Displaying 20 results from an estimated 8000 matches similar to: "Re: start error]"
2004 Sep 15
15
re: start error
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
The original post was over 300,000kb so I didn''t spam the list with it -TE.
|
|
| Thank you for your quick and helpful response.
|
| I didn''t understand that the virtual interface eth0:1 doesn''t count as
a separate instance from eth0.
| I am sorry to ask for further assistance and would appreciate any
help. The error
2004 Sep 14
1
start error "invalid interface" on shorewall 2.08
I have a dsl modem and two static IP addresses: 66.17.65.22
and 66.17.65.161. I am using the standard configuration from
the Shorewall Setup Guide for multiple IP addresses and
modifications suggested by the Aliased Interfaces Guide.
I want to set up a shorewall 2.08 router for my home (Fedora
Core 2 / kernel 2.6.8-1.521). I want share an internet connection with some pc''son a local
2004 Oct 08
6
clean install with 3 ip addresses
i am doing a clean install on fedora
core 2 using the shorewall rpm and the
Shorewall Setup Guide for multiple
IP''s using a stock configuration except
for AllowDNS and AllowWeb on the
firewall (so i can post this message).
my shorewall status file is attached.
my setup
69.17.65.105 = firewall
69.17.65.22 = dmz server 1
69.17.65.161 = dmz server 2
my local network is
2004 Sep 10
1
Is ProxyARP or NAT entries really neccesary for DNAT to work?
I have been trying to get DNAT to work and I actually have succeeded
too, however, not how I thought it would work when reading through the
documentation.
1. No matter what I do I cannot get DNAT to work unless I have an entry
in eiter the nat or the proxyarp file. Is that really how it''s supposed
to be? I can''t find anything about it in the documentation.
2. Also, in the
2003 Feb 24
5
Bug in Shorewall check?
I made a boo boo in my config and put in this rule
#PPTP
DNAT net:213.67.241.162/217.209.46.204/32
loc:192.168.221.200 tcp 1723
DNAT net:213.67.241.162/32,217.209.46.204/32
loc:192.168.221.200 47 -
And the the following happened.. and I wonder why it didn''t complain? I
am sure I am just misunderstanding some doc
2003 Sep 05
3
Confused about approach
Greetings all,
I''m a bit of a linux rookie, but a friend and I have built a
firewall running Shorewall 1.4.6c over a minimal install of Redhat 9.
Out network setup looks something like this:
Cable Modem : eth0 :12.xxx.xxx.3 (Zone is named INSIGHT)
Campus Lan : eth1 : 10.176.9.21 (Zone is named MULAN)
DMZ : eth2 : 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 (Zone is named DMZ)
Currently, I
2003 Jan 14
3
Shorewall-1.3.13
Just some stuff that was laying around in CVS:
1. Added ''DNAT-'' target.
2. Print policies in ''check'' command.
3. Added CLEAR_TC option.
4. Added SHARED_DIR option.
[teastep@wookie Shorewall]$ cat releasenotes.txt
This is a minor release of Shorewall that has a couple of new features.
New features include:
1) A new ''DNAT-'' action has been
2004 Oct 09
2
odd problem with proxyarp and DNAT
I have some hosts in a DMZ zone with proxyarp. In my local zone I have a host to which I DNAT.
I have discovered that I can reach the host in the local zone by attempting to connect to the fw (As expected) or ANY proxyarped host in my dmz zone (as not expected). Is this normal ?
(I''ve just discovered that actually the dnated host answers to requests sent to any IP routed to my host!)
2008 Oct 01
2
DNAT Issue
Hi.
Im setting up a web farm test lab. I have a number of machines in the
test last on a dmz zone on network 10.20.30.0.
The test lab firewall has two NICS. One (eth0) has two ip addresses,
eth0 10.161.101.40 and eth0:0 10.161.10.49. The other one, eth1 is
on a private network, 10.20.30.0.
I want to use DNAT to allow test engineers to ssh into the machines in
the web farm. I have
2007 Sep 25
1
DNAT PREROUTING issue with iptables
Hi,
I have an DNAT ISSUE with PREROUTING.
This is my setup.
I have 2 firewalls running iptables.
Pls asume 1.2.3.4/29 is the internet interace of FIRST firewall.
2.3.4.5/29 is the internet interface of SECOND firewall. it has DMZ zone. in
that DMZ zone, mail server runnig @ 192.168.100.3
Now I want to DNAT port 25 of FISRT firewall (i.e - its ip address -
1.2.3.4/29) to the internet ip
2011 Apr 15
1
Proxyarp vs DNAT
Hello list,
I am in the process of switching from IPCOP to Shorewall s the firewall
for our small office. I very much like the fact that Shorewall runs on
top of the same OS (openSuSE 11.4) that I run on the server and my desktop.
Our setup is fairly straightforward. We have 8 static ip addresses from
our ISP, which provides a cable modem and a Cisco 800 series router.
The ip addresses are
2004 Aug 22
6
LAN to DMZ zone issues.
Hello all,
Name is Andrew and in desperate need of some info.
Setup:
- Mandrake 9.1 with three interfaces
(eth0 --> WAN) C-class /28 network (with tree virtual addresses which I
am DNAT-ing to the DMZ)
(eth1 --> LAN) A-class 10.0.0.0/8
(eth2 --> DMZ) A-class subnet 10.1.123.0/24
- Running stock Shorewall ver: shorewall-1.3.14-3.1.91mdk
Dilemma:
- LAN can not access the DMZ zone
2003 Oct 21
2
problems
In the last 15 minutes I have had a major firewall running Shorewall display
some problems. This machine has been working fine for the better part of a
year, no changes made in the last week. This machine has three zones. There
is a DNAT running from the net zone and the loc zone to a webserver in the
dmz port 80 only. The DNAT from the loc zone seems to not be working
correctly. If I make a web
2004 Sep 22
3
Strange DNAT problems with shorewall 1.4.8
I''ve had some issues with my network, and I''ve had to reconfigure my
Gibraltar CD. It runs shorewall 1.4.8, and I have a 2-interface setup, so
I downloaded the relevant files from the install page.
Masq and such works, but I''m having a problem with my port forwarding. It
works for port 22, but it doesn''t seem to work for any other port.
I''ve turned
2009 Jun 10
6
Shorewall + IPsec Tunnel
Hi everyone!
First of all, sorry about my bad English and the e-mails extension.
I need some help to implement a VPN connection using shorewall and openswan
as IPSec Tunnel.
My network map:
CLIENT VPN APPLIANCE --> +++INTERNET+++ --> FIREWALL --> OPENSWAN SERVER
(DMZ)
I have two VPN connections with two different subnets to the other end. The
two of then are correctly established.
2005 Apr 27
1
Problems with DNAT
Hi, i''m a shorewall users and i have the following problem:
I have one class C range of IP''s and i have three zones (net, dmz , loc)
I need create one rule to dnat one valid ip address (but not in use in
one computer) to one invalid host in my loc zone.
How i do?
I try this:
DNAT net:200.200.200.200 dmz:200.193.137.38 tcp
137,138,139,445 -
2003 Jan 30
4
ACCEPT vs DNAT
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
Can someone refresh my memory on the difference between the following
(where dmz contains an RFC 1918 address host)?
ACCEPT net dmz tcp 80 - all
DNAT net dmz tcp 80
I''m trying to generate a script for maintaining multiple interconnected
firewalls from shared policy, rules, and zone files, and i
2007 Sep 25
7
DNAT PREROUTING issue with IPTABLES
Hi,
I have an DNAT ISSUE with PREROUTING.
This is my setup.
I have 2 firewalls running iptables.
Pls asume 1.2.3.4/29 is the internet interace of FIRST firewall.
2.3.4.5/29 is the internet interface of SECOND firewall. it has DMZ zone. in
that DMZ zone, mail server runnig @ 192.168.100.3
Now I want to DNAT port 25 of FISRT firewall ( i.e - its ip address -
1.2.3.4/29) to the internet ip
2006 Mar 02
4
Dual ISP routing and NAT problem
Hello newsgroup,
I hope somebody with more routing experience then me can help me with
the problem I have.
The setup is as described below. A dual internet provider routing,
multiple local area networks, and a dmz network with one public and one
private ip range.
I followed the instructions at lartc.org, and so far everything is working.
The default route is via
2004 Oct 11
1
DNAT e.g. port 80 to different hosts
Hi,
just cracking my head how to solve this:
Firewall has more than one public IP Address and NET/LOC/DMZ configured.
Requests on public 1.1.1.2:80 should go to dmz:192.168.0.1:80
Requests on public 1.1.1.3:80 should go to dmz:192.168.0.2:80
How can I manage that with DNAT?
I tried it with the original destination, but keep getting "REFUSED"
always for one connection.
Thx
Andy