similar to: bug report for make check

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "bug report for make check"

2020 Oct 30
1
bug report for make check
Thanks, I'm going to shut up then. Despite having been reported multiple times, it was not at all clear to me that this was being worked on with the intention of addressing make check - that is one of the limitations of the communication system we use. Best, Kasper On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 11:38 AM Tomas Kalibera <tomas.kalibera at gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Kasper, > > if you
2020 Oct 02
2
timezone tests and R-devel
Yes, the potential issue I see is that make check fails when I explicitly set TZ. However, I set it to be the same as what the system reports when I login. Details: The system (RHEL) I am working on has $ strings /etc/localtime | tail -n 1 EST5EDT,M3.2.0,M11.1.0 $ date +%Z EDT $ echo $TZ US/Eastern On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 9:48 AM Sebastian Meyer <seb.meyer at fau.de> wrote: > Thank
2020 Oct 01
3
timezone tests and R-devel
The return value of Sys.time() today with a timezone of US/Eastern is unchanged between 4.0.3-patched and devel, but on devel the following test fails all.equal(x, as.POSIXlt(x)) with x = Sys.time() This means that devel does not complete make tests (failure on tests/reg-tests-2.R) It is entirely possible that it is an error on my end, I use export TZ="US/Eastern" but I have been
2020 Oct 23
1
timezone tests and R-devel
Yes, you are absolutely right and I'm pretty sure this will be fixed in one way or another. IMO, the failing test should simply use all.equal.POSIXt's new argument check.tzone=FALSE. Two simple alternatives modifying all.equal.POSIXt behaviour: - make check.tzone=FALSE the default: this is inconsistent with other arguments of all.equal methods, always defaulting to stricter checks -
2020 Oct 23
0
timezone tests and R-devel
So let me try to raise this issue once more, and perhaps be more clear about what I think the issue is.. In my opinion there is now a bug in make check in R-development (tested today with r79361). As I see it, I specify a reasonable TZ environment variable and this leads to make check emitting an error. Best, Kasper On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 11:28 AM Kasper Daniel Hansen < kasperdanielhansen
2009 Mar 04
2
patch for axis.POSIXct (related to timezones)
I am finding that axis.POSIXct uses the local timezone for deciding where to put tic marks, even if the data being plotted are in another time zone. The solution is to use attr() to copy from the 'x' (provided as an argument) to the 'z' (used for the 'at' locations). I have pasted my proposed solution in section 1 below (as a diff). Then, in section 2, I'll put some
2017 May 04
2
complex tests failure
Thanks. I assume there is no way to control this via. environment variables or configure settings? Obviously that would be great for something like this which affects tests and seems to be a known problem for older C standard libraries. Best, Kasper On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 9:12 AM, Tomas Kalibera <tomas.kalibera at gmail.com> wrote: > > As a quick fix, you can undefine HAVE_CTANH
2017 May 05
1
complex tests failure
Thanks for the report, handled in configure in 72661 (R-devel). I'll also port to R-patched. Best Tomas On 05/04/2017 03:49 PM, Tomas Kalibera wrote: > > There is no way to control this at runtime. > We will probably have to add a configure test. > > Best, > Tomas > > On 05/04/2017 03:23 PM, Kasper Daniel Hansen wrote: >> Thanks. >> >> I assume there
2005 Feb 10
3
question about sorting POSIXt vector
Dear useRs, How come the first attempt to sort a POSIXt vector fails (Error: non-atomic type in greater), while the second succeeds? (Code inserted below.) The documentation says that POSIXt is used to allow operations such as subtraction, so I'd expect sorting to work. Is this perhaps an OS issue? (I run R 2.0.1 on Win xp.) Thank you, b. #------------code test <- c("2005-02-08
2020 Oct 30
0
bug report for make check
Dear Kasper, if you want to submit a bug via bugzilla, please first read https://www.r-project.org/bugs.html and you will learn there that there is an email address to use when asking for an account, not all R-devel mailing list readers need to read that. Moreover, I can see you already have an account in R bugzilla. Moreover, bugs can be reported also on R-devel mailing list and this has
2020 Oct 23
2
The presence/absence of `zone` in POSIXlt depending on time zone as a cause of possible inconsistences?
Dear all, I have just detected what seems a minor inconsistence with data types. If one unlists a POSIXlt time with GMT zone gets a numeric vector, since the POSIXlt list has no `zone` element, while if one unlists a POSIXlt time with a non GMT zone (also non specifying tz if the Sys.timezone is not GMT) gets a character vector due to including the `zone` element. > x <-
2020 Oct 02
0
timezone tests and R-devel
Thank you for the report. In R-devel, all.equal.POSIXt() by default reports inconsistent time zones. Previously, > x <- Sys.time() > all.equal(x, as.POSIXlt(x, tz = "EST5EDT")) would return TRUE. To ignore the time zone attributes in R-devel, the argument 'check.tzone = FALSE' needs to be used. That said, I can reproduce the 'make check' failure in R-devel on
2013 Aug 22
1
From POSIXct to numeric and back with time zone
From POSIXct to numeric and back with time zone I am running regressions on data which has time series with different time resolution. Some data has hourly resolution, while most has either daily or weekly resolution. Aggregation is used to make the hourly data daily, while liner interpolation is used to find daily data from the weekly time series. This data manipulation requires some careful
2009 Jul 08
1
R 2.9.0 plot still forcing current time zone
the help page for plot.POSIXct says "As from R 2.9.0 the date-times for a '"POSIXct"' input are interpreted in the timwzonw give by the '"tzone"' attribute it there is one, otherwise the current timezone. (Earlier vrsions always used the current timezone.)" however I am using 2.9.0 on linux and the following still happily produces an
2007 Mar 19
3
R4.1: seq.POSIXt, tz="AEST" (PR#9572)
Times from seq.POSIXt come out wrong in AEST timezone around Feb 29 every leap year before 1970 (on Windows XP). According to help(DateTimeClasses), this is handled by "our own C code". > x <- as.POSIXct("1968-02-27") # tz="AEST" > x.gmt <- as.POSIXct("1968-02-27", tz="GMT") > data.frame( GMT=seq(x.gmt, by="day",
2004 Aug 17
3
Fwd: strptime() problem?
Hi all; I've already send a similar e-mail to the list and Prof. Brian Ripley answered me but my doubts remain unresolved. Thanks for the clarification, but perhaps I wasn't clear enough in posting my questions. I've got a postgres database which I read into R. The first column is Timestamp with timezone, and my data are already in UTC format. An 'printed' extract of R
2010 Apr 16
2
format() method
Hello, I use format() function to get number of the week, like this: format(tmp,'%U') Recently, I have spotted something bizarre. For example, I have such object: (index(tmp$x.delta['2009'][1:16])) [1] "2009-01-02 CET" "2009-01-09 CET" "2009-01-16 CET" "2009-01-23 CET" [5] "2009-01-30 CET" "2009-02-06 CET"
2019 Aug 04
1
Infrequent but steady NULL-pointer caused segfault in as.POSIXlt.POSIXct (R 3.4.4)
A reply from stackoverflow suggests I might have hit this bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14023 I can confirm that this glibc bug affects my system (latest CentOS 7). However, as far as I know, R is not multithreaded in its core. Is it possible that some library triggered this? Regards, Steve Tomas Kalibera <tomas.kalibera at gmail.com> ?2019?8?2??? ??4:59??? >
2017 May 18
2
[R] R-3.4.0 fails test
This has to do with your own timezone. If I run that code on my computer, both formats are correct. If I do this after Sys.setenv(TZ = "UTC") Then: > cbind(format(dlt), format(dct)) [,1] [,2] [1,] "2016-12-06 21:45:41" "2016-12-06 20:45:41" [2,] "2016-12-06 21:45:42" "2016-12-06 20:45:42" The reason for that, is that
2009 Dec 22
1
as.Date function yields inconsistent results (PR#14166)
Full_Name: Mario Luoni Version: 2.10.0 OS: Windows XP HE SP3 Submission from: (NULL) (217.194.59.134) This piece of code: zzz1 <- as.POSIXct("1999-03-18", tz="CET") zzz2 <- as.POSIXlt("1999-03-18", tz="CET") zzz1 == zzz2 as.Date(zzz1) as.Date(zzz2) yields TRUE for "zzz1==zzz2", but the two dates returned by as.Date are different: >