Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "Are you considering the possibility of partnership?"
2017 Jul 03
0
Are you considering the possibility of partnership?
On 2017-07-03 2:02 PM, Uwe Ligges wrote:
> Plese stop this.
People who reply to spammers only invite more spam. The only way
I know to defeat them is to get software to block them. The anti-spam
software I have is not great but is better than nothing.
Spencer
>
> Best,
> Uwe Ligges
>
>
>
> On 03.07.2017 11:29, Keira Cohen wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
2007 Aug 01
1
Partnership with CentOS for commercial support
Hello,
My name is Jeongkyu Kim and I am working for Korea Linux Center, mid-size
Korean company specialized in developing Linux server & desktop
distributions from 2002. Our main focus of sales is public sector such as
government agencies and public schools.
Recently, we made a decision that further development of our server
distribution will be based on CentOS. We believe that it would
2019 Dec 13
2
Dovecot 2.3.9 - lmtp crashes with Signal 11
Hallo Aki,
the affected code location seems to be concerned with parsing to ?To:? header. I checked all the mails causing the crash, the To: header is either empty (but present) or contains ?undisclosed-recipients:;?.
I checked this manually and sure enough lmtp crashes:
nc -C -U dovecot-lmtp
220 keira.mike2k.de Dovecot
2019 Dec 13
2
Dovecot 2.3.9 - lmtp crashes with Signal 11
Hi Aki,
first thanks for the quick fix.
Unfortunately, it only resolves the issue partially. For the ?To: undisclosed-recipients:;?, it works now. For ?To: ? it still crashes (i. e. what I did with my manual lmtp dialog).
Michael
> On 13. Dec 2019, at 11:54, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at open-xchange.com> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> We have released v2.3.9.1 fixing this issue.
>
2005 Jun 13
1
Cepstral partnership with Digium
I just read about the partnership but was wondering what is actually going
to happen? Is asterisk going to be bundled with cepstral voices for free :)?
Or whats the deal?
2019 Dec 13
1
Dovecot 2.3.9 - lmtp crashes with Signal 11
Can you provide p *addr?
Aki
On 13.12.2019 13.15, Michael Stilkerich wrote:
> HI,
>
> and the backtrace (essentially same as before except for the line numbers moved by the code changes):
>
> Core was generated by `dovecot/lmtp'. [50/749]
> Program terminated
2016 Apr 02
0
p values from GLM
On 4/2/2016 11:07 AM, David Winsemius wrote:
>> On Apr 1, 2016, at 5:01 PM, Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 01/04/2016 6:46 PM, Bert Gunter wrote:
>>> ... of course, whether one **should** get them is questionable...
>> They're just statistics. How could it hurt to look at them?
> Like Rolf, I thought that this utterance
2008 Jan 23
2
Parametric survival models with left truncated, right censored data
Dear All,
I would like to fit some parametric survival models using left
truncated, right censored data in R. However I am having problems
finding a function to fit parametric survival models which can handle
left truncated data.
I have tested both the survreg function in package survival:
fit1 <- survreg(Surv(start, stop, status) ~ X + Y + Z, data=data1)
and the psm function in package
2005 May 13
4
Gigabit Throughput too low
Hi I was wondering if you ever got better performance out of your
Gigabit/IDE/Fc2?
I am facing a similar situation. I am running FC2 with Samba 3.x
My problem lies in not that I am limited to 10 MBytes per second
sustained. I think it's related to this pdflush and how it's buffers
are setup. (I have been doing some research and before 2.6 kernels
bdflush was the method that was used and
2019 Dec 13
0
Dovecot 2.3.9 - lmtp crashes with Signal 11
Hi!
We have released v2.3.9.1 fixing this issue.
Thank you for your effort!
Aki
On 13.12.2019 12.27, Michael Stilkerich wrote:
> Hallo Aki,
>
> the affected code location seems to be concerned with parsing to ?To:? header. I checked all the mails causing the crash, the To: header is either empty (but present) or contains ?undisclosed-recipients:;?.
>
> I checked this manually
2012 Oct 08
6
How to use Lines function to draw the error bars?
fit lwr upr
1 218.4332 90.51019 346.3561
2 218.3906 90.46133 346.3198
3 218.3906 90.46133 346.3198
4 161.3982 44.85702 277.9394
5 192.4450 68.39903 316.4909
6 179.8056 56.49540 303.1158
7 219.5406 91.52707 347.5542
8 162.6761 46.65760 278.6945
9 193.8506 70.59838 317.1029
10 181.3816 58.11305 304.6502
11 221.2871 92.14366 350.4305
12 164.2947 47.91081 280.6785
13
2005 Apr 22
1
speex question
can somebody point me in the direction of some sample c/c++ code for encoding stereo product esp wideband mode
thanks in anticipation
Andy Basford
The information contained in this message (and any attachments) may
be confidential and is intended for the sole use of the named addressee.
Access, copying, alteration or re-use of the e-mail by anyone other
than the intended recipient is
2007 May 15
1
development plan for vorbis encoder
Hello everybody
I'm very new in vorbis project and I would like to know if there's any
development plan for this project. I'm particularly interested in a fixed
point implementation of vorbis encoder.
I would like to work on this branch of the project but I will need support
in order to get this branch done. If everyone is interested in a partnership
for this project please let me know
2008 Feb 11
1
tree() producing NA's
Hi
Hoping someone can help me (a newbie).
I am trying to construct a tree using tree() in package tree. One of the
fields is a factor field (owner), with many levels. In the resulting tree, I
see many NA's (see below), yet in the actual data there are none.
> rr200.tr <- tree(backprof ~ ., rr200)
> rr200.tr
1) root 200 1826.00 -0.2332
...
[snip]
...
5) owner:
2012 Oct 03
1
stepAIC in R
My stepAIC function works for one set of data but not another....one set
of data shows the steps of eliminating variables, versus another set of
data doesn't throw away any variables.
Can anyone please explain why? Thanks
______________________________________________________________________
The information transmitted, including any attachments, is intended only for the person or entity
2012 Oct 03
1
will 9 data points work for a regression in R?
See error message below: can someone please help with this? Thanks!
Residuals:
ALL 9 residuals are 0: no residual degrees of freedom!
Residual standard error: NaN on 0 degrees of freedom
Multiple R-squared: 1, Adjusted R-squared: NaN
F-statistic: NaN on 8 and 0 DF, p-value: NA
______________________________________________________________________
The information transmitted,
2019 Dec 13
0
Dovecot 2.3.9 - lmtp crashes with Signal 11
HI,
and the backtrace (essentially same as before except for the line numbers moved by the code changes):
Core was generated by `dovecot/lmtp'. [50/749]
Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
#0 decode_address_header (pool=pool at entry=0x5569a8e10550,
2012 Nov 04
1
Fw: 95% Q-Q Plot error message
Can someone please help with the below - thanks!
Warning messages:
1: Not plotting observations with leverage one:
7
2: Not plotting observations with leverage one:
7
> print(qqPlot(fit),envelop=.95);
Error in model.frame.default(formula = Y ~ X - 1, drop.unused.levels =
TRUE) :
variable lengths differ (found for 'X')
In addition: Warning message:
In matrix(yhat, n, reps) :
data
2012 Oct 03
2
Error in if (any(ch)) { : missing value where TRUE/FALSE needed
Can someone please help with the error message below?
thanks!
Start: AIC=-Inf
value ~ 1 + Core_CPI__ + GDP_change + Unemployment + housing +
interest + S_P + d1 + d2 + d3
Error in if (any(ch)) { : missing value where TRUE/FALSE needed
In addition: Warning message:
attempting model selection on an essentially perfect fit is nonsense
2009 Nov 12
1
Reading a data file one record at a time [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Dear r-help,
I have a radar data file in the following format:
nrays
for (1 to n_rays)
{ some_data_info
for (1 to n_gates)
{ some_data_info}
}
N_rays=360 and n_gates=950
The data looks something like:
Header line1
Ray1 header
gate1 var1, var2,.....,varN
...
gate950 var1, var2,.....,varN
Ray2 header
gate1 var1, var2,.....,varN
...