similar to: Re: VPN/ipsec naming of interfaces

class wrote on 06/10/2004 11:18:48: > Hello, I have the following situation: > > 192.168.176.0/24 ------ A ========== B ------ 192.168.177.0/24 > 192.168.176.2 pop3 ipsec > racoon > > > policy: (Machine A and B) > ------- > loc vpn ACCEPT > vpn loc ACCEPT > all

class wrote on 06/10/2004 11:18:48: > Hello, I have the following situation: > > 192.168.176.0/24 ------ A ========== B ------ 192.168.177.0/24 > 192.168.176.2 pop3 ipsec > racoon > > > policy: (Machine A and B) > ------- > loc vpn ACCEPT > vpn loc ACCEPT > all

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 claas@rootdir.de wrote: > Hello, > > > > #--- file: policy --- > #vpn policies: > loc vpn ACCEPT info > fw vpn ACCEPT info > vpn loc ACCEPT info > vpn fw ACCEPT info > > net

Hi, same for me. The screen does not freeze anymore and the boot succeeds. But now I have this kernel message during boot (for the second card): [ 24.382045] pci_pm_runtime_suspend(): nouveau_pmops_runtime_suspend+0x0/0xe0 [nouveau] returns -22 Do you want to have the complete dmesg log? I think this is a new bug. Your patch works for the previous one, so you can close it. Yours, Claas On

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 claas@rootdir.de wrote: > I am using kernel 2.6.6 native ipsec with racoon and shorewall 2.1.9 > in production for one week now. I just want to tell you that it seems > to run stable here. > > I am going to extend my setup to a 3 gateway setup soon. > Afterwards I will try to also get roadwarriors in. > I will report on that

I'm trying to figure out if a file has changed since the last rsync call. I use the following command line: rsync -cvv /mnt/xxx/vol1/dbase/100/kunden.dbf /mnt/label | grep "^total: " | sed -e 's/.* data=//' This gives a 0 if the file is unchanged and the file size if the file has changed. Adding the "dry-run" option "n" to the command line always

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 claas@rootdir.de wrote: > Hello, > > > I am trying to get ipsec with kernel 2.6.8.1 and shorewall 2.1.9 running, > but I still have a problem: > > Validating hosts file... > Error: Your kernel and/or iptables does not not support policy match: ipsec > > I had a look for netfilter patch-o-matic, but I did not find the

There appear to be a crop of new hardware where the vbios is not available from PROM/PRAMIN, but there is a valid _ROM method in ACPI. The data read from PCIROM almost invariably contains invalid instructions (still has the x86 opcodes), which makes this a low-risk way to try to obtain a valid vbios image. Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76475 Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75511 Priority: medium Bug ID: 75511 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: Screen freezes during boot with an 3.13 kernel (Arch Linux) QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified OS: Linux (All)

On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 7:53 AM, Claas Lorenz <cllorenz at uni-potsdam.de> wrote: > Hi, same for me. The screen does not freeze anymore and the boot Great! And that's without the nouveau.config=NvBios= stuff that you added as a workaround, right? > succeeds. But now I have this kernel message during boot (for the second > card): > > [ 24.382045]

Hello, I am using shorewall 2.2.3-1 and ipsec-tools-0.5.2 on the same machine. My kernel 2.6.11.10 is patched as needed. The server has an official IP-Adress (no NAT on this side), but some of the clients do use NAT. I figured out that NAT-T connections (RFC 3947) did not work without the "generic:udp:4500" in /etc/shorewall/tunnels: # Road-Warriors ipsecnat net

I have tested this patch. I can confirm that now nouveau loads correctly without errors. Thank you 2014-03-27 0:37 GMT+01:00 Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu>: > There appear to be a crop of new hardware where the vbios is not > available from PROM/PRAMIN, but there is a valid _ROM method in ACPI. > The data read from PCIROM almost invariably contains invalid > instructions

I'm trying to rsync a smb filesystem to a novell netware filesystem. Both file systems are mounted on a debian woody system (from root). On both file systems the rsync process has "root" file system rights. But trying to rsync a file with a read only flag like -r-xr-xr-x 1 root root 3441648 Jan 20 1998 WEBCLIENT.EXE to the novell filesystem gives this error: rename

Ok, I give up. I tried, really hard, before asking but I must be the most stupid shorewall user on the planet :( My laptop runs a single eth0 interface and knows Net and Firewall as zones and the default "inbound" policies are Net->Any DROP and >ny->Any REJECT. Now at home I have my trusted 192.168.174.240/29 subnet which hosts my very trusted 192.168.174.242 host and I

Hi all, I tried to produce some kriged surfaces with geoR (latest version). The size of the grid should be around 900 x 650 cells (what I find is not a very big grid), and the number of points is around 2500. The command krige.conv stopped after arround 5 min saying it can not allocate a vector with around 1.5 billion units. Sounds reasonable. Is there a workaround? How would I partition the

A few general comments about stepwiseAIC and a suggestion of how to select models a) Apart form the problem, that stepwise selection is not a garanty to get the best model, you need to have a lot of data to avoid overfitting if your model includes 7 parameter plus interactions (> 10 observations per parameter is what you are ideally looking for). b) Have a look at Anderson and Burnham's

Hi, Summary of problem: Local mail on the firewall stopped working after installing shorewall Background yesterday I installed shorewall, based on the debian package from www.backports.org (which seems to be a 2.0.3 package) on an otherwise virgin debian woody set up. Configuration was done based on the two-interface setup. Kernel is 2.6.8.1 unpatched. A 2.4.23 kernel, with

It is with regret that I announce that Shorewall development and support is officially ended. Sean''s post has finally driven it home to me that in the long term, trying to support a project like Shorewall is impossible for a person of my personality and age. Sean -- please believe that this isn''t about you or your post -- your post was just the proverbial straw on this old