similar to: (Somewhat?) Off topic: Containerization software

This is a nice summary addressing the same with R: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1410.0846.pdf On 30 May 2017 at 17:43, Bert Gunter <bgunter.4567 at gmail.com> wrote: > Folks: > > This is **off topic**, but I thought it might be informative to this > community. Consequently: please **no on list public comments or > discussion**. Feel free to respond to me privately, if you like; but

A cursory reading indicates that they are identical; but others more knowledgeable than I need to confirm or deny this. -- Bert Bert Gunter "The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along and sticking things into it." -- Opus (aka Berkeley Breathed in his "Bloom County" comic strip ) On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 3:38 PM, Pius Mwansa <pmwansa at

Always cc the list unless there is good reason to keep your reply private. There is no LSmeans() function in the lsmeans package. Cheers, Bert Bert Gunter "The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along and sticking things into it." -- Opus (aka Berkeley Breathed in his "Bloom County" comic strip ) On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 3:20 PM, Pius Mwansa

It is in the doBy package. Thanks From: Bert Gunter [mailto:bgunter.4567 at gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2018 4:32 PM To: Pius Mwansa <pmwansa at shaw.ca> Cc: R-help <r-help at r-project.org> Subject: Re: [R] LSmeans and lsmeans Always cc the list unless there is good reason to keep your reply private. There is no LSmeans() function in the lsmeans package.

... and if you need to convert back: ?as.hexmode -- Bert Bert Gunter "The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along and sticking things into it." -- Opus (aka Berkeley Breathed in his "Bloom County" comic strip ) On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 8:20 AM, Bert Gunter <bgunter.4567 at gmail.com> wrote: > ?strtoi > > You'll have to remove

A web search on "gradient descent R" also brought up a bunch of stuff. Is any of this what you want? Cheers, Bert Bert Gunter "The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along and sticking things into it." -- Opus (aka Berkeley Breathed in his "Bloom County" comic strip ) On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 10:23 AM, Bert Gunter <bgunter.4567 at

??? IQR returns a single number. > IQR(rnorm(10)) [1] 1.090168 To your 2nd response: "I could have used average, min, max, they all would have returned the same thing., " I can only respond: huh?? Are all your values identical? You really need to provide a small reproducible example as requested by the posting guide -- I certainly don't get it, and I'm done guessing.

Thanks, Jeff. I stand corrected. -- Bert Bert Gunter "The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along and sticking things into it." -- Opus (aka Berkeley Breathed in his "Bloom County" comic strip ) On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 12:22 PM, Jeff Newmiller <jdnewmil at dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote: > R-package-devel is the better venue, as r-packages is

Oh thanks for that clarification Bert! Hope you enjoyed your coffee! I ended up just using the transform argument in the ddply function. It worked and it repeated, then I called a mode function in another call to ddply that summarised. Kinda hacky but oh well! On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 12:31 PM, Bert Gunter <bgunter.4567 at gmail.com> wrote: > ... and I'm getting another cup of

Since these are color strings, you can use functions in the grDevices package (other others) to manipulate them. E.g., you can convert them to various color spaces and perhaps use the mean in one of those spaces as your 'average color'. > myColors <- c(One="#FF7C00",Two="#00BF40",Three="#FFFF00") > col2rgb(myColors) One Two Three red

... and I'm getting another cup of coffee... -- Bert Bert Gunter "The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along and sticking things into it." -- Opus (aka Berkeley Breathed in his "Bloom County" comic strip ) On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Bert Gunter <bgunter.4567 at gmail.com> wrote: > NO NO -- I am wrong! The paste() expression is

If you show us, not just tell us about, a self-contained example someone might show you a non-hacky way of getting the job done. (I don't see an argument to plyr::ddply called 'transform'.) Bill Dunlap TIBCO Software wdunlap tibco.com On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Michael Artz <michaeleartz at gmail.com> wrote: > Oh thanks for that clarification Bert! Hope you enjoyed

Hi, Here is what I am doing notGroupedAll <- ddply(data ,~groupColumn ,summarise ,col1_mean=mean(col1) ,col2_mode=Mode(col2) #Function I wrote for getting the mode shown below ,col3_Range=myIqr(col3) ) groupedAll <- ddply(data ,~groupColumn ,summarise

Well, instead of your functions try: Mode <- function(x) { tabx <- table(x) tabx[which.max(tabx)] } and use R's IQR function instead of yours. ... so I still don't get why you want to return a character string instead of a value for the IQR; and the mode of a sample defined as above is generally a bad estimator of the mode of the distribution. To say more than that would

Again, IQR returns two both a .25 and a .75 value and it failed, which is why I didn't use it before. Also, the first function just returns tha same value repeating. Since they are the same, before the second call, using the mode function is just a way to grab one value. I could have used average, min, max, they all would have returned the same thing. Mike On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 7:24 PM,

Hi, Jumping into this thread mainly on the point of the mode of the distribution, while also supporting Bert's comments below on theory. If the vector 'x' that is being passed to this function is an integer vector, then a tabulation of the integers can yield a 'mode', presuming of course that there is only one unique mode. You may have to decide how you want to handle a

R-package-devel is the better venue, as r-packages is only for announcements. On May 7, 2018 12:17:34 PM PDT, Bert Gunter <bgunter.4567 at gmail.com> wrote: >This is better posted on the R-packages mailing list, not here. > >Cheers, >Bert > >Bert Gunter > >"The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along >and >sticking things into

Did you not notice the conf.type = "none" argument to your survfit call and the associated documentation in the survfit help? -- Bert Bert Gunter "The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along and sticking things into it." -- Opus (aka Berkeley Breathed in his "Bloom County" comic strip ) On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 5:18 PM, Adrian Johnson

Typo: should be NULL not NUL of course An alternative approach closer to your original attempt is to use do.call() to explicitly evaluate the expr argument: w <- "1 + x^2" do.call(curve, list(expr = parse(text = w), ylab ="y")) Cheers, Bert Bert Gunter "The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along and sticking things into it." -- Opus

I think you are missing the point of random forests. But if you just want to predict using the forest, there is a predict() method that you can use. Other than that, I certainly don't understand what you mean. Maybe someone else might. Cheers, Bert Bert Gunter "The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along and sticking things into it." -- Opus (aka