similar to: Top level \Sexpr and R CMD check

On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 12:23 PM Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 12/07/2018 6:33 AM, G?bor Cs?rdi wrote: > > I would like to create \examples{} in the manual dynamically, and > > while it is possible to do this with a \Sexpr at the top level, R CMD > > check issues a warning for it. (See below.) > > > > Is it intentional that

On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 2:21 PM Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote: > I think I found the bug. The tools::checkRd function only processes > \Sexpr's with "stage=render". I think the author (who might have been > me, I forget) assumed that would imply all the earlier stages as well, > but apparently it doesn't. > > So you could use that as

On 12/07/2018 9:46 AM, G?bor Cs?rdi wrote: > On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 2:30 PM G?bor Cs?rdi <csardi.gabor at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 2:21 PM Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote: >>> I think I found the bug. The tools::checkRd function only processes >>> \Sexpr's with "stage=render". I think the author

Hi all, I am trying to use \Sexpr{} within \examples{} in the manual, and it all works fine, except that I get an error and then a NOTE from R CMD check when it checks for long lines in the manual. The long line check calls `Rd2txt` with fragment = TRUE, because it only checks the \usage{} and \examples{} sections, but fragment = TRUE does not evaluate \Sexpr{}, and then an unevaluated \Sexpr{}

On 12/07/2018 7:30 AM, G?bor Cs?rdi wrote: > On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 12:23 PM Duncan Murdoch > <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On 12/07/2018 6:33 AM, G?bor Cs?rdi wrote: >>> I would like to create \examples{} in the manual dynamically, and >>> while it is possible to do this with a \Sexpr at the top level, R CMD >>> check issues a

Hello, Here's an example that renders correctly using Rd2txt / Rd2latex / R CMD Rd2pdf, but has problems under Rd2HTML: \name{foo} \title{foo} \section{foo}{ This should be on a separate paragraph This should be on a separate paragraph This should be on a separate paragraph \Sexpr[stage=render,results=rd]{ paste( rep('Sexpr: This should be on a separate

On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 2:30 PM G?bor Cs?rdi <csardi.gabor at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 2:21 PM Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote: > > I think I found the bug. The tools::checkRd function only processes > > \Sexpr's with "stage=render". I think the author (who might have been > > me, I forget) assumed that

Hi, I'm trying to R CMD check a package, however I have hit a snag. There seems to be a problem with the creation of the /html files (the only file that's constructed here is the 00Index.html). I've tested each of the .Rd files independently with R CMD Rdconv, they all happily create html files without complaint. R CMD check <package> gives the no warnings. I'm therefore

# HG changeset patch # User Jim Fehlig <jfehlig@suse.com> # Date 1360861948 -3600 # Node ID 0f9c7503650fa1b1103b769e1129d66ff614b2ad # Parent cffb489a6df37d8d114e7d2d53a7a85d14e8f968 tools/xend: Only add cpuid and cpuid_check to sexpr once When converting a XendConfig object to sexpr, cpuid and cpuid_check were being emitted twice in the resulting sexpr. The first conversion writes

Dear List, First off, my deepest gratitude to the Sweave developers: this tool has improved my quality greatly. A question in my work I use \Sexpr{} statements scalar values and the xtable package for all manner of tables. What I'd like to do is to use a vector inline, rather than a whole separate table. Something like: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% begin code % Latex junk % Sweave block:

Hi all, On FC5, using: Version 2.3.1 Patched (2006-08-06 r38829) and today's R version 2.4.0 alpha (2006-09-19 r39397) with the following .Rnw file: \documentclass[10pt]{article} \begin{document} This line should print '2': \Sexpr{1 + 1} %% This line should NOT print '2': \Sexpr{1 + 1} \end{document} The \Sexpr in the second line is processed even though the

Hi all, On FC5, using: Version 2.3.1 Patched (2006-08-06 r38829) and today's R version 2.4.0 alpha (2006-09-19 r39397) with the following .Rnw file: \documentclass[10pt]{article} \begin{document} This line should print '2': \Sexpr{1 + 1} %% This line should NOT print '2': \Sexpr{1 + 1} \end{document} The \Sexpr in the second line is processed even though the

Hi all, Currently Sweave does not format the (especially numeric) value in \Sexpr{}, and I often have to round() the numbers explicitly, otherwise I will get more than 10 digits, which is not necessary for me in most cases. Is there a way to specify the number of digits to be kept for values in \Sexpr{}? e.g. can we make \Sexpr{} respect getOption('digits')? Thanks! Regards, Yihui --

Hi: I am trying to create a dynamic latex table using \Sexpr{} but it's not evaluating it. I also tried the example below without Sweave and also fails. I have also copied the Sweave.sty to my working directory but nothing seems to work. Do I need to have certain package in order to run \Sexpr{}? \documentclass[a4paper]{article} \usepackage{C:/R/R-2.8.1/share/texmf/Sweave} \begin{document}

Hi, Is it possible in Sweave to put \Sexpr{} inside <<>>? This is a bad example, but here goes: <<results=hide>> Age <- 5 @ <<>> x <- \Sexpr{Age} @ I'm trying to get it to display x <- 5, rather than x <- Age. It's probably so obvious I'm going to feel sorry for having to ask, just the same, I'm stumped. Any ideas? Thanks. --

Hi, I want 3 digits printed even if the last one is zero with \Sexpr{} For example: > ghg.06[12] [1] 0.2501008 I want: 0.250 What I've tried: \Sexpr{round(ghg.06[12],3)} 0.25 \Sexpr{format(ghg.06[12])} % set options(digits=3) in earlier rnw chunk 0.25 \Sexpr{round(ghg.06[12],4} %but I want 3 not 4 digits 0.2501 Thanks in advance. Elizabeth Stanny epstanny at gmail.com

Marc, >I have a large .Rnw file and was in the process of doing some debugging. >I had set some R chunks to 'eval=false' in the process. This resulted in >some R objects not being created that were in turn used in the >subsequent \Sexpr's. I have often the same problem, I'm using a construct like : <<eval=F>>= x <- rnorm(100) @ I have

Hi, has anybody encountered and solved the following problem? I continued work now on a different computer where I have also used Sweave successfully before. I can run Sweave() and it generates a .tex file. All code chunks are processed and translated to Latex perfectly fine but somehow only the \Sexpr{} tags are not parsed. This is an example .Rnw: \documentclass{article} \usepackage{Sweave}

Hi: Since I work with a few different fish runs my column headers change everytime I start a new Year. I have?been using \Sexpr{} for my?row and columns and now I am trying to use with my?report column headers.?\Sexpr{1,1} is?row 1 column 1, what can I use for headers? I tried \Sexpr{0,1} but sweave didn't like it..Thanks in advance for any hints ? Felipe D. Carrillo Supervisory Fishery

Hi, another Rd related issue I encountered is that if an error occurs in an \Sexpr in an Rd file, then on get the following error: * checking for portable compilation flags in Makevars ... OK * checking for portable use of $(BLAS_LIBS) and $(LAPACK_LIBS) ... OK * checking examples ... ERROR Error in paste(before, x, after, sep = "") : object 'exfile' not found Execution halted