similar to: IGMP

I have a standard 3 interface shorewall setup and I want to receive multicast stuff from ''net'' -> ''loc''. This requires me, first, to do an IGMP join which involves 192.168.1.x -> 224.0.0.x being NATed out as the ''net'' interface''s IP address. Obviously replies have to be NATed back to ''loc'' addresses. Can

I''m rate limiting and prioritizing traffic upstream of a slow wan link using htb, classic wonder shaper type stuff. I''m using the following command for traffic that does not match any of my defined filters: tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 50 It appears that local, non-routable traffic like arps and igmp are being snared by this and end-up queued in the lowest

The testsuite that checks for mcast_max_groups functionality will need to wipe the added groups as well. Add helpers to build an IGMP or MLD packets announcing that host is leaving a given group. Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm at nvidia.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/lib.sh | 50 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+) diff --git

I have a shorewall 2.0.14 running on a single interface machine (nwww in the log below) that is attempting to be well screwed down. The policy file reads:- #SOURCE DEST POLICY LOG LEVEL LIMIT:BURST fw net DROP info net all DROP info # The FOLLOWING POLICY MUST BE LAST all all

Currently we would still potentially suffer multicast packet loss if there is just either an IGMP or an MLD querier: For the former case, we would possibly drop IPv6 multicast packets, for the latter IPv4 ones. This is because we are currently assuming that if either an IGMP or MLD querier is present that the other one is present, too. This patch makes the behaviour and fix added in "bridge:

I am trying to set up my Shorewall box to forward multicast packets to my local net. I do have some problems with mrouted (see below), but I can join and add routes using smcroute. Multicast works when shorewall is disabled. I got a lot of help from the following. http://lists.shorewall.net/pipermail/shorewall-users/2005-January/016674.html I cannot get the multicast packets to pass the fw when

running Version 3.6.23-14.el6_6 I'm having slow save times with folders names ~something.. ie. /www/~bin/content.txt. doing this via a windows share.. when I save file it has a moment (few seconds) of hesitation.. then saves. When I do /www/bin/content.txt. the file saves instantly. Is there anywhere I can change a setting to fix this? or is this a bug. I've looked in the logs

Hi all, Does anyone know of a method of sending a raw G711 stream to an address in Asterisk. For example, an application that takes a argument of a phone and a port. The reason? I have found a method to paging on Zultys ZIP2 and ZIP4x4 handsets. Basically it involves sending a stream of RTP data to port 3771 to multicast address 224.0.0.1. Would it need to involve me writing my

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1079 Bug ID: 1079 Summary: nft-0.6: segfault on add rule ip filter INPUT ip protocol igmp counter accept Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5

Hi All, I have to develop IGMPSnoop application within kernel 2.6. For the same purpose, I would have to Snoop L3 level IGMP packet at L2 level(Bridging level). Can anybody suggests how it can be done. Does Netfilter library support this kind of feature. Thanks In Anticipation Maverick -- _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl

Hi, Is there an IGMP Snooping implementation in development in the bridge module ? Is the bridge module a good place for this feature ? It is better to add it in the module or in user space ? Regards, Nicolas -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/bridge/attachments/20080411/aff8a2cf/attachment.htm

These functions will be helpful for other testsuites as well. Extract them to a common place. Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm at nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch at nvidia.com> --- .../selftests/net/forwarding/bridge_mdb.sh | 49 ------------------- tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/lib.sh | 49 +++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 49

Hi, all! Can I enable multicasting via shorewall? I have router with Gentoo Linux (one interface to ISP, one with alises - to local network). Shorewall work perfect! But now I need setup Quagga (zebra) for dynamic routing between one more router via another provider. All routers daemons (zebra, ripd, ospf) used multicasting. In my configuration already enabled allowBcast and etc.

Hi All, Issue: My Syslog logging doesn''t seem to work for REJECT / DROP policies Context: Shorewall version 1.4.4b on a single IP address setup Diagnosis: Default /etc/shorewall/common.def triggers a DROP prior to policy based -j LOG actions For example selected lines (from the generated iptables) ... The net2all policy: a) -A net2all -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT

Dear List! I use a shorewall 2.0.8 on a Debian sarge system. I use a DSL connection to the Internet (ppp0 - eth1 to the modem) and a bridge to the local lan. The bridged config i''ve made with bridge.html from the shorewall site. The Bridge is between local net and a openvpn tap device. This works. I ccan make tunnels, and a can make a lot of things through the firewall. I can get a list

Hi My situation: I have two pc''s with public ip''s (192.159.56.206(webserver) and 84.196.123.65(mail-gateway)) in the dmz. The firewall (84.196.123.66) is configures with proxyarp, so nothing is changed on the pc''s from when they were not behind the firewall (i.e. they don''t have the firewall as gateway (and they each have different gateways, only 84.196.123.65

Hello, I am using Shorewall version 2.0.1 with kernel 2.4.20. Nightly, LogWatch emails a portion of the logs for my review. I notice that there are tons of dropped packets from port 445, somedays as many as 7,000. See sample below: >From 24.226.192.22 - 2 packets To 24.227.147.124 - 2 packets Service: microsoft-ds (tcp/445) (Shorewall:net2all:DROP:,eth0,none) - 2 packets My question is,

(I''m not a member of the list at the moment so please answer this e-mail CC to my personal address. Thank you all) I am part of a community network in Buenos Aires and I''m now trying to set up a bridge between my local net and the community net. The problem is that appart from the bridge between these I need to share an internet connection and the cable modem assigns me a

Hola and thanks for any help in advance I installed mandrake 9 a few days ago and wanted to set up some additional rules to shorewall, bu i failed :) What i want to do is basicly route any incomming udp and tcp packets on port 4665 to a workstation behind the router. router with mandrake 9, eth0 (192.168.0.1) internal net, eth1(10.0.0.0) connected to dsl modem and gets a dynamic ip

Hi Laine What you have suggested sounds eminently reasonable. Thanks for your advice. I'm going to give it a shot and report back. Richard On 11/27/19 1:38 PM, Laine Stump wrote: > On 11/26/19 11:07 PM, Richard Achmatowicz wrote: >> Hello >> >> I have a problem with attaching VMs to a VLAN interface. >> >> Here is my setup: I have several physical hosts