similar to: Windows Update and DMZ

Does anybody know of any commercial providers of IAX termination with DIDs in the Seattle, WA area? I believe the area codes are: 425, 206, 253 Failing any commercial providers, is there anybody in the seattle area running Asterisk with a PRI coming in who might be willing to sell me an IAX trunk with a DID in Seattle? -- ____________________________________________________________ Muiz

I am experiencing choppy sound when I bridge from a SIP peer to an IAX peer. I am running Asterisk 1.4.13 on a 2.6.22.9 kernel (Fedora). I am experiencing choppy sound from the SIP peer to the IAX peer but not vice-versa. I know that this is not a bandwidth issue because I don't have choppy sound (with the same codec) when bridging IAX->IAX peers or SIP->SIP peers. My timing source is

I understand that the Asterisk SLA implementation is somewhat different from most key systems and PBX systems. I also understand that in Asterisk, one does not put an SLA line on hold since it is just a MeetMe conference. However, is there any way to make the BLF flash when the answering party on the Asterisk system presses the hold key on their set and leaves the calling party alone in the

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 This message was incorrectly discarded by Mailman -- I''m still looking for the cause. - -Tom |On Mon, 08 Nov 2004 14:17:17 -0800 |> "Muiz Motani" <muiz@i-dist.com> wrote: |> | |>> > Has anybody found an elegant way to solve this problem? I am sure that I |>> > am not the only one who has run into

Does anybody know what happened to the opencall.org website? I can't get into the home page or the ftp site.

I am using IAX soft clients (firefly, IAXComm, IAXPhone) from a Win2K machine on a NATed private LAN to connect to my IAXTel account. All of my calls to outside numbers(1-800, 1-877, etc) seem to be disconnected after 9 seconds. Has this limit been placed on IAXTel? My call to the echo test number at 1-700-999-9613 seemed to run for as long as I wanted. --

How would I use Big Brother with Shorewall and my loc and dmz zones to monitor hosts in both zones? If Big Brother''s server is on my LAN (loc) is it "safe" to forward the bb port from the dmz to the LAN? What would the security risks of this be? Common sense says that it may not be a good idea to forward stuff from the dmz to the LAN, but I''m inexperienced and unsure

I have a three interface network (net,loc,dmz). The internet interface (eth0) has a static IP. Windows machine in the local network (eth1) use DHCP to get IPs from the 192.168.10.0/24 netblock. The Debian machine in the DMZ (eth2) gets a fixed IP through DHCP in the 192.168.11.0/24 netblock. The DHCP server is running on the firewall machine (not ideal, I know, but that''s the way

I am trying to add a machine into my dmz. It is the first machine I''ve ever added to this dmz and fro some reason I cannot establish communication between the dmz and the machine. Here is an example of my setup: ISP router --> firewall (eth0) firewall (eth1) --> local network firewall (eth2) --> DMZ eth0 and eth2 have public IP addresses as does the machine I just added to

I am not quite sure if this issue relates to iptables, routing or Xen virtual machines. Too many variables for my simple mind, so I'm asking some advice :) This is my network setup: Internet --- eth2 + CentOS dom0 / firewall / router + eth1 (xenbr1) --- LAN with private IPs --- separate file server and workstations + eth0 (xenbr0)

Hi, in a three interface firewall I have eth0, loc, 10.1.5.1/16 eth1, int, 200.41.61.228/29 eth2, dmz, 192.168.1.1/24 (un)fortunately I got a group of public ip?s to use, so here is my problem in the dmz I have 192.168.1.3 redirected from eth1 alias 200.41.61.226 (a web server, works perfect). I am trying to set up a mail server also, a different machine, so I can?t use proxyarp, as with this,

hello there, im running a 3interface inet, dmz, loc. i have some public ip addresses. one public address is the router of the provider, the second one is the linux box running shorewall. all other public interfaces are on the dmz nic with proxy-arp. now whenever i do a traceroute (the dmz boxes are windows, icmp traceroute) the very first hop gets timeout/stars, then the router of the provider

There is such a wealth of knowledge and personal experience on this list that I'd like to get your opinions on our current situation. Currently, we have a simple tri-homed firewall with the internal network on one interface, the dmz on another, and the dirty internet on the last. Also, there is a spare interface on the box which is unused. We use CentOS and manually maintain our rule sets

Hi everyone, Sorry for asking OT here, but I need your expertise :-) I am running a standard 3 I/F net, dmz, loc Shorewall 1.4.7 on a RH 9 server In the DMZ I have a web shop running with DNAT from the external address to the DMZ - this all works I want to add a develop server in the DMZ with external access so I set this up as per the live server and from internal network it works, but from

Hello !! I ve just install shorewall-common and shorewall-shell I can''t defined a network using the CIDR format for my DMZ in /etc/shorewall/hosts fast eth2:172.17.0.0/16 epac eth2:172.18.0.0/16 fsa eth2:172.19.0.0/16 bu eth2:172.20.0.0/16 recto eth2:172.21.0.0/16 dmz eth1:81.91.225.224/27 I receive this error: ERROR: Invalid zone definition for

Hi everyone, I have a question regarding the default gateway for hosts on DMZ zone. I moved servers from parallel to the DMZ (outside the firewall, directly connected to I-net) to inside DMZ. The default gw for these servers was the DSL router(bridge) of my ISP. What should be the default gw (for the hosts inside the DMZ), when hosts are inside the DMZ now - still the DSL router (external

Hi all, I am running Xen 3.0.2-2 (taken from XenSource) with Linux kernel 2.6.16 (taken from Debian Sid), I compiled Xen and 2 kernels (dom0 and domU). Here is the ascii-art of my setup: ------------ ------------- | LAN |------------------------| waste | 192.168.0.94/24 ------------ ------------- | ·····························

Hi! I am looking to choose a condom based on its pleasure score. I received some summarised data from 10 individuals: structure(list(Ramses = c(4, 4, 5, 5, 6, 3, 4, 4, 3, 4), Sheiks = c(5, 5, 6, 4, 7, 6, 4, 5, 6, 3), Trojans = c(7, 8, 7, 9, 6, 3, 2, 2, 2, 3), Unnamed = c(2, 1, 1, 3, 3, 4, 5, 4, 4, 3)), .Names = c("Ramses", "Sheiks", "Trojans", "Unnamed"),

>Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2004 14:57:27 +0200 >To: shorewall-users@lists.shorewall.net >From: Alberto Starosta <alberto@starosta.org> >Subject: Two servers HTTP on DMZ > >Hi all. >This is my first post at this list. > >I''ve installed SHOREWALL and work well foe me. Thxs. > >I have one problem. >I have two HTTP servers (both work with 80 port). in my