similar to: scsi drive assignment problem

On CentOS 5, the current centosplus kernel doesn't want to play with the kmod-gfs package (because kmod-gfs wants the stock kernel): # yum install kmod-gfs gives me: Transaction Check Error: package kernel-2.6.18-8.1.14.el5.centos.plus (which is newer than kernel-2.6.18-8.1.14.el5) is already installed Should it work, or is there a separate centosplus build that I've not

Hi everyone, I am trying to do a Cold Migration with Xen, Ubuntu 12.04 and virtual machines with Ubuntu 10.04. This is my cfg file to create the VM on the primary node: # cat ubuntu.c cat: ubuntu.c: Arquivo ou diretório não encontrado root@cloud9:/etc/xen# cat ubuntu.cfg name = "ubuntu" memory = 256 disk = [''phy:/dev/vg_datastore/lv_datastore,xvda,w''] vif = [''

I have an iscsi array that I'd like to mount and share using NFS and I need it to happen without user intervention on a reboot. In the default configuration this doesn't seem to work very well because the iscsi intiator isn't started until after the network is up (obviously) and by that time all local filesystems are mounted. I can't mount the partitions in rc.local because NFS

I have a (CentOS4.5) cluster in which the servers mount a GFS partition which is an LVM2 logical volume created as a mirror of two iSCSI- connected drives (with a third for the log). The LV was created using a command along the lines of: lvcreate -m 1 ... /dev/sdb /dev/sdc /dev/sdd where sd[bc] are the mirrored (iSCSI) PVs in the VG and sdd is the log. I have this working and can write data

hello ! i try to use a network technology on one single host, which wasn`t designed for that. to give a short overview of what i`m talking about: AoE is just like a "networked blockdevice" (just like nbd/enbd) - but without tcp/ip. AoE kernel driver is the "client end" (see this like an iSCSI initiator) - and an etherblade storage appliance is the "server end"

Does opensolaris iSCSI target support SCSI-3 PGR reservation ? My goal is to use the iSCSI LUN created by [1] or [2] as a quorum device for a 3-node suncluster. [1] zfs set shareiscsi=on <storage-pool/zfs volume name> [2] iscsitadm create target ..... Thanks, -- leon This message posted from opensolaris.org

Hi, I''d like to know if there is any way to develop an entire rails app in iPad. Maybe with an app, maybe with an online platform as Cloud9. I''d like to know what you think. Thank you, Rodrigo -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to

From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab at linux-iscsi.org> This QEMU patch sets VirtIOSCSIConfig->max_target=0 for vhost-scsi operation to restrict virtio-scsi LLD guest scanning to max_id=0 (a single target ID instance) when connected to individual tcm_vhost endpoints as requested by Paolo. This ensures that virtio-scsi LLD only attempts to scan target IDs up to VIRTIO_SCSI_MAX_TARGET when

From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab at linux-iscsi.org> This QEMU patch sets VirtIOSCSIConfig->max_target=0 for vhost-scsi operation to restrict virtio-scsi LLD guest scanning to max_id=0 (a single target ID instance) when connected to individual tcm_vhost endpoints as requested by Paolo. This ensures that virtio-scsi LLD only attempts to scan target IDs up to VIRTIO_SCSI_MAX_TARGET when

From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab at linux-iscsi.org> This patch addresses a long-standing bug where the get_user_pages_fast() write parameter used for setting the underlying page table entry permission bits was incorrectly set to write=1 for data_direction=DMA_TO_DEVICE, and passed into get_user_pages_fast() via vhost_scsi_map_iov_to_sgl(). However, this parameter is intended to signal WRITEs

From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab at linux-iscsi.org> This patch addresses a long-standing bug where the get_user_pages_fast() write parameter used for setting the underlying page table entry permission bits was incorrectly set to write=1 for data_direction=DMA_TO_DEVICE, and passed into get_user_pages_fast() via vhost_scsi_map_iov_to_sgl(). However, this parameter is intended to signal WRITEs

Hi all, We are deploying a Linux server and desktops for a customer. We will have the users and groups in LDAP on the server, and files shared via NFS. However, one never knows if Windows desktops will be needed in the future. Is it a good idea to add users with smb-ldap even if samba is not initially used, as adding the samba attributes to an existing LDAP database is painful, and the

There is no CONFIG_SCSI to enable in xenU. Is there any reason for this? I want to try out iSCSI and obviously it needs scsi support. Or would I be better doing it in dom0 and exporting it? thanks James

On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 01:56:59AM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > On Mon, 2014-04-07 at 11:45 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 06, 2014 at 09:32:09PM +0000, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > > > From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab at linux-iscsi.org> > > > > > > This patch updates virtscsi_probe() to setup necessary Scsi_Host > > >

On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 01:56:59AM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > On Mon, 2014-04-07 at 11:45 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 06, 2014 at 09:32:09PM +0000, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > > > From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab at linux-iscsi.org> > > > > > > This patch updates virtscsi_probe() to setup necessary Scsi_Host > > >

From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab at linux-iscsi.org> This patch changes virtio-scsi to use a new virtio_driver->scan() callback so that scsi_scan_host() can be properly invoked once virtio_dev_probe() has set add_status(dev, VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK) to signal active virtio-ring operation, instead of from within virtscsi_probe(). This fixes a bug where SCSI LUN scanning for both

From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab at linux-iscsi.org> This patch changes virtio-scsi to use a new virtio_driver->scan() callback so that scsi_scan_host() can be properly invoked once virtio_dev_probe() has set add_status(dev, VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK) to signal active virtio-ring operation, instead of from within virtscsi_probe(). This fixes a bug where SCSI LUN scanning for both

On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 01:56:59AM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > On Mon, 2014-04-07 at 11:45 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 06, 2014 at 09:32:09PM +0000, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > > > From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab at linux-iscsi.org> > > > > > > This patch updates virtscsi_probe() to setup necessary Scsi_Host > > >

On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 01:56:59AM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > On Mon, 2014-04-07 at 11:45 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 06, 2014 at 09:32:09PM +0000, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > > > From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab at linux-iscsi.org> > > > > > > This patch updates virtscsi_probe() to setup necessary Scsi_Host > > >

The preliminary round voting is completed in the "2005 Readers' Choice Awards" at Linux Journal. CentOS was nominated in the "distribution:" category along with 18 other Linux distros ... and we finished in the top 3 (along with Ubuntu and FedoraCore). Thanks to every one who voted for CentOS. I really did not expect that we would be on the final ballot, though I am