similar to: How to address the following: CRAN packages not using Suggests conditionally

On 01/22/2018 08:40 AM, Ulrich Bodenhofer wrote: > Thanks a lot, I?aki, this is a perfect solution! I already implemented > it and it works great. I'll wait for 2 more days before I submit the > revised package to CRAN - in order to give others to comment on it. It's very easy for 'pictures of code' (unevaluated code chunks in vignettes) to drift from the actual

Thanks a lot, I?aki, this is a perfect solution! I already implemented it and it works great. I'll wait for 2 more days before I submit the revised package to CRAN - in order to give others to comment on it. Best regards, Ulrich On 01/22/2018 10:16 AM, I?aki ?car wrote: > Re-sending, since I forgot to include the list, sorry. I'm including > r-package-devel too this time, as it

Dear colleagues, dear members of the R Core Team, This was an issue raised by Prof. Brian Ripley and sent privately to all developers of CRAN packages that suggest Bioconductor packages (see original message below). As mentioned in my message enclosed below, it was easy for me to fix the error in examples (new version not submitted to CRAN yet), but it might turn into a major effort for the

[cross-posted to R-devel and bioc-devel] Hi, I am trying to implement a 'sort' method in one of the CRAN packages I am maintaining ('apcluster'). I started with using setMethod("sort", ...) in my package, which worked fine. Since many users of my package are from the bioinformatics field, I want to ensure that my package works smoothly with Bioconductor. The problem

That might be worth thinking about generally, but it would still be nice to have the base generics pre-defined, so that people are not copy and pasting the definitions everywhere, hoping that they stay consistent. On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 6:13 AM, Gabriel Becker <gmbecker@ucdavis.edu>wrote: > Perhaps a patch to R such that generics don't clobber each-other's method > tables

On 03/27/2014 02:13 AM, Ulrich Bodenhofer wrote: > I fully agree, Michael, that this would be a great thing to have! I have > often wondered why R and the standard packages are still sticking so > much to the old-style S3 flavor though S4 is part of standard R. I > acknowledge that backward compatibility is important, but, as far as I > got it, redefining a function or S3 generic as

Hi, I just figured out that I accidentally posted my message in HTML, so I am retrying in plain text only. Sorry. I am currently extending one of our CRAN packages and ran into an unexpected problem when checking the source package. I got some warnings in the step "* checking for code/documentation mismatches". I double checked everything and did not see anything that would

I fully agree, Michael, that this would be a great thing to have! I have often wondered why R and the standard packages are still sticking so much to the old-style S3 flavor though S4 is part of standard R. I acknowledge that backward compatibility is important, but, as far as I got it, redefining a function or S3 generic as an S4 generic should not harm existing functionality (if done

Dear colleagues, This is to inform you that Version 1.3.0 of the R package apcluster has been released on CRAN yesterday. We did a major extension and overhaul of the package. Most importantly, we added Leveraged Affinity Propagation in fulfillment of multiple users requests. It should now be much easier to cluster large data sets. Apart from this extension, the interfaces to apcluster() and

Dear colleagues, This is to inform you that I will be giving a webinar on the apcluster package on Thursday, June 13, 2013, 7:00pm CEST (10:00am PDT). The outline of the one-hour webinar is as follows: - Introduction to affinity propagation (AP) clustering - The apcluster package, its algorithms, and visualization tools - Live apcluster demonstration - Question and Answer period To register

Dear colleagues, This is to inform you that Version 1.3.1 of the R package apcluster has been released on CRAN. We did a major improvement of heatmap and dendrogram plotting, as well as several minor improvements of the package. For more details, see the following URLs: http://www.bioinf.jku.at/software/apcluster/ http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/apcluster/index.html Best regards,

Hi, I am using R on Ubuntu 12.10 (64bit). This morning, Ubuntu's software updater automatically installed updates to R's base system (version 2.15.3; via the CRAN PPA). Now R does not work anymore. Here is what I get when I simply enter "R" on the shell prompt: bodenhof FUKUOKA~>R cannot find system Renviron Error : .onLoad failed in loadNamespace() for 'utils',

Hi All, Here is the case. I want to build classification model (SVM). Some of variables for this model are categorical attributes which represent words (usually 3-10 words - query for search in google). For example: search_id | query_words |..| result -----------+----------------------------------+--+-------- 1 | how,to,grow,tree |..| 4 2

Hi all, Not sure if this belongs to R-devel or R-package-devel. Anyways... Suppose we have objects of class c("foo", "bar"), and there are two S3 methods c.foo, c.bar. In c.foo, I'm trying to modify the dots and forward the dispatch using NextMethod without any success. This is what I've tried so far: c.foo <- function(..., recursive=FALSE) { dots <-

Hi, I am currently extending one of our CRAN packages and ran into an unexpected problem when checking the source package. I got some warnings in the step "* checking for code/documentation mismatches". I double checked everything and did not see anything that would actually justify this warning. After testing around for quite a while, I think I can now pinpoint the problem. In

The example is invoking NextMethod via an anonymous function, which is not allowed (see documentation for NextMethod). Normally one gets a runtime error "'NextMethod' called from an anonymous function", but not here as the anonymous function is called via do.call. I will fix so that there is a runtime error in this case as well, thanks for uncovering this problem. I

On 03/27/2014 06:31 PM, Herv? Pag?s wrote: > On 03/27/2014 02:13 AM, Ulrich Bodenhofer wrote: >> [...] >> >> For the time being, it seems I have three options: >> >> 1) not supplying the sort() function yet (it is not yet in the release, >> but only in my internal devel version) >> 2) including a dependency to BiocGenerics >> 3) leaving the

Hello, I have a dataset with proportions that vary around a fixed mean, is it possible to use betareg to look at variance in the dispersion parameter while keeping the mean fixed? I am very new to R but have tried the following: svec<-c(qlogis(mean(data1$scaled)),0,0,0) f<-betareg(scaled~-1 | expt_label + grouped_hpi, data=data1, link.phi="log",

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ CALL FOR PAPERS 15th International Conference on Managed Languages & Runtimes (ManLang'18) September 10-14, 2018, Linz, Austria http://ssw.jku.at/manlang18/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ManLang (formerly PPPJ) is a

I'm in the process of converting some S3 methods to S4 methods. I have this function : setGeneric("enrichmentCalc", function(rs, organism, seqLen, ...){standardGeneric("enrichmentCalc")}) setMethod("enrichmentCalc", c("GenomeDataList", "BSgenome"), function(rs, organism, seqLen, ...) { ... ... ... })