similar to: Dispatch mechanism seems to alter object before calling method on it

On 05/15/2018 09:13 PM, Michael Lawrence wrote: > My understanding is that array (or any other structure) does not > "simply" inherit from vector, because structures are not vectors in > the strictest sense. Basically, once a vector gains attributes, it is > a structure, not a vector. The methods package accommodates this by > defining an "is" relationship

On 05/16/2018 10:22 AM, Michael Lawrence wrote: > Factors and data.frames are not structures, because they must have a > class attribute. Just call them "objects". They are higher level than > structures, which in practice just shape data without adding a lot of > semantics. Compare getClass("matrix") and getClass("factor"). > > I agree that

On 05/16/2018 01:24 PM, Michael Lawrence wrote: > On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 12:23 PM, Herv? Pag?s <hpages at fredhutch.org> wrote: >> On 05/16/2018 10:22 AM, Michael Lawrence wrote: >>> >>> Factors and data.frames are not structures, because they must have a >>> class attribute. Just call them "objects". They are higher level than >>>

Here is an example: setGeneric("foo", function(x, y) standardGeneric("foo")) setMethod("foo", c("numeric", "ANY"), function(x, y) cat("I'm the foo#numeric#ANY method\n") ) Dispatch works as expected but selectMethod() fails to find the method: > foo(1, TRUE) I'm the foo#numeric#ANY method >

Hi Michael, Thanks for looking into this. I suspect that truncation of ANY suffixes from method signatures is also the culprit behind the sudden breakage of aliases of the form \alias{foo,numeric-method} when a method without the ANY suffix in its signature gets added to the ecosystem. See my post about this to the Bioc-devel mailing list a couple of months ago:

Fine with me as long as eliminating the inconveniences associated with it can be put on the roadmap. The alias instability and the fact that the user has no way to know if s/he should do ?`foo,numeric-method` or ?`foo,numeric,ANY-method` to find the method has been a long-standing problem. H. On 3/21/19 21:29, Michael Lawrence wrote: If we started over, I'd try to avoid this sort of

Factors and data.frames are not structures, because they must have a class attribute. Just call them "objects". They are higher level than structures, which in practice just shape data without adding a lot of semantics. Compare getClass("matrix") and getClass("factor"). I agree that inheritance through explicit coercion is confusing. As far as I know, there are only

On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 12:23 PM, Herv? Pag?s <hpages at fredhutch.org> wrote: > On 05/16/2018 10:22 AM, Michael Lawrence wrote: >> >> Factors and data.frames are not structures, because they must have a >> class attribute. Just call them "objects". They are higher level than >> structures, which in practice just shape data without adding a lot of

On 03/19/2016 01:22 AM, Michael Lawrence wrote: > > > On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 12:10 AM, Herv? Pag?s <hpages at fredhutch.org > <mailto:hpages at fredhutch.org>> wrote: > > On 03/18/2016 03:28 PM, Michael Lawrence wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Herv? Pag?s > <hpages at fredhutch.org <mailto:hpages at

On 03/18/2016 03:28 PM, Michael Lawrence wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Herv? Pag?s <hpages at fredhutch.org > <mailto:hpages at fredhutch.org>> wrote: > > Hi, > > Short story > ----------- > > setClassUnion("ArrayLike", "array") > > showClass("ArrayLike") # no slot > >

My understanding is that array (or any other structure) does not "simply" inherit from vector, because structures are not vectors in the strictest sense. Basically, once a vector gains attributes, it is a structure, not a vector. The methods package accommodates this by defining an "is" relationship between "structure" and "vector" via an "explicit

Hi, Short story ----------- setClassUnion("ArrayLike", "array") showClass("ArrayLike") # no slot setClass("MyArrayLikeConcreteSubclass", contains="ArrayLike", representation(stuff="ANY") ) showClass("MyArrayLikeConcreteSubclass") # 2 slots!! That doesn't seem right. Long story ----------

Hi Mehmet, On 11/29/2017 11:22 AM, Suzen, Mehmet wrote: > Hi Herve, > > I think you are confusing subclasses and classes. There is no > contradiction. `is` documentation > is very clear: > > `With one argument, returns all the super-classes of this object's class.` Yes that's indeed very clear. So if "list" is a super-class of "data.frame" (as

Hi, Currently object.size() is not very useful on environments as it always returns 56 bytes, no matter how big the environment is: env1 <- new.env() object.size(env1) # 56 bytes env2 <- new.env(hash=TRUE, size=75000000L) object.size(env2) # 56 bytes env3 <- list2env(list(a=runif(25000000), L=LETTERS)) object.size(env3) # 56 bytes This makes it pretty useless on

by() does not always return a list. In Gabe's example, it returns an integer, thus it is coerced to a list. as.list() means that it should be a VECSXP, not necessarily with "list" in the class attribute. Michael On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 2:41 PM, Herv? Pag?s <hpages at fredhutch.org> wrote: > Hi Gabe, > > Interestingly the behavior of as.list() on by objects seem to

Not sure why the performance penalty of nonstandard evaluation would be more of a concern here than for something like switch(). If that can't/won't be fixed, what about fixing the man page so it's in sync with the current behavior? Thanks, H. On 05/03/2017 02:26 AM, peter dalgaard wrote: > The first line of stopifnot is > > n <- length(ll <- list(...)) > >

I agree with Herve, processing collapse happens last so collapse=non-NULL always leads to a single character string being returned, the same as paste(collapse=""). See the altPaste function I posted yesterday. Bill Dunlap TIBCO Software wdunlap tibco.com On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 9:12 AM Herv? Pag?s <hpages at fredhutch.org> wrote: > I think that > >

On 3/27/20 15:19, Hadley Wickham wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 4:01 PM Herv? Pag?s <hpages at fredhutch.org > <mailto:hpages at fredhutch.org>> wrote: > > > > On 3/27/20 12:00, Hadley Wickham wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 10:39 AM Herv? Pag?s > <hpages at fredhutch.org <mailto:hpages at

On 3/27/20 12:00, Hadley Wickham wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 10:39 AM Herv? Pag?s <hpages at fredhutch.org > <mailto:hpages at fredhutch.org>> wrote: > > Hi Tomas, > > On 3/27/20 07:01, Tomas Kalibera wrote: > > they provide an over-approximation > > They can also provide an "under-approximation" (to say the

Hi, The unary forms of is() and extends() report that data.frame extends list, oldClass, and vector: > is(data.frame()) [1] "data.frame" "list" "oldClass" "vector" > extends("data.frame") [1] "data.frame" "list" "oldClass" "vector" However, the binary form of is()