similar to: capabilities(), was [R-pkg-devel] ... No protocol specified (OS X only)

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "capabilities(), was [R-pkg-devel] ... No protocol specified (OS X only)"

2015 May 06
0
capabilities("X11"): Force refresh from within R? (... and minor documentation issue)
Is there a way to refresh capabilities("X11") without restarting R such that it reflects the enabling/disabling of X11? BACKGROUND: If I launch R with X11 server disabled (e.g. ssh -X / ssh -Y to remote Linux but forgot to enable Xming on local Windows), then I get: > capabilities("X11") X11 FALSE > x11() Error in .External2(C_X11, d$display, d$width, d$height,
2016 Nov 17
0
ACPI ERROR
Hi list, I've installed C7 1511 (kernel 3.10.x) on a skylake mother board with i3-6100. I know about skylake problems. For the iGPU I've used i915.preliminary_support and ok. Some days ago, I get different strange error on this machine. When screensaver starts or when monitor will be in energy saving, if I try to get access to the system I get different strange behaviour and can't
2014 May 16
2
Inconsistency in vector printing depending on length
Consider the following: > 20:28[1] 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28> 20:29 [1] 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 It seems that when a vector has 10 elements, it prints out differently than one with 9 (extra space before the opening bracket). I can't see why this is happening. I am writing a manual containing many examples and the misalignment of the [1]'s is visually problematic. For
2017 Dec 05
2
command line arguments are parsed differently on windows, from 3.4.3
One comment: For your R devel example you didn't use spaces in the expression, i.e. maybe that's broken too with spaces? Three questions: Does it work if you avoid spaces? Does it work if you use single quotes? Does this also occur for Rscript? Thxs Henrik On Dec 5, 2017 03:44, "G?bor Cs?rdi" <csardi.gabor at gmail.com> wrote: I wonder if this is intended. Thanks,
2001 Mar 08
1
Start smbd and nmbd daemons on other HP Unix (version 10.20) serv er
Hi everyone, I would like to know if it's possible to start the smbd/nmbd daemons from an other HP Unix server. The installation of Samba has been made on a RAID mounted on an other Unix server (the main one). We want to do that because whe need to reduce the working flow in the main server. Thanks Daniel Comtois, Unix Tech. daniel.comtois@viasystems.com -------------- next part
2017 Dec 05
0
command line arguments are parsed differently on windows, from 3.4.3
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Henrik Bengtsson <henrik.bengtsson at gmail.com> wrote: > One comment: > For your R devel example you didn't use spaces in the expression, i.e. maybe > that's broken too with spaces? I did. There are two R-devel examples, one with spaces (buggy) and one without spaces (works). To show that spaces are the problem. > Three questions: >
2017 Dec 05
0
command line arguments are parsed differently on windows, from 3.4.3
A quick workaround if you needed to execute R expressions in Windows is calling RTerm directly. But a fix should be available soon. Tomas On 12/05/2017 05:51 PM, Henrik Bengtsson wrote: > Sorry for not reading carefully and thanks for confirming problem with > Rscript too. > > On Dec 5, 2017 08:47, "G?bor Cs?rdi" <csardi.gabor at gmail.com> wrote: > >> On
2017 Dec 05
2
command line arguments are parsed differently on windows, from 3.4.3
Sorry for not reading carefully and thanks for confirming problem with Rscript too. On Dec 5, 2017 08:47, "G?bor Cs?rdi" <csardi.gabor at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Henrik Bengtsson > <henrik.bengtsson at gmail.com> wrote: > > One comment: > > For your R devel example you didn't use spaces in the expression, i.e. > maybe
2001 Mar 08
1
Start smbd and nmbd daemons on other HP Unix (version 10.20) Server
Hi everyone, I would like to know if it's possible to start the smbd/nmbd daemons from an other HP Unix server. The installation of Samba has been made on a RAID mounted on an other Unix server (the main one). We want to do that because whe need to reduce the work of the main server. Thanks Daniel Comtois, Unix Tech. daniel.comtois@viasystems.com -------------- next part --------------
2023 Jan 10
2
rhub vs. CRAN fedora-*-devel, using armadillo & slapack
Thank you for your answer. In facts, 10 threads are asked by armadillo for some LinAlg, which backs to two threads as warned. But I cannot imagine this costs so much time just for that... A deeper analysis of time spent seems to point that a large time was mainly spent on testthat and Rcpp dependencies compilation... But other recent packages depending on these also are not spending so much time.
2023 Jan 10
1
rhub vs. CRAN fedora-*-devel, using armadillo & slapack
Dear R-devel people, We are working to submit a package which is mainly a binding over a C++ lib (https://github.com/libKriging) using armadillo. It is _not_ a standard RcppArmadillo package, because we also had to provide a python binding... so there is a huge layer of cmake & scripting to make it work with a standard armadillo (but using same version that RcppArmadillo). It seems now
2023 Jan 10
1
rhub vs. CRAN fedora-*-devel, using armadillo & slapack
Le 10/01/2023 ? 10:44, RICHET Yann a ?crit?: > Dear R-devel people, > > We are working to submit a package which is mainly a binding over a C++ lib (https://github.com/libKriging) using armadillo. > It is _not_ a standard RcppArmadillo package, because we also had to provide a python binding... so there is a huge layer of cmake & scripting to make it work with a standard armadillo
2023 Jan 10
1
rhub vs. CRAN fedora-*-devel, using armadillo & slapack
Le 10/01/2023 ? 11:37, Serguei Sokol a ?crit?: > Le 10/01/2023 ? 10:44, RICHET Yann a ?crit?: >> Dear R-devel people, >> >> We are working to submit a package which is mainly a binding over a >> C++ lib (https://github.com/libKriging) using armadillo. >> It is _not_ a standard RcppArmadillo package, because we also had to >> provide a python binding... so
2007 Jul 13
1
[LLVMdev] NO-OP
> Why do you want to do this? Empty MBBs are valid, and it's probably > better to have your code handle them. Currently, that is the solution. I have a special treatment for empty basic blocks. I think the code would be more homogeneous if there were no empty basic blocks. > > There is a NOP "instruction" on x86, equivalent to XCHG EAX, EAX. The problem with xchk
2020 Mar 03
0
survival bug?
Hi Terry, http://win-builder.r-project.org/ and the rhub build service (which can be invoked by the rhub package) allow on demand checks in windows environments, though for active debugging the iteration time can be quite painful. If you have access, e.g., through your employer, to a windows license you should also be able to do use VMWare or VirtualBox (I can never remember which one I like
2023 Jan 11
2
rhub vs. CRAN fedora-*-devel, using armadillo & slapack
On 11/01/2023 12:35 p.m., RICHET Yann wrote: > Thank you all, for these advices. > > So I try to fix OMP_THREADS, cleanup tests, and display explicitly what test is running by moving in tests/ instead of tests/testthat/... > Next step should be to investigate blocking test using a reporter (maybe "list"). > For now, waiting for CRAN results... I think Sebastian or my
2016 Nov 07
1
R CMD check --as-cran: sslv3 alert handshake failure
On R 3.2.5, 3.3.2 and devel for Windows, R CMD check --as-cran gives me: Found the following (possibly) invalid URLs: URL: https://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~paul/Reports/DisplayList/dl-record.html From: man/capturePlot.Rd Status: Error Message: libcurl error code 35 error:14077410:SSL routines:SSL23_GET_SERVER_HELLO:sslv3 alert handshake failure This is reported both by the
2007 Jul 14
0
[LLVMdev] NO-OP
Hello, Fernando. > The problem with xchk EAX, EAX is that is uses registers, and it would > add a small burden on the register allocator. There is "just" NOP instruction on x86. Its opcode is 0x90. -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov. Faculty of Mathematics & Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University.
2023 Apr 06
1
"prob" package alternative
>>>>> peter murage >>>>> on Tue, 4 Apr 2023 06:24:56 +0000 writes: > Which package in R replaced package prob? Well, if you google that you should quickly be lead to (something I even think makes sense to memorize as "rule" package=<pkg> ) : https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=prob which now says that the package was archived as it
2023 Jan 11
2
rhub vs. CRAN fedora-*-devel, using armadillo & slapack
Thank you all, for these advices. So I try to fix OMP_THREADS, cleanup tests, and display explicitly what test is running by moving in tests/ instead of tests/testthat/... Next step should be to investigate blocking test using a reporter (maybe "list"). For now, waiting for CRAN results... Yann -----Message d'origine----- De?: Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com>