similar to: Compiler + stopifnot bug

On 03/01/2019 3:37 p.m., Duncan Murdoch wrote: > I see this too; by bisection, it seems to have first appeared in r72943. Sorry, that was a typo. I meant r75943. Duncan Murdoch > > Duncan Murdoch > > On 03/01/2019 2:18 p.m., I?aki Ucar wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I found the following issue in r-devel (2019-01-02 r75945): >> >> `foo<-` <-

Thanks for the reports. Will look into it soon and report back. Luke Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 3, 2019, at 2:15 PM, Martin Morgan <mtmorgan.bioc at gmail.com> wrote: > > For what it's worth this also introduced > >> df = data.frame(v = package_version("1.2")) >> rbind(df, df)$v > [[1]] > [1] 1 2 > > [[2]] > [1] 1 2

For what it's worth this also introduced > df = data.frame(v = package_version("1.2")) > rbind(df, df)$v [[1]] [1] 1 2 [[2]] [1] 1 2 instead of > rbind(df, df)$v [1] '1.2' '1.2' which shows up in Travis builds of Bioconductor packages https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/bioc-devel/2019-January/014506.html and elsewhere

Should be fixed in r75946. Best, luke On Fri, 4 Jan 2019, Tierney, Luke wrote: > Thanks for the reports. Will look into it soon and report back. > > Luke > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Jan 3, 2019, at 2:15 PM, Martin Morgan <mtmorgan.bioc at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> For what it's worth this also introduced >> >>> df = data.frame(v =

Ah, with R 3.5.0 or R 3.4.2, but not with R 3.3.1, 'eval' inside 'for' makes compiled version behave like non-compiled version. options(error = expression(NULL)) library(compiler) enableJIT(0) f <- function(x) for (i in 1) {x; eval(expression(i))} f(is.numeric(y)) # Error: object 'y' not found fc <- cmpfun(f) fc(is.numeric(y)) # Error: object 'y' not found

On Mon, 1 Apr 2019, Martin Maechler wrote: >>>>>> Suharto Anggono Suharto Anggono via R-devel >>>>>> on Sun, 31 Mar 2019 15:26:13 +0000 writes: > > > Ah, with R 3.5.0 or R 3.4.2, but not with R 3.3.1, 'eval' > > inside 'for' makes compiled version behave like > > non-compiled version. > > Ah.. ... thank

With f <- function(x) for (i in 1) x fc <- cmpfun(f) (my previous example), error message of fc(is.numeric(y)) shows the originating call as well, while error message of f(is.numeric(y)) doesn't. Compiled version behaves differently. Even with f <- function(x) for (i in 1) {x; eval(expression(i))} fc <- cmpfun(f) , error message of fc(is.numeric(y)) shows the originating call in R

>>>>> Suharto Anggono Suharto Anggono via R-devel >>>>> on Sun, 31 Mar 2019 15:26:13 +0000 writes: > Ah, with R 3.5.0 or R 3.4.2, but not with R 3.3.1, 'eval' > inside 'for' makes compiled version behave like > non-compiled version. Ah.. ... thank you for detecting that " eval() inside for()" behaves specially

By not using 'withCallingHandler' or 'tryCatch', the state is like 'stopifnot' in R 3.4.x. If 'stopifnot' becomes faster than in R 3.4.x when the expressions given to 'stopifnot' are all TRUE, it is because 'match.call' is not called. Credit is to https://github.com/HenrikBengtsson/Wishlist-for-R/issues/70 for the idea. Speaking about

If an expression is passed to stopifnot() which contains missing values, then the resulting error message is somewhat baffling until you are used to it, e.g. > x <- y <- rep(TRUE, 10) > y[7] <- NA > stopifnot(x, y) Error in if (!(is.logical(r <- eval(ll[[i]])) && all(r))) stop(paste(deparse(mc[[i + : missing value where TRUE/FALSE needed A minor change to

>From https://github.com/HenrikBengtsson/Wishlist-for-R/issues/70 : ... and follow up note from 2018-03-15: Ouch... in R-devel, stopifnot() has become yet 4-5 times slower; ... which is due to a complete rewrite using tryCatch() and withCallingHandlers(). >From https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2017-May/074256.html , it seems that 'tryCatch' was used to avoid the following

I think Herv?'s idea was just that if switch can evaluate arguments selectively, so can stopifnot(). But switch() is .Primitive, so does it from C. I think it is almost a no-brainer to implement a sequential stopifnot if dropping to C code is allowed. In R it gets trickier, but how about this: Stopifnot <- function(...) { n <- length(match.call()) - 1 for (i in 1:n) { nm

Here is a patch to function 'stopifnot' that adds 'evaluated' argument and makes 'exprs' argument in 'stopifnot' like 'exprs' argument in 'withAutoprint'. --- stop.R 2019-05-30 14:01:15.282197286 +0000 +++ stop_new.R 2019-05-30 14:01:51.372187466 +0000 @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ .Internal(stop(call., .makeMessage(..., domain = domain))) }

Why don't you use stopifnot( all(m1 == m2) ) ? Bill Dunlap TIBCO Software wdunlap tibco.com On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 8:15 AM, Stepan Kasal <kasal at ucw.cz> wrote: > Hello, > I stumbled over a problem: > stopifnot(m1 == m2) > > It works with vector or matrix, but does not work for classes from Matrix > package. > > In the source of stopifnot(), there is

switch(i, ...) extracts 'i'-th argument in '...'. It is like eval(as.name(paste0("..", i))) . Just mentioning other things: - For 'n', n <- nargs() can be used. - sys.call() can be used in place of match.call() . --------------------------- >>>>> peter dalgaard <pdalgd at gmail.com> >>>>> on Mon, 15 May 2017 16:28:42

Hello, I stumbled over a problem: stopifnot(m1 == m2) It works with vector or matrix, but does not work for classes from Matrix package. In the source of stopifnot(), there is all(m1 == m2) that would just work, but there is also is.logical(m1 == m2) that id FALSE. Would it be possible if Matrix package redefined stopifnot() ? (If there is a bug tracking database for package Matrix, I would

Hi, It's surprising that stopifnot() keeps evaluating its arguments after it reaches the first one that is not TRUE: > stopifnot(3 == 5, as.integer(2^32), a <- 12) Error: 3 == 5 is not TRUE In addition: Warning message: In stopifnot(3 == 5, as.integer(2^32), a <- 12) : NAs introduced by coercion to integer range > a [1] 12 The details section in its man

Please stop this line of queries/"suggestions/speculations and read the relevant docs **carefully**. For example, from ?"==" "Note Do not use == and != for tests, such as in if expressions, where you must get a single TRUE or FALSE. Unless you are absolutely sure that nothing unusual can happen, you should use the identical

While you are fiddling with stopifnot(), please consider changing the form of the error thrown so that it includes the caller's call. The change would be from something like stop( <<the message>> ) to stop(simpleError( <<the message>>, sys.call(-1))) For the following code f <- function(x, y) { stopifnot(x > y) x - y } g <- function(x,

Not sure why the performance penalty of nonstandard evaluation would be more of a concern here than for something like switch(). If that can't/won't be fixed, what about fixing the man page so it's in sync with the current behavior? Thanks, H. On 05/03/2017 02:26 AM, peter dalgaard wrote: > The first line of stopifnot is > > n <- length(ll <- list(...)) > >