similar to: stopifnot

>>>>> Suharto Anggono Suharto Anggono >>>>> on Tue, 5 Mar 2019 17:29:20 +0000 writes: > Another possible shortcut definition: > assert <- function(exprs) > do.call("stopifnot", list(exprs = substitute(exprs), local = parent.frame())) Thank you. I think this is mostly a matter of taste, but I liked your version using eval()

Another possible shortcut definition: assert <- function(exprs) do.call("stopifnot", list(exprs = substitute(exprs), local = parent.frame())) After thinking again, I propose to use ??? ? ? stop(simpleError(msg, call = if(p <- sys.parent()) sys.call(p))) - It seems that the call is the call of the frame where stopifnot(...) is evaluated. Because that is the correct context, I

A private reply by Martin made me realize that I was wrong about stopifnot(exprs=TRUE) . It actually works fine. I apologize. What I tried and was failed was stopifnot(exprs=T) . Error in exprs[[1]] : object of type 'symbol' is not subsettable The shortcut assert <- function(exprs) stopifnot(exprs = exprs) mentioned in "Warning" section of the documentation similarly fails

Ah, with R 3.5.0 or R 3.4.2, but not with R 3.3.1, 'eval' inside 'for' makes compiled version behave like non-compiled version. options(error = expression(NULL)) library(compiler) enableJIT(0) f <- function(x) for (i in 1) {x; eval(expression(i))} f(is.numeric(y)) # Error: object 'y' not found fc <- cmpfun(f) fc(is.numeric(y)) # Error: object 'y' not found

My points: - The 'withCallingHandlers' construct that is used in current 'stopifnot' code has no effect. Without it, the warning message is the same. The overridden warning is not raised. The original warning stays. - Overriding call in error and warning to 'cl.i' doesn't always give better outcome. The original call may be "narrower" than 'cl.i'. I

With f <- function(x) for (i in 1) x fc <- cmpfun(f) (my previous example), error message of fc(is.numeric(y)) shows the originating call as well, while error message of f(is.numeric(y)) doesn't. Compiled version behaves differently. Even with f <- function(x) for (i in 1) {x; eval(expression(i))} fc <- cmpfun(f) , error message of fc(is.numeric(y)) shows the originating call in R

>>>>> Suharto Anggono Suharto Anggono >>>>> on Thu, 30 May 2019 14:45:22 +0000 writes: >>>>> Suharto Anggono Suharto Anggono >>>>> on Thu, 30 May 2019 14:45:22 +0000 writes: > Here is a patch to function 'stopifnot' that adds 'evaluated' argument and makes 'exprs' argument in 'stopifnot'

>From https://github.com/HenrikBengtsson/Wishlist-for-R/issues/70 : ... and follow up note from 2018-03-15: Ouch... in R-devel, stopifnot() has become yet 4-5 times slower; ... which is due to a complete rewrite using tryCatch() and withCallingHandlers(). >From https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2017-May/074256.html , it seems that 'tryCatch' was used to avoid the following

In current definition of function 'stopifnot' in stop.R in R 3.6.0 beta (https://svn.r-project.org/R/branches/R-3-6-branch/src/library/base/R/stop.R) or R devel (https://svn.r-project.org/R/trunk/src/library/base/R/stop.R), if 'exprs' is specified, cl[[1]] is quote(stopifnot) . To be more robust, quote(base::stopifnot) may be used instead. Also, in current definition of function

On Mon, 1 Apr 2019, Martin Maechler wrote: >>>>>> Suharto Anggono Suharto Anggono via R-devel >>>>>> on Sun, 31 Mar 2019 15:26:13 +0000 writes: > > > Ah, with R 3.5.0 or R 3.4.2, but not with R 3.3.1, 'eval' > > inside 'for' makes compiled version behave like > > non-compiled version. > > Ah.. ... thank

>>>>> Suharto Anggono Suharto Anggono via R-devel >>>>> on Sun, 31 Mar 2019 15:26:13 +0000 writes: > Ah, with R 3.5.0 or R 3.4.2, but not with R 3.3.1, 'eval' > inside 'for' makes compiled version behave like > non-compiled version. Ah.. ... thank you for detecting that " eval() inside for()" behaves specially

Instead of if(!is.null(names(cl))) names(cl) <- NULL , just names(cl) <- NULL looks simpler and the memory usage and speed is not bad in my little experiment. -------------------------------------------- Subject: Re: [Rd] stopifnot To: r-devel at r-project.org Date: Saturday, 2 March, 2019, 3:28 PM [...] A revised patch (also with simpler 'cl'): --- stop.R 2019-02-27

>>>>> Suharto Anggono Suharto Anggono via R-devel <r-devel at r-project.org> >>>>> on Thu, 18 May 2017 16:27:09 +0000 writes: >> From an example in >> http://www.uni-muenster.de/ZIV.BennoSueselbeck/s-html/helpfiles/nargs.html >> , number of arguments in '...' can be obtained by > (function(...)nargs())(...) .

Here is a patch to function 'stopifnot' that adds 'evaluated' argument and makes 'exprs' argument in 'stopifnot' like 'exprs' argument in 'withAutoprint'. --- stop.R 2019-05-30 14:01:15.282197286 +0000 +++ stop_new.R 2019-05-30 14:01:51.372187466 +0000 @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ .Internal(stop(call., .makeMessage(..., domain = domain))) }

While you are fiddling with stopifnot(), please consider changing the form of the error thrown so that it includes the caller's call. The change would be from something like stop( <<the message>> ) to stop(simpleError( <<the message>>, sys.call(-1))) For the following code f <- function(x, y) { stopifnot(x > y) x - y } g <- function(x,

> On 16 May 2017, at 18:37 , Suharto Anggono Suharto Anggono via R-devel <r-devel at r-project.org> wrote: > > switch(i, ...) > extracts 'i'-th argument in '...'. It is like > eval(as.name(paste0("..", i))) . Hey, that's pretty neat! -pd > > Just mentioning other things: > - For 'n', > n <- nargs() > can be used.

>From an example in http://www.uni-muenster.de/ZIV.BennoSueselbeck/s-html/helpfiles/nargs.html , number of arguments in '...' can be obtained by (function(...)nargs())(...) . I now realize that sys.call() doesn't expand '...' when the function is called with '...'. It just returns the call as is. If 'stopifnot' uses sys.call() instead of match.call() , the

Hi, On 05/15/2017 10:41 AM, luke-tierney at uiowa.edu wrote: > This is getting pretty convoluted. > > The current behavior is consistent with the description at the top of > the help page -- it does not promise to stop evaluation once the first > non-TRUE is found. That seems OK to me -- if you want sequencing you > can use > > stopifnot(A) > stopifnot(B) > > or

>>>>> Serguei Sokol <sokol at insa-toulouse.fr> >>>>> on Mon, 15 May 2017 16:32:20 +0200 writes: > Le 15/05/2017 ? 15:37, Martin Maechler a ?crit : >>>>>>> Serguei Sokol <sokol at insa-toulouse.fr> >>>>>>> on Mon, 15 May 2017 13:14:34 +0200 writes: >> > I see in the archives that

On Tue, 16 May 2017, Martin Maechler wrote: >>>>>> Herv? Pag?s <hpages at fredhutch.org> >>>>>> on Mon, 15 May 2017 16:54:46 -0700 writes: > > > Hi, > > On 05/15/2017 10:41 AM, luke-tierney at uiowa.edu wrote: > >> This is getting pretty convoluted. > >> > >> The current behavior is consistent