Displaying 20 results from an estimated 11000 matches similar to: "Problem with local email after shorewall installation"
2004 Oct 28
2
VOIP
In advance sorry for my english.
I''m just starting to use shorewall-1.2.0 and i would like to know how could i do to manage the voice over ip?
Someone have already do it?
which port i will have to keep open? like for the RTP...
thanks
2003 Mar 23
12
Shorewall 1.4.1
This is a minor release of Shorewall.
WARNING: This release introduces incompatibilities with prior releases.
See http://www.shorewall.net/upgrade_issues.htm.
Changes are:
a) There is now a new NONE policy specifiable in
/etc/shorewall/policy. This policy will cause Shorewall to assume that
there will never be any traffic between the source and destination
zones.
b) Shorewall no longer
2004 Oct 11
5
Intermittant Samba glitch
Hi there,
Let me just start by saying that I am a bit of a Linux newbie, but that Shorewall seems an excellant product. The issue I''m reporting wont stop me from using it, it still does 99% of what I need.
Anyway, I have a resonably simple two interface system. My server (HatMannz, P3-900MHz with a RAID-1 array of 80GB IDE drives running Red Hat 9.0) connects to a cable modem via eth1
2004 Dec 25
5
Thick head still having problems with subnets (?)
I have defined a Home zone and placed it before the Net zone. Defined a
host 192.168.174.242 as a trusted host. Now if I ping from 242 to my fw
it works just fine (also tweaked the norfc1918 file).
Thing I do not understand is why if I try pinging or FTPing from FW to
242 I hit the all2all reject rule !
I tried reading the rules and from the INPUT chain I see a eth0_in chain
which in turn
2002 May 30
3
eDonkey and Shorewall
Hi everybody!
I''m very happy with shorewall, seems to safe my computer well, a little
bit to well. But i''m sure it''s a mistake of mine:
I can''t get edonkey working! They say that edonkey needs the following
ports enabled:
4665 udp in / out
3665,4665,7665,8665 udp out
4661,4662,4666 tcp in
thats what i wrote in the rules file:
ACCEPT fw net
2005 May 25
9
Newbie going through a probably stupid thing
Believe me:
Read the FAQ
Checked over and over
This might be toooooo stupid to be documented.
Please bear with me. Any help ?
Situation: single card standalone "firewall" (used like a "personal
firewall"). Have sshd running on the FW. Want the sshd daemon to be
accessible only from 2 LANs:
1) My other home LAN machine
2) IBM intranet machines (9.0.0.0)
Whatever I have
2003 Jan 06
5
SMTP traffic gets blocked
Hi,
I am trying to configure the SMTP service on DMZ host. Added the rule:
ACCEPT wan dmz:66.58.99.84 tcp pop3 -
ACCEPT wan dmz:66.58.99.84 tcp 25 -
ACCEPT dmz:66.58.99.84 wan tcp 25 -
ACCEPT dmz:66.58.99.84 wan tcp pop3 -
issued shorewall clear, shorewall restart, but still couldn''t telnet to
the mail server
2014 Nov 26
3
2.2.15: SMTP submission server?
On 17/11/2014 07:23, Ron Leach wrote:
> On 16/11/2014 07:24, Robert Schetterer wrote (re-ordered):
>> Am 16.11.2014 um 02:24 schrieb Reindl Harald:
>>
>>> * if you find a security issue in postfix running
>>> on 587 over TLS cry out loud
>
> I'm thinking beyond that; I want to get to the position that when
> there is an issue in the MTA, our
2005 Jan 08
8
Shorewall problem, perhaps with PPPoE
I have what strikes me as an odd problem with shorewall.
Let me describe my setup.
My desktop (alfred) is connected to the network
through an ADSL modem.
I am running rp-pppoe, and this works perfectly.
I have a small home network, with two LANs;
an Ethernet LAN (including a machine running Windows XP),
and a WiFi LAN, including the laptop (william) I am using now.
All the computers except for
2006 Feb 12
11
Local Network Can't Get Past Shorewall to the Internet
Greetings all,
I have just install Shorewall on a Debian system and
I''m using it as a firewall on an internal network.
The specifics of the system are as follows:
firewall:/var/log# shorewall version
3.0.4
firewall:/var/log# uname -a
Linux firewall 2.6.12-1-386 #1 Tue Sep 27 12:41:08 JST
2005 i586 GNU/Linux
Shorewall start successfully and $FW can connect to
the Internet for upgrading
2004 Oct 05
6
Something Changed?
Problem:
"Firewall" machine cannot get DNS but is allowing DNS through internally.
Something changed with the configuration but we''re not sure what. Here is
the pertinent info:
Shorewall Status Entries
Oct 5 09:24:50 all2all:REJECT:IN= OUT=eth2 SRC=192.168.7.55
DST=65.175.131.201 LEN=55 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=50982 DF PROTO=UDP
SPT=32973 DPT=53 LEN=35
Oct 5
2005 Jun 24
6
Is it that difficult?
Hello,
You will find in attachment the layout of my
current physical configuration.
For now, the Cable ISP is not used. Since it
is a dynamic ISP, my mailserver is rejected and
my domain name registers on blacklists like ORDB
and al.
I want it to be used as a default gateway except
for my mail server that would be seen as coming
from my "honest" ADSL ISP.
Here is
2002 Feb 07
9
X windows
How would i allow xwindows and xdmcp through would it be ACCEPT net -> fw all 117
and
ACCEPT net -> fw all 6000:6100
?
and for that matter how would i stop x traffic from leaving the fw machine?
REJECT fw -> net all 6000:6100
?
2004 Nov 04
3
Spamc not working
2003 Jan 04
2
Another Inquiry
In the same test environment that I mentioned in my previous message I set
up a caching DNS server.
When I ran named I noticed in the message log a whole string of log messages
saying that the DNS requests to the root servers had been rejected by the
default
all2all policy. Presumably this is the policy
all all REJECT info
that is at the end of the default policy file. I have put in the DNS
2003 Aug 31
4
linux-ha heartbeat .. failover firewall
I have searched your FAQ''s and read the documentation on your site as well
as googling. I am not able to figure this out. If you have any ideas can
you please help.
I am using the linux-ha failover with redundant firewalls.
As part of the function of the linux-ha software consists a service called
heartbeat which is a connection from each failover node through a serial
cable or ethernet.
2002 Oct 12
2
logs analise
My logs show thats:
A internal client search my proxy
(192.168.0.3)
Oct 12 12:40:33 massayo kernel:
Shorewall:all2all:REJECT:IN=3Deth1 OUT=3D
MAC=3D00:e0:7d:82:0f:fe:00:04:75:99:28:63:08:00
SRC=3D192.168.0.215 DST=3D192.168.0.3
LEN=3D63 TOS=3D0x00 PREC=3D0x00 TTL=3D128
ID=3D25902 PROTO=3DUDP SPT=3D3028 DPT=3D53 LEN=3D43
Why OUT is empty?
From: Server (DMZ)
Oct 12 12:40:34 massayo kernel:
2005 Jan 25
3
masc and multicast
I am trying to set up my Shorewall box to forward multicast packets to
my local net. I do have some problems with mrouted (see below), but I
can join and add routes using smcroute. Multicast works when shorewall
is disabled. I got a lot of help from the following.
http://lists.shorewall.net/pipermail/shorewall-users/2005-January/016674.html
I cannot get the multicast packets to pass the fw when
2006 Jan 28
3
Shorewall/Xen setup (correct from-address this time)
(if this post gets line-feed-mangled please read
http://www.dl.reneschmidt.de/shorewallxenpost.txt - that''s an unmangled
version, thank you)
Hello,
first I would like to thank the Mr. Eastep and contributors for this great piece
of software and superb documentation.
I have a SOHO server (Debian testing) that I''m using for several purposes so
I''ve set up a Xen
2006 Mar 06
7
LVS-DR + Shorewall Upgrade 3.0.2 -> 3.0.4 => Trouble
Hello,
after upgrading Shorewall (see subject) and Gentoo-Linux (from Kernel 2.6.12
to 2.6.15, both with Gentoo patches, e.g. not Vanilla) the firewall on our
load balancer rejects HTTP packets for the VIP with
>Mar 5 23:22:51 balance Shorewall:all2all:REJECT:IN= OUT=eth0
>SRC=XX.XXX.XXX.XXX >DST=XXX.XXX.XXX. XXX LEN=48 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=114
>ID=26421 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=2025