similar to: Typos in file.path documentation.

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 6000 matches similar to: "Typos in file.path documentation."

2020 Nov 01
0
strptime() keeps emitting warnings after establishing a handler with tryCatch()
Hello, I cannot reproduce this behavior and, as documented, the posted code doesn't issue warnings due to a wrong timezone but I'm running sessionInfo() R version 4.0.3 (2020-10-10) Platform: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (64-bit) Running under: Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS Matrix products: default BLAS: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/blas/libblas.so.3.9.0 LAPACK:
2020 Oct 31
2
strptime() keeps emitting warnings after establishing a handler with tryCatch()
Dear list members, I have come about a peculiar behavior in R (4.0.2) which I would describe as a bug. On macOS, where `strptime()` raises a warning for invalid timezone identifiers, the following code will continue to raise the original warning with every subsequent call to `strptime()`: ``` # attach a handler for warnings for this call only: tryCatch(strptime('2020-10-31 18:30', format
2020 Sep 09
1
more Matrix weirdness
Am I being too optimistic in expecting this (mixing and matching matrices and Matrices) to work? If x is a matrix and m is a Matrix, replacing a commensurately sized sub-matrix of x with m throws "number of items to replace is not a multiple of replacement length" ... x <- matrix(0,nrow=3,ncol=10, dimnames=list(letters[1:3],LETTERS[1:10])) rr <-
2020 Sep 23
0
[R] jitter-bug? problematic behaviour of the jitter function
Hello, R 4.0.2 on Ubuntu 20.04, sessionInfo at end. This came up in r-help, I'm answering to the OP and also posting to r-devel since I believe it is more appropriate there. I can confirm this. The original instructions are the first and the last, but even with smaller numbers the error shows up. set.seed(2020) jitter(c(1,2,10^4)) # desired behaviour #[1] 1.058761 1.957690
2020 Sep 23
3
jitter-bug? problematic behaviour of the jitter function
Dear all, i have noticed some strange behaviour in the ?jitter? function in R. On the help page for jitter it is stated that "The result, say r, is r <- x + runif(n, -a, a) where n <- length(x) and a is the amount argument (if specified).? and "If amount is NULL (default), we set a <- factor * d/5 where d is the smallest difference between adjacent unique (apart from fuzz) x
2020 Sep 23
3
jitter-bug? problematic behaviour of the jitter function
Dear all, i have noticed some strange behaviour in the ?jitter? function in R. On the help page for jitter it is stated that "The result, say r, is r <- x + runif(n, -a, a) where n <- length(x) and a is the amount argument (if specified).? and "If amount is NULL (default), we set a <- factor * d/5 where d is the smallest difference between adjacent unique (apart from fuzz) x
2019 Jun 21
4
Calculation of e^{z^2/2} for a normal deviate z
Hello, Well, try it: p <- .Machine$double.eps^seq(0.5, 1, by = 0.05) z <- qnorm(p/2) pnorm(z) # [1] 7.450581e-09 1.228888e-09 2.026908e-10 3.343152e-11 5.514145e-12 # [6] 9.094947e-13 1.500107e-13 2.474254e-14 4.080996e-15 6.731134e-16 #[11] 1.110223e-16 p/2 # [1] 7.450581e-09 1.228888e-09 2.026908e-10 3.343152e-11 5.514145e-12 # [6] 9.094947e-13 1.500107e-13 2.474254e-14 4.080996e-15
2018 Jun 22
1
Bug in as.Date or strptime?
Hello, This just came up in SO, sessionInfo() at the end. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/50988018/seeking-explanation-for-as-date-function-in-r?noredirect=1#comment88971055_50988018 # example 1 # not even the month is right as.Date(x = 1, format = '%j', origin= '2015-01-01') #[1] "2018-07-21" # example 2a # nonsense output as.Date(x = 1, origin=
2020 Sep 09
3
more Matrix weirdness
I think that this is because `[<-` dispatches on S4 methods only if the first argument is S4. ?"[<-" says: "These operators are also implicit S4 generics, but as primitives, S4 methods will be dispatched only on S4 objects ?x?." Georgi Boshnakov -----Original Message----- Message: 19 Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 22:04:44 -0400 From: Ben Bolker <bbolker at
2019 Jun 21
4
Calculation of e^{z^2/2} for a normal deviate z
You may want to look into using the log option to qnorm e.g., in round figures: > log(1e-300) [1] -690.7755 > qnorm(-691, log=TRUE) [1] -37.05315 > exp(37^2/2) [1] 1.881797e+297 > exp(-37^2/2) [1] 5.314068e-298 Notice that floating point representation cuts out at 1e+/-308 or so. If you want to go outside that range, you may need explicit manipulation of the log values. qnorm()
2019 Feb 01
3
nlminb with constraints failing on some platforms
Hello, R 3.5.2 on ubuntu 18.04. sessionInfo() at the end. Works with me, same results, cannot reproduce the error. f <- function(x) sum( log(diff(x)^2+.01) + (x[1]-1)^2 ) opt <- nlminb(rep(0, 10), f, lower=-1, upper=3) str(opt) xhat <- rep(1, 10) all.equal(opt$par, xhat, tol=0) # good: 5.53 e-7 #[1] "Mean relative difference: 5.534757e-07" all.equal(opt$objective,
2019 Jun 23
2
Calculation of e^{z^2/2} for a normal deviate z
I agree with many the sentiments about the wisdom of computing very small p-values (although the example below may win some kind of a prize: I've seen people talking about p-values of the order of 10^(-2000), but never 10^(-(10^8)) !). That said, there are a several tricks for getting more reasonable sums of very small probabilities. The first is to scale the p-values by dividing the
2019 Jul 15
4
Possible bug in `class<-` when a class-specific '[[.' method is defined
Hello, Clean R 3.6.1 session on Ubuntu 19.04, RStudio 1.1.453. sessionInfo() at the end. I can reproduce this. counttt <- 0 `[[.MYCLASS` = function(x, ...) { counttt <<- counttt + 1 # browser() x = NextMethod() return(x) } df <- as.data.frame(matrix(1:20, nrow=5)) class(df) <- c("MYCLASS","data.frame") counttt #[1] 9 But there's more. I
2019 Jun 24
2
Calculation of e^{z^2/2} for a normal deviate z
>>>>> William Dunlap via R-devel >>>>> on Sun, 23 Jun 2019 10:34:47 -0700 writes: >>>>> William Dunlap via R-devel >>>>> on Sun, 23 Jun 2019 10:34:47 -0700 writes: > include/Rmath.h declares a set of 'logspace' functions for use at the C > level. I don't think there are core R functions that call
2005 Oct 31
2
Sweave (R?) font encoding problems
Dear R list, I'm having some problems with font encodings when using R+Sweave+Latex in my native language: Portuguese. My environment: Kubuntu 5.10 Linux $> uname -a Linux nassa 2.6.12-9-686 #1 Mon Oct 10 13:25:32 BST 2005 i686 GNU/Linux R> R.version _ platform i486-pc-linux-gnu arch i486 os linux-gnu system i486, linux-gnu
2020 Sep 10
0
more Matrix weirdness
>>>>> Georgi Boshnakov >>>>> on Wed, 9 Sep 2020 10:48:56 +0000 writes: > I think that this is because `[<-` dispatches on S4 > methods only if the first argument is S4. ?"[<-" says: > "These operators are also implicit S4 generics, but as > primitives, S4 methods will be dispatched only on S4 > objects
2012 Feb 28
3
workflow using git for translations
I did a first set of minor translations to become familiar with the process. These changes have been committed in "main" wine git (how do you call it?). In the meanwhile, I did a bunch of changes. Now I want to create a patch for these changes. I did a > git stash save (and I had a copy of the file somewhere else) and then a > git pull Auto-merging po/pt_PT.po CONFLICT
2019 Feb 28
2
Exit status of Rscript
Current R release (3.5.2) and devel return a 0 exit status on error, while prior versions returned a non-zero exit status. On Linux and MacOs, the following line returns TRUE for R-3.5.2 and R-devel, and FALSE for R-3.5.1 and R-3.5.0: system2("Rscript", c("-e", shQuote("stop('foo')"))) == 0 I didn't find this in the NEWS, so I believe this is a bug.
2019 May 30
2
use of buffers in sprintf and snprintf
Hi again, I realised it is useful to replicate the warnings locally without relying on CRAN automatic check; instead of R(-devel) CMD check --as-cran package_version.tar.gz one can use R CMD check --configure-args="" and in my case the WARNINGS were initially given with https://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/bdr/gcc9/README.txt and those specification might as well used in --configure-args
2019 Jun 21
0
Calculation of e^{z^2/2} for a normal deviate z
Dear Rui, Thanks for your quick reply -- this allows me to see the bottom of this. I was hoping we could have a handle of those p in genmoics such as 1e-300 or smaller. Best wishes, Jing Hua ________________________________ From: Rui Barradas <ruipbarradas at sapo.pt> Sent: 21 June 2019 15:03 To: jing hua zhao; r-devel at r-project.org Subject: Re: [Rd] Calculation of e^{z^2/2} for a