similar to: tzdata update, but no announcement?

i (and others) have missed messages on centos-devel as well. did other people not see the 4.7 announcement message? i'm wondering if the centos list server is having some kind of issue.

after this latest centos 5 kernel update, i am seeing 40 second delays on automount points. nothing in the rpm changelog looks obviously related to autofs and the autofs module seems to be the same as the previous kernel. i'm starting to do some strace'ing and other debugging, but nothing has jumped out at me yet. i'm hoping someone else has seen it so i know i'm not alone

Just popped back on the list because I was curious about this. I've read the information about virtualization and other new features. I'm just wondering (as someone who installed CentOS 2 years ago and basically hasn't thought much about it my OS other than using it since then) if any piece of it except for virtualization got updated significantly enough to consider an upgrade. My

while in firefox if i use arrow keys in text fields, it acts very oddly. starting at the beginning of the line it works fine for a few characters and then jumps to the end of the line. backarrow jumps backwards from the end of line to within a few chars of the beginning. anyone else seeing this?

sorry i figured this out after deleting the other parts of the thread. just run vino-preferences as the user who runs the main x display. it will have various options to enable and as soon as you do that you can get to hostname:0 via vnc. works quite well.

i've downloaded the new 2.6.9-34 kernel src rpm and keep getting signature issues or md5 issues if i tell rpm to ignore signatures. it seems that maybe the master copy is corrupted?

there doesn't seem to be a src.rpm for the newest kernel up on mirror.centos.org. i need to apply a local patch. is it the same as the upstream version? also, the centosplus unsupported version is either missing the -doc package or people need to know to do some manual intervention to get the regular version to replace the old unsupported version.

redhat did apply the opendesktop patch to build the iso8859-1 fonts, but then they forgot to rebuild the fonts-xorg package to pick them up. they have done some magic with how that happens such that you have to build the full xorg-x11 with a special %define set, and then go rpm2cpio stuff and tar that and blah blah blah. i am trying to work through this and i have whined at redhat again. and

the rsync in centos 4 (a recompile of rhel4) is version 2.6.3. and under certain circumstances it will segfault when run in daemon mode. i have tracked it down to the nss code in libc. so this could be a general libc bug, but it is possible that rsync is doing things that don't help matters any. the problem manifests when you have chroot mode on (which seems to be the default), have

Sorry for the extra info required, but I had digest mode turned on and wouldn't have received the mailing till tomorrow. I have since updated the data manually, but after 'yum update tzdata' was run, the zdump -v for EST5EDT and America/New_York all still showed a date of April 1, instead of March 11. After manually fixing, it is correct. This was mostly a question about why yum

I might be stupid and ask an idiot or offensive question, but here it is: "Why was tzdata-2007h [RHEA-2007:0928-05] only released for CentOS 2, when upstream has released it for all the versions?" The guys from X/OS have released it for 5.0 along with the other updates (on Oct. 9). Are the "enhancements"... "not important" as long as they're not "security

I read a few days back on the list where the tzdata rpm was to take care of the new DST rules. I run CentOS 3 servers, and did a 'yum update tzdata' , but received a 2006a update of the rpm. Is this proper? It sure didn't fix anything. Thanks Steve Campbell campbell at cnpapers.com Charleston Newspapers

hey all, I perused my inbox looking for this subject, but not finding it, -anything I need to keep my server farm of 60 centos servers (that all run ntp) going smoothly during this next time change on March 11? I noticed on the w2k side my IT staff have to do some scrambling, heh, but that's expected. Any action required? -karlski

I am installed CENTOS 5.5 on X86. After finish, I tried to apply latest patches. Rpm patch manager say need "dependency" "tzdata-java-20101-1.e15". I search CENTOS 5.5 CD and can NOT find this file. I also search Internet and no result. Can anyone tell me where to download "tzdata-java-20101-1.e15" RPM? Thanks.

Previously the packages were built 6 Dec 2022 published 13 Dec 2022. Now the download packages are rebuilt 30 Mar 2023 published 03 Apr 2023. http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/updates/x86_64/Packages/tzdata-2022g-1.el7.noarch.rpm http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/updates/x86_64/Packages/tzdata-java-2022g-1.el7.noarch.rpm Why would a previously published package be re-published with different

I don't see the tzdata updates for 2006m in the centos 3 mirrors ?!? http://mirror.centos.org/centos-3/3/updates/i386/RPMS/ its here for centos4... http://mirror.centos.org/centos-4/4/updates/i386/RPMS/tzdata-2006m-3.el4.noarch.rpm and here for 2.1, http://mirror.centos.org/centos-2/updates/noarch/tzdata-2006m-3.el2_1.noarch.rpm so where is it for centos3 ?!? my RHN connected RHEL3 system

Hi! It appears that there have been some changes to tzdata recently. We run an application that needs the server to stay at GMT. Previously, we used the Casablanca timezone but now there seems to be a 1 hour difference to GMT. I checked the London zone and they seem to change time too. I tried to change the zone to GMT with system-config-date (i'm using command line remotely) but

Hi All, I guess this is a political question rather than technical. New Zealand is probably extending daylight saving time with a bill currently being drafted. It will (most likely) change the end data of dst by pushing it out ~3 weeks. My question; AFAIK CentOS/whitebox/et. al. should not make any changes to tzdata - it is an upstream issue, but how do we ensure that 'upstream'

Peter Eckel wrote: > Hi all, > > I know this comes from upstream (and most likely from the rsyslog project itself), but what's your opinion about Google Ads in system documentation files? > >> [peckel at mucnvjmppmtr01 ~]$ cat /etc/redhat-release >> Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.7 (Santiago) >> [peckel at mucnvjmppmtr01 ~]$ grep google

Hi list. Does "yum update tzdata" update /etc/localtime or does this need to be done manually? [this is part of the hwclock problem, a guy from sage-au has given me a hint] Jobst -- Keyboard not found - please clean up desktop! | |0| | Jobst Schmalenbach, jobst at barrett.com.au, General Manager | | |0| Barrett Consulting Group P/L & The Meditation Room P/L |0|0|0|