similar to: BUG?: A copy of base::`+` (primitive) is not a clone but a "pointer"

On 11/18/19 9:18 AM, Martin Maechler wrote: >>>>>> Henrik Bengtsson >>>>>> on Sun, 17 Nov 2019 14:31:07 -0800 writes: > > $ R --vanilla R version 3.6.1 (2019-07-05) -- "Action of > > the Toes" Copyright (C) 2019 The R Foundation for > > Statistical Computing Platform: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu > > (64-bit) ...

On 11/18/19 10:45 AM, Martin Maechler wrote: >>>>>> Tomas Kalibera >>>>>> on Mon, 18 Nov 2019 09:36:14 +0100 writes: > > On 11/18/19 9:18 AM, Martin Maechler wrote: > >>>>>>> Henrik Bengtsson > >>>>>>> on Sun, 17 Nov 2019 14:31:07 -0800 writes: > >> > $ R --vanilla R

For what it's worth, the current behavior seems to have begun starting with version 3.6.0. If I run in version 3.5.3: > p1 <- .Primitive('+') ; p2 <- p1 ; attr(p1, "myattr") <- 1 ; p2 function (e1, e2)? .Primitive("+") > On 11/18/19 10:45 AM, Martin Maechler wrote: > >>>>>>/Tomas Kalibera />>>>>>/on Mon, 18

>>>>> Tomas Kalibera >>>>> on Mon, 18 Nov 2019 09:36:14 +0100 writes: > On 11/18/19 9:18 AM, Martin Maechler wrote: >>>>>>> Henrik Bengtsson >>>>>>> on Sun, 17 Nov 2019 14:31:07 -0800 writes: >> > $ R --vanilla R version 3.6.1 (2019-07-05) -- "Action of >> > the Toes"

Hello, I don't see why you say that the documentation seems to be wrong: class(args(`+`)) #[1] "function" args() on a primitive does return a closure. At least in this case it does. Rui Barradas ?s 14:05 de 07/10/2018, Peter Dalgaard escreveu: > There is more "fun" afoot here, but I don't recall what the point may be: > >> args(get("+"))

Hi all, I don't understand why this does not what I expect : ## code start here ############## setClass("num",representation(x="numeric")) num<-function(x) new("num",x=x) add<-function(e1,e2) { cat("Computing ",deparse(substitute(e1)),"+",deparse(substitute(e2)),"\n") e1@x+e2@x }

Hello, Is there a way to define a custom unary operator in R (other than making a class and 'overloading' the normal unary operators in R)? The documentation seems to suggest that only custom binary operators are possible with the ``%abc%``construct but I was wondering whether any one has done so. None of the RSiteSearch or RSeek queries I posed suggested that this question had

Dear R Gurus: How do I find the functions which are primitives, please? Thanks, Edna Bell

Ein eingebundener Text mit undefiniertem Zeichensatz wurde abgetrennt. Name: nicht verf?gbar URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20101028/d7e0cc89/attachment.pl>

Hello,   I would like to overload the "+" operator so that it can be used to concatenate two strings, e.g "John" + "Doe" = "JohnDoe". How can I 'unseal' the "+" method? > setMethod("+", signature(e1="character", e2="character"), function(e1, e2) paste(e1, e2, sep="") ) Error in

Hi, I'm trying to read a .mat file into R (2.11.1) with medium success so far. The file I have is a MATLAB 5.0 MAT-file exported from RiverSurveyor LIVE software (http://www.sontek.com/software.php). I have R.matlab and Rcompression installed and readMat() starts reading the file, as can be seen in verbose mode (hence medium success), but then gives the following error: Error in dim(matrix)

Dear Hilmar Perhaps this gives an indication of why the infinite recursion happens: ## after calling `*` on ma and a matrix: > showMethods(classes=class(ma), includeDefs=TRUE, inherited = TRUE) Function: * (package base) e1="FOOCLASS", e2="matrix" (inherited from: e1="vector", e2="structure") (definition from function "Ops")

Hello, This is because args(`[`) returns NULL and class(NULL) is NULL. So the question would be why is the return value of args(`[`) NULL? Rui Barradas ?s 15:14 de 07/10/2018, Peter Dalgaard escreveu: > > >> On 7 Oct 2018, at 16:04 , Rui Barradas <ruipbarradas at sapo.pt> wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> I don't see why you say that the documentation

Hi, we have some questions concerning the definition of new arithmetic methods. In our package "distr" (on CRAN) we define some new arithmetic methods for "+", "-", "*", "/". After loading "distr" the corresponding arithmetic methods work. Now, if we define a new class and also a new method for one of the arithmetic methods

I downloaded R v2.1.1 earlier this morning to compile under Fedora Core 4. It compiled without incident, but 'make check' failed. Below is the relevant part of its report. Is this a known problem? I used a locally compiled version of GCC v4.0.0 that reports [kent at d89h102 R-2.1.1]$ gcc -v Using built-in specs. Target: i686-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: ../gcc-4.0.0/configure

Dear all, I am trying to define "+" method for my newly defined s4 class which is as follows: setClass("Me", sealed=F,representation(x1 = "numeric", x2 = "character")) new1 <- new("Me", x1=2, x2="comment1") new2 <- new("Me", x1=3, x2="comment1") setMethod("+", "Me",

Hi, What's wrong here?: > v=c(`-`,`+`,1,`^`,`^`,NA,NA,"X",9,"X",2) > i2=16 > v[i2] [[1]] NULL > is.null(v[i2]) [1] FALSE Is it a bug or have I misunderstood something? Atte Tenkanen University of Turku, Finland

Hi, A short code example showing the warning might the only thing needed here: ``` > formals(args(`[`)) NULL *Warning message:In formals(fun) : argument is not a function* > is.function(`[`) [1] TRUE > is.primitive(`[`) [1] TRUE ``` Now with an other primitive: ``` > formals(args(`sum`)) $... $na.rm [1] FALSE > is.function(`sum`) [1] TRUE > is.primitive(`sum`) [1] TRUE

many languages have shorthands for that operation like: variable += 1 or ++variable is there something like that in R ? -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/increase-or-decrease-variable-by-1-tp3076390p3076390.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Dear all, on my Windows XP R 2.4.0 version with Package its version 1.1.4 I have a problem with str() applied on an its-object after a simple matrix manipulation on the its object (see below). I am not sure, whether this a problem with my application, its or str(). Of course, one can make > str(core(its(mat)) / 1) num [1:2, 1:3] 1 2 3 4 5 6 - attr(*, "dimnames")=List of 2 ..$