similar to: User sets or anything similar?

Hello all I wanted to forward all incoming requests in port 80 to a server in my LAN, and by using DNAT lines, it actually works. However, it is unstable, in the sense that in the beggining of each connection (one or two seconds) it is extremely fast, then it sometimes pauses and waits 30 seconds or so, then it starts again and so on. The line i used is : DNAT net loc:192.168.0.210 tcp 80 DNAT

1 small question i have 4 network cards on my firewall eth0 inet eth1 internel network eth2 customer network eth3 freeswan vpn is there a way that i can connect the eth2 and eth1 network together so that i can access the servers off eth1 from eth2? Marshal McInnis Tech / Web Designs 1-205-344-4455 Ext 208

Hi, I''ve installed Emule (p2p program) on my client box but I can''t access the servers due to the firewall. I''m getting this blocking errors: Jan 22 01:26:07 servidor kernel: Shorewall:net2all:DROP:IN=eth1 OUT=eth0 SRC=213.22.49.86 DST=192.168.0.3 LEN=60 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=57 ID=50538 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=46408 DPT=4662 WINDOW=5840 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0 My rules file

I just setup the Shorewall in my school, but now all clients can''t through to internet, all servers can through to internet with NAT, when I disabled NAT that all servers can''t through to internet. Below is my school network: internet ---> shorewall ----> loc ---> ciso router ---> loc1 Below is my config files: policy: # If you want to force clients to

Hi, i have a huge problem ;] I have redirected port 69 from NET (internet) IP 212.122.68.129 to the local network (masq) 192.168.0.3, that all queries from internet goes to local network PC. ACCEPT net masq tcp 69 - DNAT net masq:192.168.0.3 tcp 69 - everything works fine from the internet, but now I cannot access this port from other local PC`s. i have to access it locally, when i

Hi there, I''ve read Routing on One Interface, and Shorewall and Aliased Interfaces docs but I''m a little confused, and all my test attempts have mostly failed. Here is my setup: CentOS 4.2 ShoreWall 3.0.2 My server has a subnet 192.168.50.0/29 routed to it via 192.168.1.2. Currently 192.168.1.2 is setup on eth0. With no ShoreWall involved routing seems to work if I just setup

Hi, I am using Shorewall in Adamantix. At the moment everything flow fine, my question is that how can I filter the access by computer mac address, I had read the documentation maybe I am ''stupid enough to spot the guide, if so please show me''. What is the rules line if I want to 1. limit ~01-01-01-01-01-01,~02-02-02-02-02-02,~03-03-03-03-03-03-03 to access 202.202.202.202

hi, Please see the following text diagram: 10.0.15.0/24 --> 10.0.15.1 (f0/1) cisco router (f0/0) 192.168.0.5 <-- 192.168.0.0/24 --> 192.168.0.1 firewall --> internet I have some problem after added a static route in shorewall in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/route-eth0, the syntax is: 10.0.15.0/24 via 192.168.0.5 in 192.168.0.0/24 computers cannot ping or

Hello, I''m not sure if this has been asked before but I would like to ask assistance for this problem I have. I installed gentoo for my firewall/gateway and installed dhcp and shorewall. Currently, I can ssh, ftp, remote desktop connect, ping, etc (anything I can think of) from an internal computer inside my network to an external IP, except I cannot surf the net. I can ssh/ftp to

Tom, I am NOT subscribed (yet). I dropped SuSeFirewall2 in favor of shorewall to get past the configuration hurdles I as experiencing. At the moment, when my SuSe 9.1 starts up, I can see shorewall processing the rules, policies, etc. and I see no errors and then moves on with the rest of the SuSe boot process . However, no traffic passes through using the rules. I run an iptables -L and I

Hello - I am not a subscriber to the mailing, please email me with help at mfabache@yahoo.com My shorewall (v2.0.1) has been working wonderful for the past year. I just added my Vonage and cannot get the Phone Adapter to sync up (2 blinks (looking for IP)) All I have done is run an ethernet cable from the WAN outlet on the phone adapter to a lan port on the router. After googling, I found

Good day to all. I don''t like to Post unless I am really stuck. Guess what? Redhat with Shorewall. Been using this for years. I have a new client that we have setup with Redhat and Shorewall. The problem is that his outside address (ETH0 = NET) is dynamic (i.e. DHCP enabled). All the rules work fine when we use a STATIC address on Eth0, so we know the rules, filters, tos etc work fine

We are using Shorewall 2.0.8 with SuSE 9.1 and have built a bridging firewall primarily to defend against syn flood and smurf DoS attacks. We are a small ISP using Cisco routers for a total of 5-6 subnets. Since bridges are based on use of MAC addresses, if we could use one bridging firewall system instead of 5-6 ... is this possible? practical? (Other than introducing a single point of failure

Hello, First let me say how much I appreciate Shorewall. I just downloaded shorewall-1.3.14.tgz, built and installed it without error, and had it working with only minimal fiddling with the config files. I''m having trouble getting NFS to work with Shorewall. I followed the info on the "Ports required for Various Services/ Applications" page but I couldn''t get it to

Hello, on my old system I''m using ipchains. Can anyone help me with converting rule /sbin/ipchains -A forward -j MASQ -s source_addr -d destination_addr 443 -p tcp to shorewall. I know that I can write eth0 source_addr to /etc/shorewall/masq file but I can''t found where I can specify the destination address. The reason for this is to allow one user (computer) access only to

I am attempting to forward http requests to my external interface, from internal machines to a machine that is located on the internal interface, via the firewall rules. Externally, I am able to forward the port to the webserver located behind the firewall, and I want to use the same hostname/ip for clients if they are on both sides of the firewall. Note, that I only want to do just the one port,

I am missing a tiny detail on understanding a simple port forward: I want to forward just like the FAQ listed, via #ACTION SOURCE DEST PROTO DEST PORT DNAT net loc:192.168.1.3:22 tcp 1022 Which works just fine. Now I also tried this following type of rule, which I thought would work, but it did not. #ACTION SOURCE DEST PROTO DEST-PORT

Hi, I''m trying to get RAdmin [uses tcp 4889] access to my Windows machine which is behind my firewall. I have zones: gbl : the world loc : my lan fw : firewall I placed the following in my rules file DNAT gbl loc:192.168.0.2 tcp 4889 - When trying to RAdmin I get a cannot conect to server error. 192.168.0.2 is my Windows Machines IP address. Can anyone help me? Shorewall 1.3.9b

Hello List, I tried to set up openvpn with the shorewall on my openwrt box but failed! I am not able to access the "loc"al Network from my vpn. I followed the roadwarrior setup. I define a vpn zone, that should be able to access the firewall and the local network: vpn fw ACCEPT info fw loc ACCEPT info vpn

-- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net PGP Public Key \ https://lists.shorewall.net/teastep.pgp.key