similar to: SNAT is less expensive than MASQ

Hi! Progress is much better now with my new install with not many problems left! I just have a simple - I hope - question. I have a few users that need access to the net via masquerade rules. The rest have to go via squid on the firewall. That all works well. I also have two windows servers that also need access to the net but they have to each use a specific outgoing ip address. I add two

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9 ------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2006-09-16 14:45 MET ------- I guess this is obsolete now that we don't exclude locally originating packets from MASQUERADE anymore .. in the end all ports will be unique. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are

More than one of our docs issues revolve around some confusion between "IP masquerading" and "SNAT" -- a confusion I might share, or if contagious, I may be catching. <g> I think of SNAT more or less as a special case of IP masquerading, applicable when, for example, the external interface has multiple IP''s and you choose to _explicitly_ set the address through

I have a dual-homed firewall. It has 2 Internet connections, provided by different ISPs (each with an associated IP address). The 2 Internet connections are connected to the same physical interface. The 2 Internet connections do NOT have equal bandwidth How do I configure the SNAT/MASQ and ensure sharing of the gateways with the correct ratio of usage and with the correct source IP address? I

I get the error below when trying to build clang with expensive checks. Works fine w/o these. Is this a known problem? This is on Ubuntu Hardy using this compiler: regehr at john-home:~$ g++ --version g++ (GCC) 4.2.4 (Ubuntu 4.2.4-1ubuntu4) Thanks, John Regehr make[4]: Entering directory `/home/regehr/z/tmp/llvm-r80385/tools/clang/lib/Basic' llvm[4]: Compiling Builtins.cpp for

Hi John, > I get the error below when trying to build clang with expensive checks. > Works fine w/o these. Is this a known problem? this is a bug in libstdc++, and has been fixed here: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=147599 If you can't pick up the fix, try compiling clang without the -fno-rtti option. Ciao, Duncan.

Hmmm, this used to work, at least it didn't on Aug 07 on x86_64: http://google1.osuosl.org:8011/builders/clang-x86_64-linux-check - Daniel On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Duncan Sands<baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hi John, > >> I get the error below when trying to build clang with expensive checks. >>   Works fine w/o these.  Is this a known problem? > >

On 2009-08-29 01:37, Daniel Dunbar wrote: > Hmmm, this used to work, at least it didn't on Aug 07 on x86_64: > http://google1.osuosl.org:8011/builders/clang-x86_64-linux-check > > -fno-rtti wasn't used in the build of clang, it started being used in the build after a Makefile fix: Author: Eric Christopher <echristo at apple.com> Date: Tue Aug 18 03:23:40 2009

I am trying to build 2.7 on FreeBSD with all debugging options "on": CXX=/usr/local/gcc/4.5.0/bin/g++ CPPFLAGS=-I/usr/local/include LDFLAGS=-L/usr/local/lib ../llvm/configure --prefix=/usr/local/llvm/2.7 --enable-assertions --enable-shared --enable-libffi --enable-debug-runtime --enable-expensive-checks --enable-debug-symbols Here is the error message I got from the build:

On 07/29/2013 03:18 AM, Sven Verdoolaege wrote: > On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 04:42:25PM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: >> Sven: In terms of making the behaviour of isl easier to understand, >> it may make sense to fail/assert in case operands have parameters that >> are named identical, but that refer to different pointer values. > > No, you are allowed to have different

Hi, I've been browsing for FXO devices, and I'm really surprised at their costs. Why such devices are so expensive and somehow hard to get ? Samy. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20030805/a92ee327/attachment.htm

Hi, is it just me, or are the VoIP providers for Germany more expensive than going via call-by-call? sipgate.de lists a price of 1.76ct a minute, a couple of call-by-calls are listed at 1.3ct-1.5ct a minute. Did anyone else thought this to be strange? What about other countries? Same thing?! It seems to me, VoIP providers only make sense for headquarter to subsidiary, but not for regular

Hi I am writing some functionality for a multivariate PDF. One problem is that evaluating the normalizing constant (NC) is massively computationally intensive [one recent example took 4 hours and bigger examples would take much much longer] and it would be good allow for this in the design of the package somehow. For example, the likelihood function doesn't need the NC but (eg) the

I never did see this get to the list. Tim Litwiller wrote: > For my church school we need a way to connect 3 room phones, 1 office > phone and 2 phone lines. > so I need a device or several that i can connect to 2 pots phone lines > and at least 3 plain old wall phones. I'll donate a sipura 941 for > the office. > > What would be the best product to get 2 fxo ports

On 07/25/2013 09:01 PM, Star Tan wrote: > Hi Sebastian, > > > Recently, I found the "Polly - Calculate dependences" pass would lead to significant compile-time overhead when compiling some loop-intensive source code. Tobias told me you found similar problem as follows: > http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=14240 > > > My evaluation shows that "Polly -

Hi, so just to verify the obvious: these are both the same type of build (Release-Asserts, or whatever) rather than an optimized 3.1 vs a 3.3 debug build? (I know this is unlikely, but I've managed to mix-up my configurations in the past so it is worth checking before trying more involved options). A 20x slow-down that looks to be on everything (rather than one component) is a strong symptom

Hello everyone. I've got a HFC ISDN card that I'm using with chan_misdn and it basically behaves like crap. Echo is waaay worst then echo I get TDM400 card, sound is "choppy" (there other side is allays complaining about sound interruptions) and to top it all it detects fake DTMF's all the time. Is this a chan_misdn problem or is it a card problem? I really need to get

At 2013-07-26 14:14:51,"Tobias Grosser" <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: >On 07/25/2013 09:01 PM, Star Tan wrote: >> Hi Sebastian, >> >> >> Recently, I found the "Polly - Calculate dependences" pass would lead to significant compile-time overhead when compiling some loop-intensive source code. Tobias told me you found similar problem as follows:

Hi, I was wondering if there was a way to store the results of a computationally expensive "getter" call on an S4 object, so that it is only calculated once for each object. Trivial example: let's say I want to cache the "expensive" area calculation of a square object. setClass("Square", representation( length='numeric',

Just like the subject sais - how expensive is it to execute a lot of these commands to keep track of different things in asterisk? I have avoided doing this because it feels a bit like a risk to spam the asterisk CLI this way, but is it really? CPU-wise it doesn't seem very expensive to do it 100 times a second (from a simple test I did), but is it possible it will affect the asterisk