similar to: Package inclusion in R core implementation

As the original coder (in mid 1970s) of BFGS, CG and Nelder-Mead in optim(), I've been pushing for some time for their deprecation. They aren't "bad", but we have better tools, and they are in CRAN packages. Similarly, I believe other optimization tools in the core (optim::L-BFGS-B, nlm, nlminb) can and should be moved to packages (there are already 2 versions at least of LBFGS

On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 5:01 PM J C Nash <profjcnash at gmail.com> wrote: > As the original coder (in mid 1970s) of BFGS, CG and Nelder-Mead in > optim(), I've > been pushing for some time for their deprecation. They aren't "bad", but > we have > better tools, and they are in CRAN packages. Similarly, I believe other > optimization > tools in the core

I concur with Avraham that capabilities need to be ensured e.g., in recommended packages. I should have mentioned that. My concern is that the core should be focused on the programming language aspects. The computational math and some of the more intricate data management could better be handled by folk outside the core. JN On 2019-03-04 9:12 a.m., Avraham Adler wrote: > On Mon, Mar 4, 2019

Conversely, what is the process to remove a package from core R? It seems to me some (many?) of the packages included are there more out of historical accident rather than any technical need to be in the core distribution. Having them as a core (or recommended) package makes them harder update independently to R and makes testing, development and contribution more cumbersome. On Fri, Mar 1, 2019

Hi, Hope you are well. I was wondering if there is a function at C level that is equivalent to mtcars$carb or .subset2(mtcars, "carb"). If I have the index of the column then the answer would be VECTOR_ELT(df, asInteger(idx)) but I was wondering if there is a way to do it directly from the name of the column without having to loop over columns names to find the index? Thank you Best

I think you are confusing package and function here. Plus some of the R Core packages, that you mention, contain functions that should probably be replaced by functions with better implementation from packages on CRAN. Best regards Morgan On Fri, 11 Oct 2019 15:22 Joris Meys, <jorismeys at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 3:55 PM Morgan Morgan <morgan.emailbox

How do you prove usefulness of a feature? Do you have an example of a feature that has been added after proving to be useful in the package space first? Thank you, Morgan On Fri, 11 Oct 2019 13:53 Michael Lawrence, <lawrence.michael at gene.com> wrote: > Thanks for this interesting suggestion, Morgan. While there is no strict > criteria for base R inclusion, one criterion relevant

https://github.com/jimhester/archive was not allowed on CRAN when I submitted it 3 years ago due to this restriction. Being able to write custom connections is a useful feature for a number of applications, I would love this policy to be reconsidered. On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 10:30 PM Henrik Bengtsson <henrik.bengtsson at gmail.com> wrote: > What's the gist of the problem of

On 6/30/20 1:06 PM, Jan Gorecki wrote: > It is quite known that R documentation on R C api could be improved... Please see "5.11 Evaluating R expressions from C" from "Writing R Extensions" Best Tomas > Still R-package-devel mailing list should be preferred for this kind > of questions. > Not sure if that is the best way, but works. > > call_to_sum <-

> On Wednesday, May 20, 2020, 7:00:09 AM EDT, peter dalgaard <pdalgd at gmail.com> wrote: > > Expected, see FAQ 7.31. > > You just can't trust == on FP operations. Notice also Additionally, since you're implementing a "mean" function you are testing against R's mean, you might want to consider that R uses a two-pass calculation[1] to reduce floating

On Fri, 11 Oct 2019 10:45 Duncan Murdoch, <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote: > On 11/10/2019 6:44 a.m., Morgan Morgan wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > I was looking for a function to find a small matrix inside a larger > matrix > > in R similar to the one described in the following link: > > > > >

Hi, I am wondering if the below is possible? Let's assume I have the following expression: 1:10 < 5 Is there a way at the R C API level to only evaluate the 5th element (i.e 5 < 5) instead of evaluating the whole expression and then select the 5th element in the logical vector? Thank you Best regards Morgan [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hello R-dev, Yesterday, while I was testing the newly implemented function pmean in package kit, I noticed a mismatch in the output of the below R expressions. set.seed(123) n=1e3L idx=5 x=rnorm(n) y=rnorm(n) z=rnorm(n) a=(x[idx]+y[idx]+z[idx])/3 b=mean(c(x[idx],y[idx],z[idx])) a==b # [1] FALSE For idx= 1, 2, 3, 4 the last line is equal to TRUE. For 5, 6 and many others the difference is small

Hi, Is there a way to resize a matrix defined as follows: SEXP a = PROTECT(allocMatrix(INTSXP, 10, 2)); int *pa = INTEGER(a) To row = 5 and col = 1 or do I have to allocate a second matrix "b" with pointer *pb and do a "for" loop to transfer the value of a to b? Thank you Best regards Morgan [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi All, I was reading the R extension manual section 5.11 ( Evaluating R expression from C) and I tried to build a simple call to the sum function. Please see below. call_to_sum <- inline::cfunction( language = "C", sig = c(x = "SEXP"), body = " SEXP e = PROTECT(lang2(install(\"sum\"), x)); SEXP ans = PROTECT(eval(e, R_GlobalEnv)); UNPROTECT(2); return

Hi, Using the R C PAI, is there a way to convert to convert STRSXP or INTSXP to factor. The idea would be to do in C something similar to the "factor" function (example below): > letters[1:5] # [1] "a" "b" "c" "d" "e" > factor(letters[1:5]) # [1] a b c d e # Levels: a b c d e There is the function setAttrib the levels of a SXP

Hi All, I have some questions regarding the R C API. Let's assume I have a function which is defined as follows: R file: myfunc <- function(a, b, ...) .External(Cfun, a, b, ...) C file: SEXP Cfun(SEXP args) { args = CDR(args); SEXP a = CAR(args); args = CDR(args); SEXP b = CAR(args); args = CDR(args); /* continue to do something with remaining arguments in "..."

Also note that the functionality discussed could be regarded as a generalization of matrix multiplication where * and + are general functions and in this case we have * replaced by == and + replaced by &. On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 10:46 AM Gabor Grothendieck <ggrothendieck at gmail.com> wrote: > > Using the example in the link here are two one-liners: > > A <-

First, thank you to Tomas for writing his recent post[0] on the R developer blog. It raised important issues in interfacing R's C API and C++ code. However I do _not_ think the conclusion reached in the post is helpful > don?t use C++ to interface with R There are now more than 1,600 packages on CRAN using C++, the time is long past when that type of warning is going to be useful to the

Hi All, I was looking for a function to find a small matrix inside a larger matrix in R similar to the one described in the following link: https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/answers/194708-index-a-small-matrix-in-a-larger-matrix I couldn't find anything. The above function can be seen as a "generalisation" of the "which" function as well as the function described