similar to: norfc1918, routefilter and routestopped

Hello all, Yesterday I noticed that my system was "leaking" traffic towards the 10/8 network, I have shorewall installed on multiple machines ranging from single interface devices to ones with 10+ interfaces. I tested all the boxes and they are showing the same behavior. All systems are CentOS 3.4, 2.4.21-27.0.2.ELsmp. Shorewall version: 2.2.1 For the host mentioned is a single

I''ve had some issues with my network, and I''ve had to reconfigure my Gibraltar CD. It runs shorewall 1.4.8, and I have a 2-interface setup, so I downloaded the relevant files from the install page. Masq and such works, but I''m having a problem with my port forwarding. It works for port 22, but it doesn''t seem to work for any other port. I''ve turned

Hello Tom, I''ve been using Shorewall for years without problems. My previous version of shorewall was 1.4.6b-1. Everything worked just fine. Today I upgraded using rpm to 2.0.8-1. After update no one can connect to any interface from net. Server can connect to outside world fine and those described in routestopped have no problem connecting. Any help correcting this problem would be

I have a three interface network (net,loc,dmz). The internet interface (eth0) has a static IP. Windows machine in the local network (eth1) use DHCP to get IPs from the 192.168.10.0/24 netblock. The Debian machine in the DMZ (eth2) gets a fixed IP through DHCP in the 192.168.11.0/24 netblock. The DHCP server is running on the firewall machine (not ideal, I know, but that''s the way

Hello , The folllowing is the error problem: Validating interfaces file... ERROR: The ''norfc1918'' option may not be specified on an interface with an RFC 1918 address. Interface:eth2 The shorewall interface file: net eth2 detect tcpflags,routefilter,norfc1918,nosmurfs,logmartians P.S. I tried to remove norfc1918 from interface

Hello, I believe there may be a bug in shorewall version 2.0.8. I''ve been using shorewall for years without problems (last installed version was 1.4.6b-1). I''ve posted previously with the subject line "After upgrade people can no longer connect" dated on Sunday, September 19, 2004 which contains all the information for the upgrade. Today I uninstalled shorewall

Tom, or whomever reads this, when I say disconnect I mean close out IE6, sorry for so unclear on this point. My IP address never changes unless I unplug the modem. I have had the same IP address for ... well since I had to reset it to hook it up to my Linux box.which was 2 weeks ago. If I set DHCP on my eth1 interface that will contradict the static address I have assigned to it,

I get this enabling the option "routestopped" in my interface (eth0, net, one interface): Failed to apply configuration : Compiling... Compiling /etc/shorewall/zones... Compiling /etc/shorewall/interfaces... ERROR: Invalid Interface option (routestopped) : /etc/shorewall/interfaces (line 11) Means that routestopped don''tt work, is it? Then, what could i do? Thank you very

Hi. I set, for example, a rule with a host server: Macro.http accept fw net:www.google.es I restart shorewall and it works, but when i stop the firewall for disabling Internet (for any reason), and i want start the firewall it says: Failed to start firewall : Compiling... Compiling /etc/shorewall/zones... Compiling /etc/shorewall/interfaces... WARNING: Support for the detectnets interface

Hi. I set, for example, a rule with a host server: Macro.http accept fw net:www.google.es I restart shorewall and it works, but when i stop the firewall for disabling Internet (for any reason), and i want start the firewall it says: Failed to start firewall : Compiling... Compiling /etc/shorewall/zones... Compiling /etc/shorewall/interfaces... WARNING: Support for the detectnets interface

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello I try to setup a bridge firewall base on http://shorewall.net/bridge.html I''m using shorewall-1.4.10g-1. I doublecheck on /etc/shorewall/routestopped file on my firewall, and there is no "OPTIONS" options. Should I use different shorewall version ? Thanks -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

Another bug with similar symptoms to the last one has been found by Renato Tirol. The bug fixed by the earlier errata update affects the following options: dhcp dropunclean logunclean norfc1918 routefilter multi filterping noping The bug reported by Renato and fixed in the current errata update affects: routestopped The new update is available at:

Rafa³ Dutko has just discovered a potentially serious bug in version 1.3.0 and 1.3.1. In both versions, where an interface option appears on multiple interfaces, the option may only be applied to the first interface on which it appears. A corrected firewall script for 1.3.1 is available at: http://www.shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/errata/1.3.1/firewall and

Hi, I''m trying to use Shorewall (3.0.6) to accomplish what I thought was going to be fairly simple. Unfortunately, I can''t get the dmz to work correctly, and I''m getting martians logged against the interface at issue. Any help I could get would be greatly appreciated! A picture of my physical setup is attached. I have also attached a shorewall dump. To make a long

Hi there, Let me just start by saying that I am a bit of a Linux newbie, but that Shorewall seems an excellant product. The issue I''m reporting wont stop me from using it, it still does 99% of what I need. Anyway, I have a resonably simple two interface system. My server (HatMannz, P3-900MHz with a RAID-1 array of 80GB IDE drives running Red Hat 9.0) connects to a cable modem via eth1

Hi I had this problem that shorewall blocks all traffic from net when norfc1918 rule is given to my eth0 (net ethernet card). I''ve added: run_iptables -I rfc1918 -s 192.168.7.10 -j ACCEPT To start file but that didn''t help. My configuration: ADSL modem has static 10.***.***.*** ip address to net (ISP does NAT conversion) and my modem does Nat conversion and my firewall eth0

Hi, I have a Linux firewall based on shorewall with 2 NIC and ADSL (ppp0). My ppp0 ip is fixed. The internal NIC, eth1, is bridged with tap0, tap1 and tap2 to form br0. br0 subnet is 192.168.2.0/24. The firewall is configured to masq internal traffic and block whatever needs to be blocked. It is also configured to tunnel openvpn v1.6. I have a roaming laptop running XP. I can create a tunnel

I have been using shorewall and freeswan successfully for 3 or more years now. But they have all been using the Linux 2.4 kernel. My current configuration is (as the title suggests) using SuSE 9.1 which has a 2.6.5 kernel and freeswan 2.0.4 built-in. After much reading and a lot of trial and error, I did get this combination to work with Shorewall 2.0.9. It is happily talking to an older Mandrake

I have a dsl modem and two static IP addresses: 66.17.65.22 and 66.17.65.161. I am using the standard configuration from the Shorewall Setup Guide for multiple IP addresses and modifications suggested by the Aliased Interfaces Guide. I want to set up a shorewall 2.08 router for my home (Fedora Core 2 / kernel 2.6.8-1.521). I want share an internet connection with some pc''son a local

Hello, My server is on Mandrake 10.1 off. eth0 is WAN with static IP connected 512 DSL eth1 is LAN. My default shorewall settings are : Source zone Destination zone Policy Syslog level Traffic limit loc net ACCEPT None None fw net ACCEPT None None net Any