Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "OpenVPN tun Interface"
2008 Jan 22
10
IPSEC VPN to VPN firewalling problem
Dear Shorewall Users :-)
I''ve been playing with shorewall for some time now - I found it really
interesting and easy tool to organise all the rules and so on (beforethat
I''ve been using simple iptables rules in shell script ;-)
Generally it''s quite easy to be used, but anyway found one problem which I
cannot handle myself - or in other words - cannot find appropriate
2005 Feb 05
13
Problem while trying to set up an ipsec vpn
Hi,
I''m asking my question here, because I could not find any answer to my
problem, but I''m affraid shorewall is not the one to blame.
First of all I''m using shorewall version 2.0.15 on two linux box.
I set up an ipsec tunnel beetween those 2 boxes to be ables to connect
2 not routable subnetworks.
Here is my network topology:
10.66.17.0/24 - 10.66.17.1 = eth0
2004 Dec 30
12
Multi-Hop VPN Issue looking for Solutions
I''ve just discovered that I do not have access to the remote gateways
for a set of IPsec tunnels to remote networks. This prevents me from
changing the routing table on those gateways.
I need "roadwarrior" systems connecting to me local network using
OpenVPN (tun) to be able to access those systems. Since the remote
gateways don''t know about 10.100.1.0/24, where my
2007 Sep 03
3
Shorewall + IPSec: help debugging why gw1<->gw2 SA works, but loc<->gw2 traffic doesn't trigger SA
Dear list,
I''m running Shorewall on a dedicated Fedora 7 box. Shorewall is working
well as an office DSL router (dynamic IP) with loc and dmz zones. I am now
trying to configure IPSec to connect a VPS, "casp", with a static IP to both
the firewall and to the loc network behind it. The host to host SA works
fine. However, pings from "loc" to "casp" can be
2005 Apr 27
5
26sec kame ipsec tunnel : packets leave unencrypted...
Hi everyone,
First of all, this is my first post in this ML, so I''m not sure that this
is the right place for my question (please don''t shoot me down ;)). For
the record, I''ve been reading and using LARTC for almost 3 years now, and
it''s a great help for anyone who wants to learn linux networking.
My problem:
I want to setup a tunnel for the following
2006 Mar 02
7
Problem with duplicate route entry
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello!
I have a problem with a duplicate route entry, when using a pre-installed route
and automatic take-over by the "heartbeat" daemon, which adds an address and
the kernel adds an route automatically.
Maybe anyone has an explanation...
> ip addr
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue
inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
2007 Dec 06
3
HTB performance improvement
HTB performance improvement
Hi all !
i''m looking at the performance of the HTB algorithm/implementation because i would like more packets/sec !!
this is the scenario of the performance test:
i''m using an embedded system with:
SPEED CPU: 399,999 MHz
RAM: 128 MByte
FLASH: 16 MByte
EEPROM: 8Kbyte
PROCESSOR MPC8272
a lan to lan 10/100 and in particular we are sending
2003 Oct 30
1
Using racoon-negotiated IPSec with ipfw and natd
[ -netters, please Cc me or security@ with replies. ]
I'm running into trouble integrating dynamic racoon-based IPSec into a network
with ipfw and natd. I need to be able to allow VPN access from any address
from authenticated clients. I've got the dynamic VPN working, with racoon
negotiating SAs and installing SPs, but the problem is that I can't tell
whether an incoming packet on
2010 May 23
4
xen4.0 debian vlan config
Hello,
can anybody help me how to configure vlans?
There are vlans:
vlan2
vlan3
vlan30
Server has one nic - eth0.
vlan2 should be dom0 eth0(peth0) for management
Each vlan3 and vlan30 should be has its own bridge.
How to make it?
Br
Peter
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
2005 Jan 01
2
htb bridge problem, please chceck my config
hello. i have following setup:
a machine (winChip 200mhz cpu, 32mb ram, linux 2.4.28) acting like a bridge
with
2 interfaces (eth0 - to our ISP, eth1 - to our network)
machine does not have any IP
there is a 802.1q vlan eth0.2
eth0.2 and eth1 are bridged in br0
i have one 4mbit link which i share with my friend, i have 3mbit and he has
1mbit
all our IP addresses are public and we have the
2003 Sep 15
1
Anyone using National ISDN (NI-1) BRI under Linux?
I have a North American BRI configured as National ISDN (NI-1) on an
SBC (Nortel?) switch. SBC calls this "FastTrak ISDN", and it's
surprisingly inexpensive -- less than two POTS lines.
I've been trying to find an inexpensive PCI interface solution to
connect this to Asterisk as voice lines. I prefer ISDN BRI over POTS
lines because of the improved signalling, fast dialing,
2007 Jul 04
8
VLAN configuration
Hi to the ML.
I''m new to VLAN configuration, and combining it to XEN is a bit difficult.
I want to use VLAN because it''s possible to "arping" from a domU to an
other, and VLAN looks like; the only solution to prevent that.
May be I''m wrong if someone got a solution, I may be interrested. I''ve
also tryed ebtables, but nothing to prevent arp
2007 Jun 21
5
GRE tunnel
I am trying to setup GRE between two CentOS 4.5 boxes. I have tried
several variations of what''s listed below, but none of them work.
box1:
modprobe ip_gre
ip link set gre0 up
ip tunnel add gretun mode gre local 66.1.1.161 remote 66.1.2.161 ttl 20 dev
eth0
ip addr add dev gretun 10.253.253.1 peer 10.253.253.2/24
ip link set dev gretun up
ip route add 10.2.0.0/16 via 10.253.253.2
box2:
2016 Jun 14
3
Upgrade to 2.2.9 breaks sasl auth
Hi
This is my 1st time here so please be gentle.
I have encountered one problem since upgrading from 2.0.19 to 2.2.9
which has me beat.
The system provides sasl auth services via inet to a postfix 2.11 system.
Since the upgrade postfix complains of no sasl methods available.
The same dovecot configuration is used on both versions.
Now I get these results looking at the inet connection
Version
2017 Jan 13
2
Firewall rules for TINC server
Hi to all.
I've setup a Tinc VPN for a bunch of nodes divided in two groups:
Group 1:
IP Range 10.100.0.2 to 10.100.127.255
Group 2:
IP Range 10.100.128.1 to 10.100.255.255
Server IP: 10.100.0.1
Every client connects only to the server.
In the server I have the following tinc.conf:
Name = server
AddressFamily = ipv4
Interface = tun0
TunnelServer = yes
Forwarding = kernel
ListenAddress =
2017 Jan 15
3
Firewall rules for TINC server
thanks, but i was able to make it work based on some suggestion on tomato
shibby forums.
Regards
Ramesh
On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Guus Sliepen <guus at tinc-vpn.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 06:53:07PM +0000, Guillermo Bisheimer wrote:
>
> > I've setup a Tinc VPN for a bunch of nodes divided in two groups:
> >
> > Group 1:
> > IP Range
2005 Feb 10
5
priorizing vlans in a bridge
Hi, this is my Linux Box
----------------------------
LAN 1 -----|--eth1 <---br1--->eth0.1 |
| \ |
| eth0--|----- 802.1q tagged 1 Mbps link
| / |
LAN 2 -----|--eth2 <---br2--->eth0.2 |
----------------------------
I have to bridge the 2 lans
2012 Jul 26
2
Error Bars ggplot2
Hello,
I'm attempting to plot error bars side by side rather than stacked on top
of each other with ggplot2. Here is the sample code I am using:
#Code
#Data
spd<-c("s","f","f","s","f","s","s","s","f","f","s","f")
r<-c(4.9,3.2,2.1,.2,3.8,6.4,7.5,1.7,3.4,4.1,2.2,5)
2014 May 30
3
Centos box and Cisco 3750 VLAN's
Hello all,
I have a CentOS box that has a NIC (eth0) on which I defined 4 VLAN's
(counting the NIC itself): eth0, eth0.1, eth0.2 and eht0.3. Initially the
Cisco switch was not partitioned into VLAN's which means that the only VLAN
running on it was the default one (VLAN 1).
I have then played with VLAN's a bit on the switch and at this point have
two: VLAN 1 (which is default and can
2008 Oct 13
6
ISDN
Hi,
I'm in the process of setting up Asterisk in a SOHO environment using ISDN for trunking. More specifically a BRI 2B+D circuit where one SPID is used for the business and the other is used for personal. The circuit already exists, but is presently being interfaced to POTS phones via a TA.
This configuration is not very common in the US, but we are fortunate that our LEC offers it price