similar to: Compile R to WebAssembly / Emscripten?

As I recall, the major blocker is that R links against a number of other things (notably BLAS, pcre, etc) so while technically possible (?) I suppose, the universe of things you'd have to compile over and then get working is much larger than just the R internals. I think most people who consider this (including me years ago, as well as the poster of Gabor's message to rdevel) hit that

This was some time ago: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2013-May/066724.html So probably not hopeless, but I would think it is a lot of work. Gabor On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 8:17 AM Todd Wilder <wildert at gmail.com> wrote: > > Has anyone attempted to compile R (probably without any OS bindings) to > WebAssembly / Emscripten? If so, how far did you get? (would be crazy >

Okay, so where should I send questions for WebAssembly? Is it this mailing list or a different one? I want to ask about how to compile WebAssembly modules with Clang directly, without Emscripten, for situations like what I have currently where I have a problem with generating WebAssembly and/or JavaScript glue code (I have a problem with the gen_struct_info stuff; I asked on the Emscripten

Hi llvmers, As you may know, work has been progressing on the experimental WebAssembly backend in llvm. However, there is currently not a good linking story. Most the of existing linking strategies (i.e. those in the emscripten toolchain) involve bitcode linking and whole program compilation at link time. To improve this situation I've been working on adding a wasm backend for lld. My

> > This seems interesting, I have a few questions: > > > Has the ISA been finalized yet or is it still a work in progress? Will > there be a fixed number of registers? > The design document has a high-level idea of the ISA, or rather of the AST we're thinking of going with: https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/blob/master/AstSemantics.md The final encoding isn't

Can you link to docs about the wasm object format? (both relocatable and executable) Also, traditional object file linkers are primarily concerned with concatenating binary blobs with small amount of patching of said binary blobs based on computed virtual (memory) addresses. Or perhaps to put it another way, what traditional object file linkers do is construct program images meant to be mapped

Hi everyone, I wanted to mention a project using LLVM: Emscripten. Emscripten is an open source LLVM to JavaScript compiler, http://emscripten.org https://github.com/kripken/emscripten/ There are various demos linked to on the wiki (the first link), of various large C/C++ codebases compiled to JS and running on the web, like Python, Bullet, Poppler, etc. Emscripten is not a

On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 4:10 PM, Alon Zakai <azakai at mozilla.com> wrote: > On that topic, I see there is an LLVM users page, > > http://llvm.org/Users.html > > - what is the procedure for suggesting adding a project to > there? Send a patch to llvm-commits. > The third issue I want to raise is regarding closer > integration with LLVM. Right now, Emscripten uses

On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Alon Zakai <azakai at mozilla.com> wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Eli Friedman" <eli.friedman at gmail.com> >> To: "Alon Zakai" <azakai at mozilla.com> >> Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu >> Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 7:02:34 PM >> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Emscripten:

Hi xiph, I'm trying to compile libopus from git.xiph.org/opus.git with emscripten. The regular: $ emconfigure ./configure --enable-fixed-point $ emmake make gets me quite far, but it hangs on the use of __malloc_hook in the tests: tests/test_opus_api.c:1776:16: error: use of undeclared identifier '__malloc_hook'; did you mean 'malloc_hook'? orig_malloc=__malloc_hook;

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Eli Friedman" <eli.friedman at gmail.com> > To: "Alon Zakai" <azakai at mozilla.com> > Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 7:02:34 PM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Emscripten: LLVM => JavaScript > On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 4:10 PM, Alon Zakai <azakai at mozilla.com> > wrote: >

Hi Sam, First, I want to know the symbol resolution semantics. I can imagine that that is set in stone yet, but just that you guys are still discussing what would be the best semantics or file format for the linkable wasm object file. I think by knowing more about the format and semantics, we can give you guys valuable feedback, as we've been actively working on the linker for a few years

Apologies if there is a better forum for these questions. Please redirect me if so. I’ve been using the clang/wasm-ld tools to experiment with some basic examples, and there’s a couple things I’m wrestling with. 1) How to denote a function as the “start” function (https://webassembly.github.io/spec/core/binary/modules.html#start-section) 2) How to avoid the defaulted __heap_base global. I’ve

Hi there, We are interested in adopting Opus into our web based application for speech recording. I'm wondering if there is a plan to port Opus encoder and decoder to Javascript using Emscripten in the near future? Best Regards, Rachel Wu ETS.org ________________________________ This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or confidential information. It is solely

Hi all, First off, apologies if this list is not the correct place for this message. Although we have used Xapian with our email services for a long time (over 10 years) we haven't had the opportunity to contribute or participate in the Xapian community until now. We might therefore not be entirely familiar with acceptable protocol here, but we thought others might be interested in a new

Hello all, WebAssembly [0] its a new virtual ISA being designed to efficiently run compiled code in web browsers and other things, starting with C/C++, and eventually many other languages [1]. WebAssembly distinguishes itself from other virtual ISAs with optimizations to reduce download size and decode time, strong portability and predictability invariants (for example, the base has no undefined

wasm-ld is currently unable to link a shared wasm library (generated with `wasm-ld --shared`) with .o files and produce a working executable. I'm curious if there's a fundamental reason for this, or is this simply something that wasn't needed and could be implemented if needed. I think this could be done by - Resolving "GOT.mem" and "GOT.func" imports and

I get the following message when cross compiling Opus 1.2.1 for android with clang in a standalone build.   CC       src/opus_decoder.lo src/opus_decoder.c:37:10: warning: You appear to be compiling without optimization, if so opus will be very slow. [-W#pragma-messages] # pragma message "You appear to be compiling without optimization, if so opus will be very slow." Looking at the

Hi, Sorry if you've seen this message before on llvm.discourse.group or elsewhere -- I've been trying to get to the bottom of this for a while now and asked about this in a few different platforms before. I'm currently trying to debug a bug in a LLVM-generated Wasm code. The bug could be in the code that generates LLVM (rustc) or in the LLVM, I'm not sure yet. LLVM IR and Wasm

Hello. Excuse me. Why CMakeLists.txt from llvm-3.9.1.src does not contain WebAssembly target? So, it is like set(LLVM_ALL_TARGETS AArch64 AMDGPU ARM BPF Hexagon Mips MSP430 NVPTX PowerPC Sparc SystemZ X86 XCore ) but not like set(LLVM_ALL_TARGETS AArch64 AMDGPU ARM BPF Hexagon Mips MSP430 NVPTX PowerPC Sparc SystemZ Webassembly X86