similar to: object.size vs lobstr::obj_size

On 2/19/20 3:55 AM, Stefan Schreiber wrote: > I have posted this question on R-help where it was suggested to me > that I might get a better response on R-devel. So far I have gotten no > response. The post I am talking about is here: > https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2020-February/465700.html > > My apologies for cross-posting, which I am aware is impolite and I >

On 3/27/20 12:00, Hadley Wickham wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 10:39 AM Herv? Pag?s <hpages at fredhutch.org > <mailto:hpages at fredhutch.org>> wrote: > > Hi Tomas, > > On 3/27/20 07:01, Tomas Kalibera wrote: > > they provide an over-approximation > > They can also provide an "under-approximation" (to say the

On 3/27/20 15:19, Hadley Wickham wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 4:01 PM Herv? Pag?s <hpages at fredhutch.org > <mailto:hpages at fredhutch.org>> wrote: > > > > On 3/27/20 12:00, Hadley Wickham wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 10:39 AM Herv? Pag?s > <hpages at fredhutch.org <mailto:hpages at

On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 4:01 PM Herv? Pag?s <hpages at fredhutch.org> wrote: > > > On 3/27/20 12:00, Hadley Wickham wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 10:39 AM Herv? Pag?s <hpages at fredhutch.org > > <mailto:hpages at fredhutch.org>> wrote: > > > > Hi Tomas, > > > > On 3/27/20 07:01, Tomas Kalibera wrote:

On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 10:39 AM Herv? Pag?s <hpages at fredhutch.org> wrote: > Hi Tomas, > > On 3/27/20 07:01, Tomas Kalibera wrote: > > they provide an over-approximation > > They can also provide an "under-approximation" (to say the least) e.g. > on reference objects where the entire substance of the object is ignored > which makes object.size()

Hi Tomas, On 3/27/20 07:01, Tomas Kalibera wrote: > they provide an over-approximation They can also provide an "under-approximation" (to say the least) e.g. on reference objects where the entire substance of the object is ignored which makes object.size() completely meaningless in that case: setRefClass("A", fields=c(stuff="ANY"))

On 3/27/20 4:39 PM, Herv? Pag?s wrote: > Hi Tomas, > > On 3/27/20 07:01, Tomas Kalibera wrote: >> they provide an over-approximation > > They can also provide an "under-approximation" (to say the least) e.g. > on reference objects where the entire substance of the object is > ignored which makes object.size() completely meaningless in that case: > > ?

It seems like you want to use -> and <- as arrows with different meanings to "A gets the value of B" in your package, as a means of writing expressions in your package language. Another possibility would be to use different symbols instead of the problematic -> and <-, for example you could use <.~ and ~.> which are not at all flipped or changed before you get a chance

This patch enlarges the PCI GART aperture to 512 MB. The current 64MB aperture is too small and should be enlarged. The optimal amound may be card/system-dependent, so a more sophisticated approach may be preferable. In particular, if RAMIN is less than 1MB, a 512MB aperture won't fit. Signed-off-by: Luca Barbieri <luca at luca-barbieri.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_sgdma.c

Dear Barry, In general, I believe users are already accustomed with the classical arrows "->" and "<-" which are used as such in quoted expressions. But I agree that "-.>" is a very neat trick, thanks a lot. A small dot, what a difference. All the best, Dmitri On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 11:40?AM Barry Rowlingson < b.rowlingson at lancaster.ac.uk> wrote:

Maybe someone has already suggested this, but if your functions accepted strings you could use sub or gsub to replace the -> with a symbol that parsed at the same precedence as <-, say <<-. Then parse it and deal with it. When it is time to display the parsed and perhaps manipulated formulae to the user, deparse it and do the reverse replacement. > encode <-

Dear R Developers, After having fully read "Advanced R First Edition" , and having just bought my physical copy of "Advanced R Second Edition", I recommend that: Any community member interested in the development of R reads "Advanced R Second Edition", which explains R Language Core concepts cristal clear, and shows the motivation behind libraries such as

Hi Thomas. On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 10:36:44AM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > Several GEM and PRIME callbacks have been deprecated in favor of > per-instance GEM object functions. Remove the callbacks as they are > now unused. The only exception is .gem_prime_mmap, which is still > in use by several drivers. > > What is also gone is gem_vm_ops in struct drm_driver. All

Dear all, `?Syntax` documents that `?` has the lowest precedence, right under `=`. Indeed it reads: *The following unary and binary operators are defined. They are listed in precedence groups, from highest to lowest. * and ends the list with *<- <<-* *assignment (right to left)* *=* *assignment (right to left)* *?* *help (unary and binary)* I believe it to be wrong, `=` has lower

Changes in v2: - Compute size based on ramin_rsvd_size This patch enlarges the PCI GART aperture to 512 MB, or the space covered by a DMA object filling half RAMIN. The current 64MB aperture is too small and should be enlarged. The optimal amound may be card/system-dependent, so a more sophisticated approach may be preferable. Could anyone with an nv04 test whether this doesn't break there?

Dear R-users, This should be simple but still eludes me: Given the following tmp<-as.data.frame(matrix(c(44, 10, "abc", 1, 44, 10, "def", 1, 44, 12, "abc", 2), 3, 4, byrow=T)) I want to expand the data to the following form: V1 V2 V3 V4 1 44 10 abc 1 2 44 10 def 1 3 44 12 abc 1 4 44 12 abc 1 The last row of the original df was duplicated the row by the

Several GEM and PRIME callbacks have been deprecated in favor of per-instance GEM object functions. Remove the callbacks as they are now unused. The only exception is .gem_prime_mmap, which is still in use by several drivers. What is also gone is gem_vm_ops in struct drm_driver. All drivers now use struct drm_gem_object_funcs.vm_ops instead. While at it, the patch also improves error handling

Several GEM and PRIME callbacks have been deprecated in favor of per-instance GEM object functions. Remove the callbacks as they are now unused. The only exception is .gem_prime_mmap, which is still in use by several drivers. What is also gone is gem_vm_ops in struct drm_driver. All drivers now use struct drm_gem_object_funcs.vm_ops instead. While at it, the patch also improves error handling

Hello, I am trying to obtain the partial r-square values (r^2 or R2) for individual predictors of an outcome variable in multiple linear regression. I am using the 'lm' function to calculate the beta coefficients, however, I would like to know the individual % contributions of several indepenent variables. I tried searching for this function in many R packages, but it has proven elusive

Can anyone recommend a good cordless user-configurable SIP hardphone that is readily available in the states and doesn't cost $300? There seem to be a plethora of decent and affordable corded phones (like from Grandstream) but the search for a cordless unit seems elusive. I purchased a vtech 8100 online only to discover after receiving it that it is locked to vonage service. Thank you.