Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "Building R-3.2.0 from source."
2015 May 10
1
[R] Building R-3.2.0 from source.
I am cross-posting this to r-sig-fedora (I hope that's not an egregious
sin) in the hope that doing so might provide some source of insight.
I tried
sudo yum install zlib
and was told
> Package zlib-1.2.5-7.fc17.x86_64 already installed and latest version
Likewise for "zlib-devel".
I also tried
sudo yum install bzlib
and was told
> No package bzlib
2015 May 11
1
[R] Building R-3.2.0 from source.
On 11/05/15 12:06, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
> 1. R 3.2.0 is packaged for Fedora now; it's in Rawhide and Fedora 22.
> I'm running Fedora 22 (late beta) and haven't had any problems with R.
> RStudio Desktop Preview (0.99.435) from the RStudio Fedora RPM is also
> running fine. You might save yourself some hassles by upgrading to
> Fedora 22.
I'm sure I would,
2015 May 11
3
[R] Building R-3.2.0 from source.
I just landed in Paris, and haven't read backwards in this thread, but I've done 3.2.0 builds for all current Fedora releases, they're all in updates-testing (I think the Fedora 22 builds are in updates stable now).
The thing that changed is that R doesn't bundle a number of libraries like it used to. This doesn't affect the official Fedora R package, since we never used the
2015 May 11
0
[R] Building R-3.2.0 from source.
1. R 3.2.0 is packaged for Fedora now; it's in Rawhide and Fedora 22.
I'm running Fedora 22 (late beta) and haven't had any problems with R.
RStudio Desktop Preview (0.99.435) from the RStudio Fedora RPM is also
running fine. You might save yourself some hassles by upgrading to
Fedora 22.
2. I have a bash script to build R from source that works on Fedora
22. It probably also works on
2015 May 11
0
[R] Building R-3.2.0 from source.
On 11/05/15 16:19, Tom Callaway wrote:
> I just landed in Paris, and haven't read backwards in this thread,
> but I've done 3.2.0 builds for all current Fedora releases, they're
> all in updates-testing (I think the Fedora 22 builds are in updates
> stable now).
>
> The thing that changed is that R doesn't bundle a number of libraries
> like it used to. This
2007 Jan 30
1
Solaris 10 compilation issue
I am trying to compile R-2.4.1 in 64-bit on Solaris 10 running on AMD
hardware. I am trying to do this with Sun Studio 11.
My config.site looks like this:
#! /bin/sh
AR="/usr/ccs/bin/ar"
TEX="/usr/local/teTeX/bin/i386-pc-solaris2.10/tex"
LATEX="/usr/local/teTeX/bin/i386-pc-solaris2.10/latex"
PDFTEX="/usr/local/teTeX/bin/i386-pc-solaris2.10/pdftex"
2007 Jan 30
1
Difficulty with compiling R-2.4.1 on solaris 10
I am trying to compile R-2.4.1 in 64-bit on Solaris 10 running on AMD
hardware. I am trying to do this with Sun Studio 11.
My config.site looks like this:
#! /bin/sh
AR="/usr/ccs/bin/ar"
TEX="/usr/local/teTeX/bin/i386-pc-solaris2.10/tex"
LATEX="/usr/local/teTeX/bin/i386-pc-solaris2.10/latex"
PDFTEX="/usr/local/teTeX/bin/i386-pc-solaris2.10/pdftex"
2018 Mar 31
1
using llvm DataFlowSanitizer error
Hi. I'm using llvm DataFlowSanitizer. I add such code in library libtiff.
dfsan_label lt_label = dfsan_create_label("buf_offset", 0);
dfsan_set_label(lt_label, (unsigned char *)buf, size);
But when i compile libtiff with "-fsanitize=dataflow" option, then there is an error as follows:
../libtiff/libtiff.so.5.2.5: undefined reference to `dfs$jbg_enc_init'
2019 Jan 22
1
[PATCH] fix build failure when CONFIG_KLIBC_ZLIB is not set
When CONFIG_KLIBC_ZLIB is not set, related functions
shall not be called otherwise build failure is encountered:
KLIBCLD usr/kinit/static/kinit
usr/kinit/ramdisk_load.o: In function `load_ramdisk_compressed':
/root/ldb_base/ofl/packages/klibc/usr/kinit/ramdisk_load.c:68: undefined reference to `inflateInit2_'
/root/ldb_base/ofl/packages/klibc/usr/kinit/ramdisk_load.c:116: undefined
2010 Jun 15
1
libldb-samba.so does not link in source4 samba
I am building in source4. Where are these symbols defined? Is any
library that is not getting linked?
samba/source4 # make
WAF_MAKE=1 ../buildtools/bin/waf build
Waf: Entering directory `/usr/src/bamba/samba/source4/bin'
[1816/1961] Linking default/source4/lib/ldb/libldb-samba4.so
[1908/1961] Linking default/source4/lib/ldb/ldbadd
default/source4/lib/ldb/libldb-samba4.so: undefined
2023 Feb 24
1
[PATCH 0/1] ZSTD compression support for OpenSSH
I added ZSTD support to OpenSSH roughly three years ago and I've been
playing with it ever since.
The nice part is that ZSTD achieves reasonable compression (like zlib)
but consumes little CPU so it is unlikely that compression becomes the
bottle neck of a transfer. The compression overhead (CPU) is negligible
even when uncompressed data is tunneled over the SSH connection (SOCKS
proxy, port
2023 Feb 24
1
[PATCH 1/1] Add support for ZSTD compression
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian at breakpoint.cc>
The "zstd at breakpoint.cc" compression algorithm enables ZSTD based
compression as defined in RFC8478. The compression is delayed until the
server sends the SSH_MSG_USERAUTH_SUCCESS which is the same time as with
the "zlib at openssh.com" method.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian at
2002 Jan 30
1
Patch: update zlib/* to 1.1.3
This patch (apologies for the size) updates zlib/* to the files that ship with
zlib 1.1.3.
Index: zlib/ChangeLog
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/rsync/zlib/ChangeLog,v
retrieving revision 1.1
diff -u -r1.1 ChangeLog
--- zlib/ChangeLog 7 May 1998 06:19:41 -0000 1.1
+++ zlib/ChangeLog 30 Jan 2002 01:12:41 -0000
@@ -1,6 +1,54 @@
ChangeLog
2001 Nov 02
1
png and jpeg libs for Solaris
I'm also having trouble installing R 1.3.1 on Solaris and getting png
and jpeg support.
It looks like perhaps the png and jpeg libraries I installed weren't
built with all the support R needs.
If that's the case I'd appreciate confirmation. Or perhaps there's
something else I can do?
(with all the details I've included this message is rather long)
Thanks
-Don
I did
2017 Jun 22
1
Compiling R-devel - missing some expected features (zlib, bzlib, lzma, PCRE)
Hi All,
I am compiling R-devel on Linux (Ubuntu 16.04.2) and that works just fine, but I am missing some of the expected features, as shown here:
https://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-devel/R-admin.html#Linux
In particular, after configure (using all defaults), I see:
R is now configured for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
[...]
Interfaces supported: X11
External libraries:
2000 Feb 28
3
Rinst.exe question
Hi all,
I'm using R0.99a on WinNT4. I downloaded a bunch of packages and tried
using Rinst.exe to install them. For whatever reason, Rinst.exe does not
find all the packages I downloaded. I put all files in the same temp
directory, but Rinst only finds some of them. I have no problem installing
the rest with WinZip, but if Rinst works it would be much easier (don't have
to run WinZip
2015 Nov 04
2
Building R for AIX in 64-bit mode
On 2015-10-15 15:02, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> On 15/10/2015 13:32, Michael Felt wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> Just wanted to let you know I am getting close to packaging R for AIX in
>> 64.bit mode.
>
> Which version? (You mentioned 3.1.3 and 3.2.2 far below.) There is
> little value in reporting on frozen branches, and most value in
> reporting on R-devel where
2020 Mar 24
4
ZSTD compression support for OpenSSH
I hacked zstd support into OpenSSH a while ago and just started to clean
it up in the recent days. The cleanup includes configuration support
among other things that I did not have.
During testing I noticed the following differences compared to zlib:
- highly interactive shell output (as in refreshed at a _very_ high
rate) may result in higher bandwidth compared to zlib. Since zstd is
quicker
2005 Nov 24
1
Windows R CMD build <pkg> leftovers
A command
R CMD build <pkg>
that fails, e.g., because of C code compilation errors, leaves a
directory %TMPDIR%/Rinst.xxx containing the file R.css. Although R
CMD INSTALL --build cleans up after itself, build does not. A fix is
below. Also, build.in references Rcmd.exe, which I thought was no
longer necessary?
Index: build.in
2017 May 08
2
2.2 -git fails to compile as of Apr 28 2017
On 2017-05-08 16:23, Reuben Farrelly wrote:
>
>
> On 8/05/2017 9:13 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2017-05-08 13:52, Reuben Farrelly wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Following up on this as there has been no response and the problem
>>> is still present. As this is the master-2.2 branch I would have
>>> thought it would compile