similar to: Check length of logical vector also for operands of || and &&?

I have access to a cluster on which I have been supplied with R 3.1.0 which appears to have been built using the intel compiler tools. The following minimal Fortran file: subroutine truth(lind) logical lind lind = .TRUE. end Compiles thusly: arcadia> R CMD SHLIB truth.f ifort -fpic -O3 -xHOST -axCORE-AVX-I -fp-model precise -c truth.f -o truth.o ifort: command

Hi all, anyone has an idea how I could fix this? \donttest{ ## Set colors from colorspace package with a fallback col <- try(colorspace::rainbow_hcl(5), silent = TRUE) %||% rainbow(5) } The problem is that this makes R CMD check freak out (http://www.r-project.org/nosvn/R.check/r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang/falsy-00check.html) if the colorspace package is not declared as a dependency.

Is the following a strange behavior for `mean` vs. `sd` ? ``` $ R --vanilla. ## 4.4.2 > x=c(NA,1,2,3) > c( mean(x,na.rm=T), sd(x,na.rm=T) ) [1] 2 1 > T=20 ## bad idea for a parameter. T is also used for TRUE > c( mean(x,na.rm=T), sd(x,na.rm=T) ) [1] NA 1 > ``` This one was a baffler for me to track down for a few hours...

On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 9:59 AM Chris Tetreault via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > David, > > > > In my opinion, NDEBUG is one of those gross old C things that everybody > complains about. It’s called “Not Debug”, but really it means “Assert > Disabled”. I think one could be forgiven for actually using it as a > heuristic of whether or not a build

Hi all, During discussions about assertions in the Flang project, we noticed that there are a lot of cases in LLVM that #ifndef NDEBUG is used as a guard for non-assert code that we want enabled in debug builds. This works fine on its own, however it affects the behaviour of LLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS; since NDEBUG controls whether assertions are enabled or not, a lot of debug code gets enabled in

On 08/12/2014 9:40 AM, G?bor Cs?rdi wrote: > Hi all, > > anyone has an idea how I could fix this? > > \donttest{ > ## Set colors from colorspace package with a fallback > col <- try(colorspace::rainbow_hcl(5), silent = TRUE) %||% rainbow(5) > } > > The problem is that this makes R CMD check freak out >

Sounds reasonable, but I leave it to wiser heads than me to decide. My only point is that whatever is done be accurately documented. At present, that does not appear to be the case. ... and yes, "accurate" documentation is not easy either. -- Bert On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 3:20?PM Ben Bolker <bbolker at gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks, I had missed/forgotten the fact that

I am new to linux, well almost. I found all of the recommended dev files from the Wine HQ recommendations for the Debian distro then followed the directions in the readme file that came with the source download. the ./configure make depend make commands appeared to work but I have a couple errors I don't know how to interpret. I checked the previous Wine install for the

On 06.06.2017 10:07, Martin Maechler wrote: >>>>>> Kirill M?ller <kirill.mueller at ivt.baug.ethz.ch> >>>>>> on Mon, 5 Jun 2017 17:30:20 +0200 writes: > > Hi I've noted a minor inconsistency in the documentation: > > Current R-exts reads > > > s = PROTECT_WITH_INDEX(eval(OS->R_fcall, OS->R_env), &ipx);

Thanks for looking into it, your approach sounds good to me. See also R_has_methods_attached() (https://github.com/wch/r-source/blob/42ecf5f492a005f5398cbb4c9becd4aa5af9d05c/src/main/objects.c#L258-L265). I'm fine with Rscript not loading "methods", as long as everything works properly with "methods" loaded but not attached. -Kirill On 19.04.2016 04:10, Michael

>>>>> Kirill M?ller <kirill.mueller at ivt.baug.ethz.ch> >>>>> on Thu, 8 Jun 2017 12:55:26 +0200 writes: > On 06.06.2017 22:14, Kirill M?ller wrote: >> >> >> On 06.06.2017 10:07, Martin Maechler wrote: >>>>>>>> Kirill M?ller <kirill.mueller at ivt.baug.ethz.ch> on

Hi I've noted a minor inconsistency in the documentation: Current R-exts reads s = PROTECT_WITH_INDEX(eval(OS->R_fcall, OS->R_env), &ipx); but I believe it has to be PROTECT_WITH_INDEX(s = eval(OS->R_fcall, OS->R_env), &ipx); because PROTECT_WITH_INDEX() returns void. Best regards Kirill

See also .isMethodsDispatchOn, which is what trace uses to decide if the methods package needs to be loaded. ~G On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 5:34 AM, Michael Lawrence <lawrence.michael at gene.com > wrote: > Not sure why R_has_methods_attached() exists. Maybe Martin could shed > some light on that. > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 11:50 PM, Kirill M?ller > <kirill.mueller at

Does it make sense to be able to load an S4 object without the methods package being attached? I'm not sure implementation-wise how easy this would be, but it seems like any time there is an S4 object around, the methods package should be available to deal with it. ~G On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 7:34 AM, Michael Lawrence <lawrence.michael at gene.com > wrote: > Right,

Scenario: An S3 method is declared for an S4 base class but called for an instance of a derived class. Steps to reproduce: > Rscript -e "test <- function(x) UseMethod('test', x); test.Matrix <- function(x) 'Hi'; MatrixDispatchTest::test(Matrix::Matrix())" Error in UseMethod("test", x) : no applicable method for 'test' applied to an

Hi Gordon, I wrote a small example, but while running I get an error("Tied to execute an unknown external function"), where I am wrong? Thanks in advance. Kirill. int some_test_func( int ){ std::cout << "!!!!" << std::endl; return 8848; } int _tmain(int argc, _TCHAR* argv[]){ Module *M = new Module("test"); ExistingModuleProvider* MP = new

Hello all. What we have: SL6 - kernel 2.6.32-131.2.1.el6.x86_64 btrfs on mdadm RAID5 with 8 HDD - 27T partition. I see this at top: 1182 root 20 0 0 0 0 R 100.0 0.0 16:39.73 [btrfs-delalloc-] And LA is grow. What is this and how can I fix it? -- Best regards, Proskurin Kirill -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of

Hi Accesses the $new method for a class defined in a package fails if the methods package is not loaded. I have created a test package with the following single code file: newTest <- function() { cl <- get("someClass") cl$new } someClass <- setRefClass("someClass") (This is similar to code actually used in the testthat package.) If methods is not loaded,

Hi Chris, Just in case that this information does not get corrupted I want to point to the issue: In http://llvm.org/devmtg/2008-08/Geoffray_VMKitProject.pdf it is on page 21: "VMKit, Mono, PNet", Array bounds checks. In http://hal.inria.fr/docs/00/35/45/77/PDF/RR-6799.pdf it is on page 17: "We compare N3 with Mono [9] version 1.2.6, and PNet version 0.7.4 [2], which uses

Hi It seems that names of the form "..#" and "..." are not fixed by make.names(), even though they are reserved words. The documentation reads: > [...] Names such as ".2way" are not valid, and neither are the reserved words. > Reserved words in R: [...] ... and ..1, ..2 etc, which are used to refer to arguments passed down from a calling function, see