Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "Multiple ISPs"
2009 Mar 04
1
MultiWAN & Vlans
Hello,
I''m trying to setup an 8 port wan configuration (pptp+pppoe) with one vlan trunk.
My internal networks are :
LAN(eth9): 10.0.0.0/16
VLAN10(eth9) 10.10.0.0/24
VLAN20(eth9) 10.20.0.0/24
VLAN30(eth9) 10.30.0.0/24
VLAN100(eth9) 10.100.0.0/24
I would like to post my configuration here since i don''t success to do the following:
1. Communicate between VLANxx to LAN
2005 Aug 16
1
Multipath Routing..
Ok folks, here goes..
I have been boggling with a problem for the past week, and still haven''t
found a solution..
I''m trying to route traffic from two providers through a Linux machine.
But that is not the problem. The ISP''s have provided me with a WAN IP
class for both of the lines, to be routed into a DMZ where the machines
a to respond to their respective
2005 Jun 08
2
General Traffic Control Question
Here''s my situation:
I''ve got an Intel machine running a 2.6.9 linux kernel and this box has
4 modems attached to it via a usb to serial port expander. In order to
force data down each of the modems, some pretty simple rules are used
and they are as follows:
iptables -t mangle -A OUTPUT -p tcp --dport $PORT1 -j MARK --set-mark 1
iptables -t mangle -A OUTPUT -p tcp --dport
2005 Jan 21
0
equal cost multipath routing and incoming services...
We''re trying to figure out how to have equal cost multipath routing using OSPF (quagga) and have come up with the following...
Has anyone done something similar? -- How do you deal with incoming services (mail/web/etc) in such a scenario as below - And does anyone have any suggestions?
There''s more detail below....
Diagram and overview:
Network A connects to Core1 and Core2
2004 Apr 23
0
routing policy question
I''m attempting to perform some class based routing
using Linux in combination with quagga/zebra. My current
experience is with FreeBSD/ipfw/quagga.
I''ve read most of the LARTC documentation as well
Martin Brown''s Guide to IP Layer Network Admin.
Here''s the basics of my set up:
|- R1 <-> ISP1
R0-|
|- R2 <-> ISP2
|
|- R3
2013 Dec 03
5
Multiple ISP + traffic shapping = poor download speed
Hello,
Thanks for the great Shorewall which has replaced my hard to maintain home-made scripts.
First, what works.
Our local network is 10.48.X.X with multiple vlan, each on a dedicated interface. We use Shorewall 4.4.11 from Debian Squeeze.
We have a 2 ISP:
- isp1 : an optical fiber provider with 10 Mbps.
- isp2 : a DSL provider with 15Mbits/1Mbits.
We use isp2 as the default outgoing
2004 Dec 02
11
another network to add
Hi Tom (and others)
encase you don''t know my network already ;) here''s a quick run down
eth0 lan 192.168.1.1/255.255.255.0
eth1 wan1 172.30.7.4/255.255.240.0
eth2 wan2 202.37.230.93/255.255.255.192
eth3 wan3 203.96.213.73/255.255.254.0
I''ve got routes and rules for all the above interfaces :)
I want to add another one, however I fear this might cause some issues
I have
2004 Dec 03
1
Re: Shorewall-users Digest, Vol 25, Issue 9
> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 10:10:35 +1300
> From: Paul <lists@loudas.com>
> Subject: [Shorewall-users] another network to add
> To: Shorewall List <shorewall-users@lists.shorewall.net>
> Message-ID: <41AF84CB.5080304@loudas.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Hi Tom (and others)
> encase you
2003 Feb 06
2
Strange routing limitations and workaroud
Hi!
I got some strange problem with routing loadbalancing.
I cannot get the full speed from my ISPs until I get some big files from
close ftp server.
I have server with one connection to internal network and 3 to ISPs:
__________
| eth1|---- ISP1
| |
internal--|eth0 eth2|---- ISP2
net | |
(~300 | eth3|---- ISP3
hosts
2007 Jun 25
32
Load Balance and SNAT problem.
I am developing load balancing router, But I have a question about fail
over.
The follow diagram is my test environment and scripts.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Environment Setting
PC1(192.168.10.2)
|
(LAN)
|
PC2-eth2(192.168.10.1)
+
2011 Sep 02
0
Trying to plan for new multi-isp setup
I''m trying to plan out a new configuration for our new multi-isp setup. Part
of what is confusing me is the asymmetry between the two setups. Our current
ISP provides us with a router and our first public IP is used by its LAN port.
Our new provider is not providing a router and I want to user our shorewall
box as the router. I have 4 ports on it (currently configured for local,
2007 Sep 25
1
Local server unreachable by remote lan in dual isp configuration
hi all,
i have this situation:
isp1
|
dmz ----- FW linux ----- isp2
|----------------------------------- vpn
concentrator ----- various ipsec lan-2-lan
|
LAN
In lan i have "pc zone" and "server zone", same network.
Dmz and server zone browse internet through isp1, lan use isp2, and
remote
2003 Sep 18
3
Multiple Links
Hi all
Iam planning to deploy Multiple Links
using RH 9.0/ PIII 500Mhz/512MB RAM
With all Patches related to Route and rest Mentioned in nano.txt
Iam Running BGP 4 with all the ISP, but iam not doing Load balancing the
Links
Each Link have specific application and specific users.
Eth0 is connected to Local Net
eth1- ISP1
eth2- ISP2
eth3- ISP3
Now i want to make Specific Routes
x.x.x.x
2006 May 10
0
Problem with routing 2 isps with 2.6.15 kernel
Doing routing based on this:
http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html
Have done it for over a year.
Tried a new 2.6.15 kernel.
Firewall is based on debian sarge.
Most things work ok dnat snat etc.
Can simultaneous ssh in to an internal host via both isps with no problems.
At the moment the default route is via eth2.
root@fonroute:~# ip rule
0: from all lookup local
200:
2004 Apr 04
2
2 ISP Routing Problem
Hello,I have single linux router ( fedora core 1 ), 2 ISP, 1 internal
network,1 IP space from every ISP
My scenario:
eth0 1.0.0.2 netmask 255.255.255.252 -> ISP 1
eth1 2.0.0.2 netmask 255.255.255.252 -> ISP 2
eth2 1.0.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 -> IP space from ISP1
eth3 2.0.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 -> IP space from ISP2
Config I try:
/etc/iproute2/rt_tables:
10 isp1
20 isp2
ip
2005 Apr 06
2
Multipath routing + traffic separation problem.
Hello,
I have set up a multipath gateway.
System is a linux 2.4.29 kernel, iproute 20010824, iptables 1.2.11.
here is the setup:
firewall:/# ip rule
0: from all lookup local
100: from all lookup main
152: from all fwmark 10 lookup wan1
153: from all fwmark 20 lookup wan2
201: from 213.223.96.121 lookup wan1
202: from 82.236.230.217 lookup wan2
1000: from
2006 May 30
11
Problems with Routing and Masquerading
Hi,
I have a linux box which balances load between two interfaces ( say WAN1
and WAN2). I have masquerading on for any request coming from LAN to the
outside world.
The setup is in such a way that WAN1 drops packets with source ip
belonging to WAN2''s network and viceversa.
For some strange reason, I find that packet coming out from the WAN
interface has source address of WAN2 and
2005 Feb 16
11
Load Balancer setting for Public Servers
Hello,
I have finished setting up the load balancer with IPROUTE ... also patch the
kernel to support DGD and now it''s working fine with the valuable guide at
LARTC website, Julian Anastasov, and the kind people in this mailing list.
Now I would like to launch a web server and a ftp server to the public but
I''m stuck into a problem and really need your help.
Currently internal
2008 Nov 20
0
Disable native bridge?
Background:
WAN1 - Fixed IP low latency, low jitter
WAN2 - Fixed IP medium latency, higher jitter than I like for good VoIP
Firewall/Router not SIP aware
NATed LAN
Asterisk on server located on LAN.
Most, but not all ATA/IP phones on LAN
In the past I was running a v1.2 Asterisk which acted as a B2BUA (all
RTP streams relayed through Asterisk server) thus presenting only one
SIP device to the
2003 Feb 28
6
2 internet ip numbers on eth0
Hi,
I am migrating from one ISP to another, and would like to run both
simultaneously for a while.
So:
(both netmask 255.255.255.248)
[ISP1] 24.106.62.180 [ISP2] 209.181.237.230
| |
| |
\ /
-----[ HUB ]-----
|
|
-------- eth0 ---------
| Linux FW/Server |
---------eth1 ---------
|
|
[ HUB ]
|
10.0.0.x/255.255.255.0
The default IP on