similar to: Testing for vectors

On Sat, Jul 7, 2018 at 12:54 PM, Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote: > On 07/07/2018 1:20 PM, Hadley Wickham wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> Is there are base function that I've missed that tests if an object is >> a vector in the dimensionality sense, rather than the data structure >> sense? i.e. something that checks is.null(dim(x)) ?

On Sat, Jul 7, 2018 at 1:50 PM, Gabe Becker <becker.gabe at gene.com> wrote: > Hadley, > >> >> I was thinking primarily of completing the set of is.matrix() and >> is.array(), or generally, how do you say: is `x` a 1d dimensional >> thing? > > > Can you clarify what you mean by dimensionality sense and specifically 1d > here? What do we call a

Just noticed these two functions (clearNames is stats and unname in base) that do the same thing. Hadley -- http://had.co.nz/

Hi all, Is there a better to way to subset the ROWs (in the sense of NROW) of an vector, matrix, data frame or array than this? subset_ROW <- function(x, i) { nd <- length(dim(x)) if (nd <= 1L) { x[i] } else { dims <- rep(list(quote(expr = )), nd - 1L) do.call(`[`, c(list(quote(x), quote(i)), dims, list(drop = FALSE))) } } subset_ROW(1:10, 4:6) #> [1] 4 5 6

I suspect this will have suboptimal performance since the TRUEs will get recycled. (Maybe there is, or could be, ALTREP, support for recycling) Hadley On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 10:16 AM, Berry, Charles <ccberry at ucsd.edu> wrote: > > >> On Jun 8, 2018, at 8:45 AM, Hadley Wickham <h.wickham at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> Is there a better to

I know I said that I had no further comments on object oriented semantics. However, I found a contradiction in the R documentation. Gabriel Becker wrote: > So, there are implicit classes, but *only when the data object is NOT an "R object" In the R Language Definition: > The R specific function typeof returns the type of an R object. > Lists have elements, each of which can

Hi all, Would someone mind pointing to me to the inspiration for the use of the L suffix to mean "integer"? This is obviously hard to google for, and the R language definition (https://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-release/R-lang.html#Constants) is silent. Hadley -- http://hadley.nz

But you can easily fall back to R from within Julia; see http://juliastats.github.io/RCall.jl/latest/ On Aug 5, 2016 1:27 PM, "Hadley Wickham" <h.wickham at gmail.com> wrote: > No. > > Hadley > > On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Kenny Bell <kmbell56 at gmail.com> wrote: > > Is it conceivable that Julia could be ported to use R syntax in a way > that

Is it conceivable that Julia could be ported to use R syntax in a way that would allow the vastly larger numbers of R programmers to seamlessly switch? Or equivalently, could an iteration of R itself do this? On Fri, Aug 5, 2016, 9:00 AM Hadley Wickham <h.wickham at gmail.com> wrote: > When it was being actively worked on, it had the advantage of existing. > > Hadley > > On

Hi all, all.equal is generally very useful when you want to find the differences between two objects. It breaks down however, when you have two long strings to compare: > all.equal(a, b) [1] "1 string mismatch" Does any one know of any good text diffing tools implemented in R? Thanks, Hadley -- Assistant Professor / Dobelman Family Junior Chair Department of Statistics / Rice

This is admittedly minor, and you shouldn't have repeated names in a data frame anyway, but: df <- data.frame(1:3, 1:3, 1:3) # Ok setNames(df, c("x", "y", "")) # Not ok setNames(df, c("x", "", "")) Hadley -- http://hadley.nz

On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Hadley Wickham <h.wickham at gmail.com> wrote: > Seems easy enough to write yourself: > > where <- function(x, env = parent.frame()) { > if (identical(env, emptyenv())) > return(NULL) > if (exists(x, envir = env, inherits = FALSE)) > return(env) > where(x, parent.env(env)) > } > > sample2 <-

> On Jun 8, 2018, at 11:52 AM, Hadley Wickham <h.wickham at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 11:38 AM, Berry, Charles <ccberry at ucsd.edu> wrote: >> >> >>> On Jun 8, 2018, at 10:37 AM, Herv? Pag?s <hpages at fredhutch.org> wrote: >>> >>> Also the TRUEs cause problems if some dimensions are 0: >>>

I left out the warning - it's still there. The output object is malformed but either +.factor should prevent this or match() should check. Hadley On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 3:50 PM, William Dunlap <wdunlap at tibco.com> wrote: > Did you leave out the warning from "+", which should be an error, > as it produces an illegal ordered factor in this case and factor+factor >

On 12/06/2015 10:53 AM, Hadley Wickham wrote: > To me, it seems like there's actually two problems here: > > 1) Preventing all() from dispatching to all.effects() for objects of > class effects > 2) Eliminating the NOTE in R CMD check > > My impression is that 1) actually causes few problems, particularly > since people are mostly now aware of the problem and avoid

Same thing happens with S3 if you redefine print(). I thought that code was actually calculating the function to call rather than the symbol to use, but apparently not. Shouldn't be too hard to fix. luke On Tue, 30 Jun 2015, Hadley Wickham wrote: > On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Duncan Murdoch > <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote: >> On 30/06/2015 1:57 PM, Hadley

What do you prefer/recommend for double-banger function names: 1 scale.colour 2 scale_colour 3 scaleColour 1 is more R-like, but conflicts with S3. 2 is a modern version of number 1, but not many packages use it. Number 3 is more java-like. (I like number 2 best) Any suggestions? Thanks, Hadley

On 30/06/2015 1:57 PM, Hadley Wickham wrote: > A slightly simpler formulation of the problem is: > > show <- function(...) stop("My show!") > methods::setClass("Person", slots = list(name = "character")) > methods::new("Person", name = "Tom") > #> Error in (function (...) : My show! Just to be clear: the complaint is

> On Jun 8, 2018, at 10:37 AM, Herv? Pag?s <hpages at fredhutch.org> wrote: > > Also the TRUEs cause problems if some dimensions are 0: > > > matrix(raw(0), nrow=5, ncol=0)[1:3 , TRUE] > Error in matrix(raw(0), nrow = 5, ncol = 0)[1:3, TRUE] : > (subscript) logical subscript too long OK. But this is easy enough to handle. > > H. > > On

On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 9:50 AM, Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote: > On 03/05/2018 11:18 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote: >> >> On 03/05/2018 11:01 AM, William Dunlap via R-devel wrote: >>> >>> In R-3.5.0 you can use ...length(): >>> > f <- function(..., n) ...length() >>> > f(stop("one"),