similar to: Bug in the "reformulate" function in stats package

Well, first I can't sign in bugzilla myself, that is why I wrote here first. Also, I don't know if I have the time at the moment to provide tests, multiple examples or more. If that is not ok or welcomed, that is fine, I can come back, whenever I have more time to properly report the bug. I didn't find the existing bug report, sorry for that. Yes, it is related. My problem was

I suspect that the issue is addressed (obliquely) in the examples, which shows that variables with spaces in them (or otherwise 'non-syntactic', i.e. not satisfying the constraints of legal R symbols) can be handled by protecting them with backticks (``) ## using non-syntactic names: reformulate(c("`P/E`", "`% Growth`"), response = as.name("+-")) It

Proposed patch (I think .txt files work OK as attachments to the list?) On 2019-04-04 2:21 a.m., Martin Maechler wrote: >>>>>> Ben Bolker >>>>>> on Fri, 29 Mar 2019 12:34:50 -0400 writes: > > > I suspect that the issue is addressed (obliquely) in the examples, > > which shows that variables with spaces in them (or otherwise >

Hi, Sorry for writing this late, I was very busy. I started this discussion here. I wish I could write to bugs.r-project.org, but I don't have an account and I will write here instead. Meanwhile, I solved my problem with a simpler fix (please see attached file)/. / This requires that term labels are not "ticked". I think this is better, since it is easier to have column names

So here is it as txt file. It is funny that a R file is restricted in R-devel mailing list. Anyhow, in this case R-core have a few choices here: * ignore my solution * show that it is actually bad or worse * consider adding it Considering, that it is a minor change from previous version and doesn't bother the existing usage, I saw the necessity to submit it here. But newer solution

The main thing is to post the "small reproducible example". My (rather long term experience) can be written if (exists("reproducible example") ) { DeveloperFixHappens() } else { NULL } JN On 2019-03-29 11:38 a.m., Saren Tasciyan wrote: > Well, first I can't sign in bugzilla myself, that is why I wrote here first. Also, I don't know if I have the

>>>>> Saren Tasciyan >>>>> on Thu, 28 Mar 2019 17:02:10 +0100 writes: > Hi, > I have found a bug in reformulate function and have a solution for it. I > was wondering, where I can submit it? > Best, > Saren Well, you could have given a small reproducible example depicting the bug, notably when posting here: Just a prose

>>>>> Ben Bolker >>>>> on Fri, 29 Mar 2019 12:34:50 -0400 writes: > I suspect that the issue is addressed (obliquely) in the examples, > which shows that variables with spaces in them (or otherwise > 'non-syntactic', i.e. not satisfying the constraints of legal R symbols) > can be handled by protecting them with backticks

>>>>> Ben Bolker >>>>> on Thu, 4 Apr 2019 12:46:37 -0400 writes: > Proposed patch Thank you Ben! [the rest is technical nit-picking .. but hopefully interesting to the smart R-devel reader base:] There was a very subtle thinko in your patch which is not easily diagnosed from R's parse_Rd(): Error in

Your file didn't make it through the mailing list (which is quite restrictive about which types/extensions it will take). I appreciate your enthusiasm and persistence for this issue, but I suspect you may have trouble convincing R-core to adopt your changes -- they are "better", "easier", "more intuitive" for you ... but how sure are you they are completely

Hi, Yes I am aware of it. And yes, I have libicu60 installed. Is it the configure script making a mistake? Best, Saren On 11/22/19 4:12 PM, Jeroen Ooms wrote: > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 2:58 PM Saren Tasciyan <saren.tasciyan at ist.ac.at> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am trying to build a more recent version (3.6.1 or 3.5.3) of R on >> Ubuntu 18.04 LTS. > Are you

Hi, I am trying to build a more recent version (3.6.1 or 3.5.3) of R on Ubuntu 18.04 LTS. I have installed build-deps with: sudo apt-get build-dep r-base and I ran ./configure During "make", I get the following error: platform.o: In function `do_eSoftVersion': /home/user/Desktop/R-3.6.1/src/main/platform.c:3129: undefined reference to `u_getVersion_58'

On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 2:58 PM Saren Tasciyan <saren.tasciyan at ist.ac.at> wrote: > > Hi, > > I am trying to build a more recent version (3.6.1 or 3.5.3) of R on > Ubuntu 18.04 LTS. Are you aware you can get up-to-date binaries either from PPA or CRAN: sudo add-apt-repository ppa:marutter/rrutter sudo apt-get install r-base-dev > and I ran ./configure > During

Hi folks, when I try to do something like: define railsproject($name, $uid, $gid, $userpass, $sqlpass) { mysql_database { "$name_staging": ensure => present } mysql_database { "$name_production": ensure => present} ....more stuff... } I get: Puppet::Parser::AST::Resource failed with error ArgumentError: Duplicate definition: Mysql_database[] is already

Hey! Our flac's official website is looking so old, isn't it? Let's reformulate it. I wanna do this, anyone else? Regards, Lucas Correia -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/attachments/20091118/cabc7c52/attachment.htm

Hi, are there any good ways of scripting an inventory of managed resources on all nodes? I''ve found the inventory script by R.I.Pienaar ( http://www.devco.net/archives/2010/02/26/what_does_puppet_manage_on_a_node-2.php) which does what I want but only locally on each client. Is there any native way of syncing the client_yaml data centrally or any other way of doing this? I need a

Hi. I am aware of three different R packages for linear programming: glpk, linprog, lpSolve. From what I can tell, if there are N variables and M constraints, all these solvers require the full NxM constraint matrix. Some linear solvers I know of (not in R) have a sparse matrix input format. Are there any linear solvers in R that have a sparse matrix input format? (including the

On Jul 25, 2011, at 3:22 PM, Jason Kim wrote: > On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 9:54 AM, FlyLanguage <flylanguage at gmail.com> wrote: > Lot of good points. > > > Yep, switching to git would require a lot of work on the project > > maintainers' side. Commit hooks, setting up repositories, rewording > > policies in terms of the commands of the new tools, and that

hi, is there an option to calculate the 'within' & 'between' group variances for a simple ANOVA (aov) model (2 groups, 1 trait, normally distr.) ? or do I have to calculate them from the Sum Sq ? thanks for your time and greetings, gregor -- Gregor Rolshausen PhD Student; University of Freiburg, Germany e-mail: gregor.rolshausen at biologie.uni-freiburg.de tel. :

Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> writes: > On Jul 25, 2011, at 3:22 PM, Jason Kim wrote: > Great point. A potential conversion to git should be motivated by its > benefits - assuming no development policy change - and that benefit > needs to be greater than the various costs of conversion. Here are the most important benefits I see for the LLVM projects: - git greatly