similar to: Mandrake 10 - Shorewall 2.0.3a problem

someone recommended that i should give br0 the same hardware address as eno2. I did that, and restarted the vm, and it still does not work. Here is my current host interface config: ip a 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000 link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo valid_lft

> Dear CentOS-Community, > > we are facing the following issue: > > A secondary ip address seems to be automatically added to a nic which > causes several issues in our setup. Hi, Can you show as the config of eno4? And can you diff the config of eno1 and eno4. Looks like there is a difference somewhere. Regards, Simon > > > This server is equipped with four nics

I should have what i want to achive. The server is intended as a host for VMs. Our network has multiple VLANs, and the VMs will be connected to different VLANS. The interface eno1 is for host traffic and eno2 is connected to the trunk port of the switch, making the different VLANS availabel to the VMs via the br0. I want to use a VLAN-aware br0, so that I specify in my VM config (on the host

Hello All, I'm trying to figure out why xen-utils-common 3.2 doesn't suport bridging on multiple interfaces. I've been digging around /etc/xen/scripts/network-bridges. And modified it so that during boot, when executed the script writes into /tmp/netbr file, but I commented out code that actually creates bridges. I discovered that this script is called three times during boot, I

This is my system info: Debian Release: 10.5 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 5.4.60-1-pve (SMP w/16 CPU cores) Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US:en (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh

I have an access-IProm my isp that I configured my eth0 with. And I also have an IP-range assigned from my ISP that will be used on my servers connected to eth1. The IP-range is routed thru the access-IP. This is how my configfiles look like. Internal everything seems to work but not external. /etc/shorewall/proxyarp #ADDRESS INTERFACE EXTERNAL HAVEROUTE

Hi All, If I have a vlan-Id on an interface with an ipv6 address, then I am unable to ping a real router. The problem is that the Neighbour Solicitation originated from the Centos machine is missing the Vlan-Id in the packet. Therefore a real router will drop such a packet. I have tried this with Centos 4.7 and with Centos 5.5 with the same result. If I originate the first Neighbour

Dear CentOS-Community, we are facing the following issue: A secondary ip address seems to be automatically added to a nic which causes several issues in our setup. This server is equipped with four nics which are currently in use: # nmcli con show NAME????? UUID????????????????????????????????? TYPE????? DEVICE eno2????? cb6fcb54-be52-4ab6-8324-88091a0ea1a0? ethernet? eno2 eno4?????

Hi Parke, Thanks, no I had not run those commands, but after doing so, my VPN address is not visible. See below: nsasia at db2:/etc/tinc$ sudo systemctl enable tinc at VPN1 Created symlink /etc/systemd/system/tinc.service.wants/tinc at VPN1.service → /lib/ systemd/system/tinc at .service. nsasia at db2:/etc/tinc$ systemctl start tinc at VPN1 ==== AUTHENTICATING FOR

Hi all, I have done some tests for the new attributes "check" and "type", could you please help to have a check? And I have some questions about the patch, please help to have a look, Thank you! The questions: 1. in step 4 below, the error message should be updated: Actual results: XML error: invalid mac address **check** value: 'next'. Valid values are

On 12/16/18 4:59 PM, Marc Haber wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to run a network firewall as a VM on a KVM host. There are > ~ 25 VLANs delivered to the KVM host on three dedicated links, no LACP > or other things. I have the VLANs 100-180 on the host's enp1s0, the VLANs > 200-280 on the host's enp2s0 and the VLANs 300-380 on the host's enp3s0. > > To save

Hello all I have weird problem i can't understand and don't know where to look. [root at chamber ~]# ip addr 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000 link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 ::1/128 scope host

Bernd wrote: > > Laine wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: sendmail [mailto:justsendmailnothingelse@gmail.com] On > Behalf Of > > Laine Stump > > Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 4:12 PM > > To: libvirt-users@redhat.com > > Cc: Lentes, Bernd > > Subject: Re: [libvirt-users] still possible to use traditional bridge > > network

Hello all, I am having issues getting my virtual network to work correctly. As of current, I have set up a virtual network with virt-manager, using the routed mode to forward network traffic. I have found guests can see/ping themselves, the host's virtual IP and the host's real IP, but nothing else. Guests fail to see any other device on the real network or the internet. My host is Arch

19. Juli 2017 17:12, c.monty@web.de schrieb: > 19. Juli 2017 16:36, "Michal Privoznik" <mprivozn@redhat.com> schrieb: > >> On 07/19/2017 04:27 PM, c.monty@web.de wrote: >> >>> <snip/> >>> >>> Guest OS is Debian 9 with this network configuration: >>> thomas@vm02-fai:~$ cat /etc/network/interfaces >>> # This

Hello, i want to use docker with ipv6. i install docker and edit the /etc/docker/daemon.json: { "ipv6": true } Message: [root at froodo network-scripts]# systemctl status docker ? docker.service - Docker Application Container Engine Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/docker.service; enabled; vendor preset: disabled) Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Do

Hi, I have been a shorewall user for a long time now, and it has been working flawlessly. I have now changed ISP and my new DSL connection is PPPoE. My setup is as follows: internet <--------> 3com812 Officeconnect (bridge mode) <----> eth0 <-------> linux box <----> eth1, eth2, eth3, eth4 <---> other internal networks Things are working fine, but the link is

Hi folks, I read quite some posts about "Destination host unreachable" problems before, but none could help me to solve my issue. So here we go: This is what I am using: SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 10 SP1 - Current with all updates Network configuration of my dom0: foobar:~ # ip a 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd

Laine wrote: > -----Original Message----- > From: sendmail [mailto:justsendmailnothingelse@gmail.com] On Behalf > Of Laine Stump > Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 3:57 PM > To: libvirt-users@redhat.com > Cc: Lentes, Bernd > Subject: Re: [libvirt-users] still possible to use traditional bridge network > setup ? > > On 03/16/2015 01:07 PM, Lentes, Bernd wrote: > >

Hi, see the log below root at AsteriskSlave:~# ip addr 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 ::1/128 scope host valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 2: p3p1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu