similar to: routing between networks on same interface

Hi Tom, Thank you for your quick reply. I aplied changes as you suppose, and now users can comunicate each with others. - thank you very much. I have just one aditional question regarding PKTTYPE=No variable. I didnt find it in shorewall.conf so I simply add it at the end of conf file (above #Last line :-) ) So question is it is standard feature of shorewall, and from which version it is

I am trying to set up somthing so I can dial into my asterisk box, and have it behave as a modem bank. Is there anything like that already, or am I going to have to write my own. I checked googls and found no leads, but thought I would ask here before I tried writing my own, just to make sure I wasnot reinventing the wheel. Thank you in advance for any responses. -Chris

Hi all, I am experimenting with samba 4. I have existing data on NTFS partition and want to share them via samba. But I have problems with permissions (ACL). There is an option: ntvfs handler that tells how mapping of permissions between unix and windows world shall behave. But there is lack of documentation. So I tried posix, simiple but in either case I wasnot able to write even set permissions

How would I setup dovecot so that when messages are moved to the Archive mailbox, they are marked as read? Would it be similar to the imap-sieve for spam tagging? imapsieve_mailbox1_name = Junk imapsieve_mailbox1_causes = COPY imapsieve_mailbox1_before = file:/usr/lib/dovecot/sieve/report-spam.sieve Or is there a simpler method? If it matters: mailbox Archive { auto = subscribe

Hi, In the following function, i hope to save my simulated data into the "result" dataset, but why the final "result" dataset seems not to be generated. #Function simdata<-function (nsim) { result<-matrix(NA,nrow=nsim,ncol=2) colnames(result)<-c("x","y") for (i in 1:nsim) { set.seed(i) result[i,]<- cbind(runif(1),runif(1)) }

Hi, I wrote a machinefunction pass to try to see what's going on. Does it mean that it is target machine dependent pass, like x86? However, after compile it, I found there wasnot command option I registered. I used regular way to do it like RegisterOpt <...> X("... ", "... "), but I cannot see the optimized option when I use opt -load ../../lib/Debug/libxxx.so

Does it not help to add addflag "\\Seen"; to your sieve script code? Cheers tobi ----- Originale Nachricht ----- Von: "@lbutlr" <kremels at kreme.com> Gesendet: 12.05.18 - 08:55 An: dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> Betreff: Marks as read on mover to Archive > How would I setup dovecot so that when messages are moved to the Archive mailbox, they are marked

On Tue, 19 Oct 2004, Zhang Qiuyu wrote: > I wrote a machinefunction pass to try to see what's going on. Does it > mean that it is target machine dependent pass, like x86? However, after > compile it, I found there wasnot command option I registered. I used > regular way to do it like RegisterOpt <...> X("... ", "... "), but I > cannot see the optimized

hey guys, wanna know where to find my graphics card driver for centos5.5 coz the 5.4 support it and xserver start automaticly but the 5.5 doesnot start and tried to reconfigure the xorg.conf but it doesnot work too. and i noticed that the hardware prob process find a different driver for my card . mine is arrandle.intel! my system is a dell studio laptop 1569! thnx in advance -------------- next

hi@all I have the following problem: With asterisk 1.09 the grandstream's registers fine with both ports, with version 1.2.1 (the newest port on freebsd) I get "Unauthorized" SIP messages from the 2nd port. The ports are configured identically, the only difference is the sip and rtp port. On the first port the sip port is 5060 on the second 5062. The rtp on the first 5004 on the

Dear Sir, I have point-point ethernet connections to my linux boxes on which I am running Zebra OSPFD. I am unable to understand the output of the tcpdump. Please clarify the terms in the output. The output of the command tcpdump on BOX 1 is as follows: I have also shown a part of my network below. 14:0831.849801 eth0 M 192.168.2.2 > 224.0.0.5: OSPF v2-hello 48: rtrid 192.168.4.2 backbone

What shorewall rules would be required to allow the OSPF routing protocol to pass fw<->loc? Any suggestions would be appreciated. Ben

The same client was used for syslinux.efi (both success on same subnet and failure on different subnet) and grub.efi. The DHCP host block is setup like: host testing { hardware ethernet {mac} ; next-server 10.16.195.178 ; filename "rhel64/syslinux.efi" ; } I'll pull a tcpdump filtering by the IP tomorrow when I get back to the systems. On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 6:41 PM,

I'm not trying to build Wine on my system, only to extract enough files so I can define my own version of an edit control -- the one built into Windows does too much in one area and not enough in another, and subclassing doesn't solve the problem. I've identified the file I need (\dlls\user32\edit.c) and can find the associated include files, however I can't find

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2005:850 imap security update for CentOS 3 x86_64: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-850.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: updates/x86_64/RPMS/imap-2002d-12.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/imap-devel-2002d-12.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/imap-utils-2002d-12.x86_64.rpm source:

Dear list, I''m running Shorewall on a dedicated Fedora 7 box. Shorewall is working well as an office DSL router (dynamic IP) with loc and dmz zones. I am now trying to configure IPSec to connect a VPS, "casp", with a static IP to both the firewall and to the loc network behind it. The host to host SA works fine. However, pings from "loc" to "casp" can be

Op 2013-11-04 om 20:26 schreef Jason Matthews: > The same client was used for syslinux.efi (both success on same subnet and > failure on different subnet) and grub.efi. The DHCP host block is setup > like: > > host testing { > hardware ethernet {mac} ; > next-server 10.16.195.178 ; > filename "rhel64/syslinux.efi" ; > } > > I'll pull a

Would someone please explain to me the difference in effect between the following two IPTABLES conditions and the significance thereof in concurrent connection limiting? --tcp-flags SYN,ACK,FIN,RST SYN -j REJECT \ --connlimit-above 3 --connlimit-mask 32 --state NEW -j REJECT \ --connlimit-above 3 --connlimit-mask 32 -- *** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** Do

Hello, I am using fitdistr function for parameter estimation. When I use fd<-fitdistr(V2,"gamma") I get following error: Error in optim(x = c(0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, : initial value in 'vmmin' is not finite fd<-fitdistr(V2,"weibull") Error in optim(x = c(0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, :

Hi all: It takes more than 10 seconds to create a vm on a Dell R830 machine, but it takes less than 2 seconds on other machines. This is not normal, so I turned on the debug log for libvirtd. I analyzed the log and found that the time was spent on libvirtd calling qemu. Thread 95225 calls the qemuProcessLaunch interface at 14:22:30.129 and then builds the emulator command line, but the