similar to: unstable corner of parameter space for qbeta?

Given that a number of us are housebound, it might be a good time to try to improve the approximation. It's not an area where I have much expertise, but in looking at the qbeta.c code I see a lot of root-finding, where I do have some background. However, I'm very reluctant to work alone on this, and will ask interested others to email off-list. If there are others, I'll report back.

>>>>> Ben Bolker >>>>> on Wed, 25 Mar 2020 21:09:16 -0400 writes: > I've discovered an infelicity (I guess) in qbeta(): it's not a bug, > since there's a clear warning about lack of convergence of the numerical > algorithm ("full precision may not have been achieved"). I can work > around this, but I'm

Despite the need to focus on pbeta, I'm still willing to put in some effort. But I find it really helps to have 2-3 others involved, since the questions back and forth keep matters moving forward. Volunteers? Thanks to Martin for detailed comments. JN On 2020-03-26 10:34 a.m., Martin Maechler wrote: >>>>>> J C Nash >>>>>> on Thu, 26 Mar 2020

hi, i'm new to R and i'm trying to port a quattro pro spreadsheet into R. spreadsheets have optional lower and upper limit parameters on the beta distribution function. i would like to know how to incorporate this with R's pbeta function. thanks in advance, mara. ____________________________________________________________________________________ Park yourself in front of a

HI All: Does anyone know the code behind the qbeta function in R? I am using it to calculate exact confidence intervals and I am getting 'NaN' at places I shouldnt be. Heres the simple code I am using: k<-3 > x<-NULL > p<-rbeta(k,3,3)# so that the mean nausea rate is alpha/(alpha+beta) > min<-10 > max<-60 > n<-as.integer(runif(3,min,max)) > for(i in

make check of R-alpha_2006-04-08_r37675 fails on Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 running on an Intel P4 computer. > version _ platform i686-pc-linux-gnu arch i686 os linux-gnu system i686, linux-gnu status

Dear R-Developers, I just started learning how to use Rcpp. Earlier while using it, I encountered an error as shown below: file74d8254b96d4.cpp: In function ‘Rcpp::NumericVector foo(Rcpp::NumericVector, Rcpp::NumericVector, Rcpp::NumericVector, Rcpp::Function, Rcpp::Function)’: file74d8254b96d4.cpp:10: error: invalid operands of types ‘SEXPREC*’ and ‘R_len_t’ to binary ‘operator/’ make: ***

Dear R gurus, I have a function "goftests" that receives the following arguments: * a vector "x" of data values; * a distribution name "dist"; * the dots list ("...") containing a list a parameters to pass to CDF function; and calls several goodness-of-fit tests on the given data values against the given distribution. That is: ##### BEGIN CODE SNIP #####

Buenos dias! Os escribo para ver si me podeis ayudar con un asunto en el que me he quedado un poco encallado. Lo que tengo que hacer es sacar los percentiles (0.001, 0.005, 0.95 y 0.999) de varias distribuciones beta, concretamente 418. Cada distribucion esta definida por los parametros "shape1" y "shape2". Por lo tanto tengo una base de datos de 418 filas y en cada una de

Hallo, I need your help. I fitted my distribution of data with beta-prime, I need now to plot the Cumulative distribution. For other distribution like Gamma is easy: x <- seq (0, 100, 0.5) plot(x,pgamma(x, shape, scale), type= "l", col="red") but what about beta-prime? In R it exists only pbeta which is intended only for the beta distribution (not beta-prime) This is

This is also strange: qbeta <- function (p, shape1, shape2, ncp = 0, lower.tail = TRUE, log.p = FALSE) { if (missing(ncp)) .Call(C_qbeta, p, shape1, shape2, lower.tail, log.p) else .Call(C_qnbeta, p, shape1, shape2, ncp, lower.tail, log.p) } Since the default value is 0 for non-centrality, it seems like the logic above is wrong. When ncp=0, C_qnbeta would be called

Full_Name: Morten Welinder Version: 1.6.1 OS: Solaris/sparc Submission from: (NULL) (65.213.85.144) qbeta(0.1, 1e-8, 0.5, TRUE, FALSE) seems to hang for me.

>Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 10:03:23 -0400 (EDT) From: Morten Welinder <welinder@rentec.com> >To: p.dalgaard@biostat.ku.dk >CC: r-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch, R-bugs@biostat.ku.dk >Subject: Re: [Rd] qbeta hang (PR#2894) > >Ok, I can confirm that it does not, in fact, loop forever. Just a close >approximation. ... >There are lots of other places that worry me with respect to

Dear R users, first I take this opportunity to greet all the R community for your continuous efforts. I wrote a function to calculate the pdf and cdf of a custom distribution (mixed gamma model). The function is the following: pmixedgamma3 <- function(y, shape1, rate1, shape2, rate2, prev) { density.function<-function(x) { shape1=shape1 rate1=rate1 shape2=shape2

Hi, sorry for repeating the question but this is kind of important to me and i don't know whom should i ask. So as noted before when I do a parameter fit to the beta distr i get: fitdist(vectNorm,"beta"); Fitting of the distribution ' beta ' by maximum likelihood Parameters: estimate Std. Error shape1 2.148779 0.1458042 shape2 810.067515 61.8608126 Warning

Hi folks, I have a question about how to efficiently produce random numbers from Beta and Binomial distributions. For Beta distribution, suppose we have two shape vectors shape1 and shape2. I hope to generate a 10000 x 2 matrix X whose i th rwo is a sample from reta(2,shape1[i]mshape2[i]). Of course this can be done via loops: for(i in 1:10000) { X[i,]=rbeta(2,shape1[i],shape2[i]) } However,

Dear friends. Is this as expected ? Is alpha and beta too large simply ? > dbeta(.1,534,646) [1] NaN Warning message: NaNs produced in: dbeta(x, shape1, shape2, log) Best wishes Troels -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or

Hi, I sometimes play around with extreme parameters for distributions and found that qbeta is not always monotone as the following example shows. I don't know whether this is serious enough to submit a bug report (as this example is near to the limitations of floating point arithmetic). Josef > x <- qbeta((0:100)/100,0.01,5) > x [1] 0.000000e+00 1.253990e-201 1.589622e-171

Hi , I am new to R. I am trying to run a simple R script as shown below: aov.R ------ data1<-c(49,47,46,47,48,47,41,46,43,47,46,45,48,46,47,45,49,44,44,45,42,45,45,40 ,49,46,47,45,49,45,41,43,44,46,45,40,45,43,44,45,48,46,40,45,40,45,47,40) matrix(data1, ncol= 4, dimnames = list(paste("subj", 1:12), c("Shape1.Color1", "Shape2.Color1", "Shape1.Color2",

Hi, Interpretation problem ! so what i did is by using the: >fit1 <- fitdist(vectNorm,"beta") Warning messages: 1: In dbeta(x, shape1, shape2, log) : NaNs produced 2: In dbeta(x, shape1, shape2, log) : NaNs produced 3: In dbeta(x, shape1, shape2, log) : NaNs produced 4: In dbeta(x, shape1, shape2, log) : NaNs produced 5: In dbeta(x, shape1, shape2, log) : NaNs produced 6: In