similar to: Traffic shapping Bug ?

This is a minor release of Shorewall. WARNING: This release introduces incompatibilities with prior releases. See http://www.shorewall.net/upgrade_issues.htm. Changes are: a) There is now a new NONE policy specifiable in /etc/shorewall/policy. This policy will cause Shorewall to assume that there will never be any traffic between the source and destination zones. b) Shorewall no longer

I am getting the following message when Shorewall stops can anybody shed any light on this message and where I should be looking? Thanks root@bobshost:~# shorewall stop Loading /usr/share/shorewall/functions... Processing /etc/shorewall/params ... Processing /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf... Loading Modules... Stopping Shorewall...Processing /etc/shorewall/stop ... IP Forwarding Enabled

Dear list members, Masquerading does''not work for me. This is a Mandrake Linux 10 system, but I use another kernel, that included in the original distribution (original: 2.6.3, now used 2.6.8 because of a lot of suck with OpenSwan with kernels prior 2.6.4). The problem seems to be similar or identical mentioned here:

HI all, I'm new to R. Say I have a multi-layered list called newlist. ############ > str(newlist) List of 2 $ :List of 5 ..$ : num [1:8088] NA 464 482 535 557 ... ..$ : num [1:8088, 1:2] NA 464 482 535 557 ... ..$ : num [1:8088, 1:3] NA 464 482 535 557 ... ..$ : num [1:8088, 1:4] NA 464 482 535 557 ... ..$ : num [1:8088, 1:5] NA 464 482 535 557 ... $ :List of 3 ..$ : num

Hi, I have a default class for my un-marked traffic (prio 5) and a prio 0 class for the important stuff, but I do not understand why my download traffic is duplicated in both. It work fine for my upload traffic (same setting except the red class but I have the same result if I create an esfq instead). Any comments/information will be appreciated. Below my config : tc commands from my scirpt :

Hello! # I have a list with several data frames: mylist<-list(data.frame(a=1:2,b=2:3), data.frame(a=3:4,b=5:6),data.frame(a=7:8,b=9:10)) (mylist) # I want to grab only one specific column from each list element neededcolumns<-c(1,2,0) # number of the column I need from each element of the list # Below, I am doing it using a loop: newlist<-NULL for(i in 1:length(mylist) ) {

like this, the list is below, I want to remove the last one . not using newlist[-2], but using the function detect its component is numeric(0) and then remove it from the list. newlist [[1]] [1] 2 3 [[2]] [1] numeric(0) [[3]] [1] 7 [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hello all, Maybe I'm being thick, but I was trying to figure out a simple way to create a list with the same dimension of another list, but populated with NA values. masterlist = list( aa=list( a=matrix(rnorm(100),10,10), b=matrix(rnorm(130),13,10), c=matrix(rnorm(140),14,10)), bb=list(

my list al is as below: mylist=list(c(2,3),5,7) > mylist [[1]] [1] 2 3 [[2]] [1] 5 [[3]] [1] 7 How could I get the following FOUR lists: First one [[1]] [1] 3 [[2]] [1] 5 [[3]] [1] 7 Second one [[1]] [1] 2 [[2]] [1] 5 [[3]] [1] 7 Third One [[1]] [1] 2 3 [[2]] [1] 7 Last one [[1]] [1] 2 3 [[2]] [1] 5 Do I have to use 'for' loops? Please give me sone suggestions! Thank you

I have a list containing 48 objects (each with 30 rows and 4 columns, all numeric), and wish to produce 4 boxplot series (with 48 plots in each) , one for each column of each object. Basically I want a boxplot from boxplot(mylist[[]][,i]) for i in 1:4. It seems that I can create a boxplot of length 48 from the entire list, but I don't seem able to subscript to return 4 boxplots from the list

Attached please find unified diffs against Samba 2.0.6. I'm hoping that others will find it useful and that it may even find its way into Samba 2.0.7 This patch does two things: - Modifies the handling of the 'netbios name' parameter so that standard_sub_basic() is run on its value when the 'netbios name' parameter is processed. This has to be done this way because

Hi all, I have the following code: set.seed(1) x1 <- matrix(sample(1:12), ncol=3) x2 <- matrix(sample(1:12), ncol=3) x3 <- matrix(sample(1:12), ncol=3) X <- list(x1,x2,x3) tt <- matrix(round(runif(5*4),2), ncol=4) Is there a way I can construct a new list where newlist[[i]] = tt[i,] %*% X[[i]] without using a for loop? Each element of newlist will be 3 x 1 vector. Thanks -- Tina

Hello, thank you all for your patience and time I am essentially trying to get disorganised data into long form for linear modelling. I have 2 dataframes "rec" and "book" Each row in "book" needs to be pasted onto the end of several of the rows of "rec" according to two variables in the row:" MRN" and "COURSE" which match. I have

I would like to use grep and gsub to manipulate a vector to make the names used consistent, i.e. reduce a level or two. However, here is what I found when I attempted to use grep and gsub: > tmp_test<-c("House 1 Plot Plus +100","House 2 Plot Plus +100","House 3 Plot Plus -100","House 4 Plot Plus -100","House 1 Plus +100","House 2

Hi all, I was trying to test ROUTE specific code with a multi-isp serviced box. There is a bug somewhere, but I''m not able to understand what the real problem is: when I issue a "shorewall show capabilities" I get: Loading /usr/share/shorewall/functions... Processing /etc/shorewall/params ... Processing /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf... Loading Modules... Shorewall has

I am trying to continuously evaluate online created data files using R-algorithms. Is there any simple way to let R iteratively check for new files in a given directory, load them and process them? Any help would be highly appreciated. Best, A. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi, I installed the shorewall 1.3.8-2 debian package to my debian testing machine which serves as the gateway to the internet. Since I have two other machine connect to internet thru this gateway machine, I also downloaded the configuration guide for "basic two-interface firewall" and followed the instructions. When I try to start the shorewall I get the following message and can not

Hi! It''s me again bothering you guys, what I want to do is to give full bandwidth to VPN traffic and limit the rest to 30KB/s (kilobytespersecond), ok? Here''s what I have: tcclasses ################################## eth0 1 1kbps 70kbps 1 eth0 2 1kbps 30kbps 2 default eth1 3 15kbps 10000kbps 1 eth1 4

Hi, This question should be simple to answer. I am a new R user. I have a data.frame called appended. I would like to break it into 7 smaller datasets based on the value of a categorical variable dp (which has values 1:7). I would like to name the smaller datasets set1, set2, set3,....,set7. I don't know how to refer to the variable in the for loop, when naming the output datasets. In STATA

It seems to me that ipsecnat tunnel type is not complete. Latest drafts of ipsec nat-traversal use udp port 4500 for nat-traversal communications. (It''s called port floating). That is needed to get rid of ugly ipsec passthru devices. Now ipsecnat opens port udp/500 from any source port. And I think ipsecnat won''t work at all with gw zone defined? I''m not sure about