similar to: formatting raw vectors with names

R gurus, Every so often(*) someone asks how to suppress scientific notation in printing, so I thought I'd give it a shot, but I need some help. The formatting decision is made(**) on line 286 of src/main/format.c : if (mF <= *m) { /* IFF it needs less space : "F" (Fixpoint) format */ where mF is the number of characters for "normal" printing and *m is the number

The current R release candidate has a lack of protect bug (of very long standing) with respect to the R_print.na_string and R_print.na_string_noquote fields of the static R_print structure declared in Print.h. This shows up very occassionally as incorrect output from the following lines in reg-tests-2.R: x <- c("a", NA, "b") factor(x) factor(x, exclude="")

Hi, I want to print real numbers in C code with different values for digits. How to do that? As I have understood, what I should do is to call StringFromReal() which calls FormatReal(), that one suggests the parameters (width, decimal places and exponential form). FormatReal() includes eps = pow(10.0, -(double)R_print.digits); So I guess I have to change the value of R_print.digits.

While working on the printing code, my colleague Zbyn?k ?lajchrt noticed that complex matrixes are sometimes misaligned: > { matrix(1i,2,13) } [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5] [,6] [,7] [,8] [,9] [,10] [,11] [,12] [,13] [1,] 0+1i 0+1i 0+1i 0+1i 0+1i 0+1i 0+1i 0+1i 0+1i 0+1i 0+1i 0+1i 0+1i [2,] 0+1i 0+1i 0+1i 0+1i 0+1i 0+1i 0+1i 0+1i 0+1i 0+1i 0+1i 0+1i 0+1i (the values in the last four columns

An NA in the rownames of a matrix (or dataframe) causes misalignment when the matrix is printed: R> x <- matrix(1:12, 3,4, dimnames=list(letters[1:3], LETTERS[1:4])) R> rownames(x)[2] <- NA R> x A B C D a 1 4 7 10 <NA> 2 5 8 11 c 3 6 9 12 The bug is in function Rstrlen, in src/main/printutils.c. MatrixRowLabel and MatrixColumnLabel (same file) rely on Rstrlen

On a system with IEEE_754 undefined, I run into an bug, when the value of an element of the first argument (e.g., x[0]) of formatReal() is NA: 1. (format.c:235) if (!R_FINITE ..) gives nanflag=1 (!naflag remains 0) 2. (format.c:272..288) *m gets an value of -2147483643 (from the format fiddling, should not matter to us) 3. (format.c:289) because naflag is zero, m does not

>>>>> Radford Neal <radford at cs.toronto.edu> >>>>> on Sat, 13 Jun 2015 17:24:04 -0400 writes: > The current R release candidate has a lack of protect bug > (of very long standing) [ but not really reported, right ? ] > with respect to the > R_print.na_string and R_print.na_string_noquote fields of > the static

Thank for Brian D. Ripley for the answer to my previous question. My aim is to print single values from different real vectors with different digits option. This is quite a possible with Rprintf() but that one supprots printing format as C does, not in R native way (setting digits=7 or printing with "%12.7f" are two quite different things). So I would like to find something more

For example, strings <- c("aaaa", "bbbb","ccba"). How to get "aaaa", "bbbb" that do not contain "ba" ? _________________________________________________________________ [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Dear friends, How do I stop partial matching of list names? e.g., x <- list(AAAA="aaaaa", BBBBB="bbbbb") is.null(x$A) #returns FALSE even though there is no element A. if(is.null(x$A)) {result <- x$BBBB} else {result <- x$A} result #is aaaa even though there is no x$A element x <- list(CCCC="aaaaa", BBBBB="bbbbb") if(is.null(x$A))

Dear R helpers, Suppose I have following data.frame. df <- data.frame(category = c("treat_A", "treat_A", "treat_A", "treat_A", "treat_A", "treat_A", "treat_A", "treat_A", "treat_B", "treat_B", "treat_B", "treat_B", "treat_B", "treat_B",

I have two factors l1, l2, and I'd like to merge them. (Remark: The factors can not be converted to charaters) Function c() does not give me the result I want: > l1 = factor(c('aaaa', 'bbbb')) > l2 = factor(c('ccc', 'dd')) > lMerge = factor(c(l1, l2)) > lMerge [1] 1 2 1 2 Levels: 1 2 > I'd like to merge l1 and l2 and to get lMerge

OK. "passdb/userdb" Setting part $ dovecot -n (Excerpt from change) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------- passdb { args = scheme=CRYPT username_format=%u /etc/dovecot/users.auth driver = passwd-file } userdb { args = username_format=%u /etc/dovecot/users.auth driver = passwd-file } protocol lmtp { info_log_path =

Hi R users, I am new to R and am trying to merge data frames in the following way. Suppose I have n data frames each with two fields. Field 1 is common among data frames but may have different entries. Field 2 is different. Data frame 1: Src Target1 1 aaa 1 bbb 1 ccc 2 aaa 3 ddd Data frame 2: Src Target2 2 aaaa 3 dddd 4 bbbb 4

I can't get IPv6 routing to configure correctly despite everything I've read saying it should This is my network config on a fully-updated CentOS 5.8 system: # cat /etc/sysconfig/network NETWORKING=yes NETWORKING_IPV6=yes HOSTNAME=my.hostname.com GATEWAY=aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd IPV6_DEFAULTGW=2a02:aaaa.bbbb::1 IPV6_DEFAULTDEV=eth0 # cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0

Hi, When I tested xm new command without uuid parameter repeatedly, I saw many same managed domain as follows. # xm list Name ID Mem VCPUs State Time(s) Domain-0 0 941 2 r----- 51.9 # xm new /xen/vm1.conf Using config file "/xen/vm1.conf". # xm new /xen/vm1.conf Using config file

I've been trying out IPv6 networking with tinc and noticed that it will not route smaller segments than /48 If I try to run ip -6 route add aaaa:bbbb:cccc:dddd::/64 dev tun0 I get network unreachable However if I run ip -6 route add aaaa:bbbb:cccc::/48 dev tun0 it works fine Is this is a limitation in tinc or the kernel network stack itself? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML

I've the following error : Doing a node status request to the domain master browser at IP aaaa.bbbb.cccc.dddd failed First time I configure my smb.conf file on a server with the adress aaaa.bbbb.cccc.dddd For some raison I have to change this address for another. When I restart samba I the message : nmbd/nmbd_browsesync.c:get_domain_master_name_node_status_fail(486)

Gedalya-san Thank you for the information. It seems to be difficult... morikawa -----Original Message----- From: dovecot [mailto:dovecot-bounces at dovecot.org] On Behalf Of Gedalya Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2020 1:17 PM To: dovecot at dovecot.org Subject: Re: dovecot quota-warning detection mail Aha. Then it's not a straightforward case of just adding the domain name to the same

I have 2 nodes nodeA and nodeB I'm using tinc 1.1pre11 -- nodeA(fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1) : $ ip -6 route fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1 dev tun0 proto kernel metric 256 fd80:2015:2105:adcd::/64 dev tun0 metric 1024 fe80::/64 dev eth0 proto kernel metric 256 $ ping6 fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1 PING fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1(fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1) 56 data bytes 64 bytes from fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1: