as expected. Here's my dmesg for more basic info. Sep 17 11:25:39 romulus syslogd: kernel boot

Just spended ~ hour googling - all boards are based on GC-XX or I750X Chipsets - all for Xeons. There also some boards for Pentium 3. Can someone point me to a board with 64Bit 3.3v PCI for ordinary P4 with 800Mhz FSB. Thanks