Displaying 20 results from an estimated 400 matches similar to: "Possible with enableJIT function"
2017 Jun 13
0
Possible with enableJIT function
Thanks. This should be resolved in R-devel(r72788) and R-patched
(r72789)
Best,
luke
On Mon, 12 Jun 2017, Berend Hasselman wrote:
>
>
> In this email to the R-help list: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2017-June/447474.html
> and in this question on Stackoverflow: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/44486643/nleqslv-memory-use-in-r
>
> Andrew Leach has raised a question
2017 Jun 11
1
Memory leak in nleqslv()
Hello all,
I am relatively new to R, but enjoying it very much. I am hoping that
someone on this list can help me with an issue I am having.
I am having issues with iterations over nleqslv, in that the solver
does not appear to clean up memory used in previous iterations. I
believe I've isolated the/my issue in a small sample of code:
library(nleqslv)
cons_ext_test <- function(x){
2012 Mar 20
2
SE from nleqslv
Dear R-users,
I use the "nleqslv" function to get parameter estimates by solving a system
of non-linear equations. But I also need standard error for each of
estimates. I checked the nleqslv manual but it didn't mention about SE.
Is there any way to get the SE for each estimate?
Thank you very much.
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2014 Aug 25
3
dubious behaviour of match.arg() with nested functions.
Dear all,
I initially ran into this problem while rebuilding a package dependent on
nleqslv. I got the following error:
Error in match.arg(global) : 'arg' must be of length 1
This didn't occur in previous versions of nleqslv, but did in the current
one (2.4). I think I pinned the problem down to the following example:
Take two functions:
test <-
2012 Dec 04
1
Solve system of equations (nleqslv) only returns origin
I'm solving 4 complex equations simultaneously. Code is below. The code
returns only zero's for the solution though there should also be a non-zero
result. I'm pretty confident that the equations are correct because they
are straight from a published paper and I checked them pretty thoroughly.
The parameter values I used are from the published paper as well. Any
suggestions for how
2017 Feb 09
3
Ancient C /Fortran code linpack error
> > On 9 Feb 2017, at 16:00, G?ran Brostr?m <goran.brostrom at umu.se> wrote:
> >
> > In my package 'glmmML' I'm using old C code and linpack in the optimizing procedure. Specifically, one part of the code looks like this:
> >
> > F77_CALL(dpoco)(*hessian, &bdim, &bdim, &rcond, work, info);
> > if (*info == 0){
> >
2017 Feb 10
1
Ancient C /Fortran code linpack error
> On 10 Feb 2017, at 14:53, G?ran Brostr?m <goran.brostrom at umu.se> wrote:
>
> Thanks to all who answered my third question. I learned something, but:
>
> On 2017-02-09 17:44, Martin Maechler wrote:
>>
>>>> On 9 Feb 2017, at 16:00, G?ran Brostr?m <goran.brostrom at umu.se> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> In my package 'glmmML'
2017 Aug 09
2
Package nleqslv ERROR
Dear all,
I am relatively new to R and have had some difficulty in understanding an error i get when running a code to solve a system of non-linear equations, with four equations and two variables.
This is my code:
ALPHA <- c(-0.0985168033402, 0.1, 0.15, 0.2, 0.25, 0.3, 0.35, 0.4)
BETA <- c(-0.0985168033402, 0.1, 0.15, 0.2, 0.25, 0.3, 0.35, 0.4)
GAMMA <- c(0.3940672148378, 0.1, 0.15,
2010 Jul 29
7
newton.method
Hi,
Is this method broken in R? I am using it to find roots of the following
function:
f(x) = 2.5*exp(-0.5*(2*0.045 - x)) + 2.5*exp(-0.045) + 2.5*exp(-1.5*x) - 100
It is giving an answer of -38.4762403 which is not even close (f(x) =
2.903809e+25 for x=-38.4762403). The answer should be around 0.01-0.1. This
function should converge..
Even for a simple function like f(x) = exp(-x) * x, it gives
2017 Aug 09
0
Package nleqslv ERROR
Santi,
In the second line of your function you have the following:
f <- numeric(length(x))
This sets the length of this numeric vector (i.e., "f") to the length of the vector "x".
Later, inside the function you assign to values to 4 elements of the vector "f".
This assumes that "f" is at least 4 element in length.
However, you define
2015 Aug 12
1
enableJIT in Rprofile leads to 'not a proper evaluation environment' on startup
A commenter on SO suggested that I copy my question to R-devel
http://stackoverflow.com/q/31972325/850781
I have had
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
library(compiler)
compiler::enableJIT(3)
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
in ~/.Rprofile for years; now that I upgraded to 3.2.1 I get this on startup:
2008 Dec 10
1
First call to constructor fails (R.oo)
Hi all,
I'm trying to do some object-oriented programming in R using the R.oo
package.
Right from the start I encountered a strange (at least for me) problem. I
define a new class/constructor based on the R.oo documentation.
However the first attempt to create an object fails:
=== Code: ===
library(R.oo);
setConstructorS3("MyClass",function(param) {
print(param);
2012 Apr 12
2
enableJIT(2) causes major slow-up in rpart
Hello,
Due to exploration of the JIT capabilities offered through the {compiler}
package, I came by the fact that using enableJIT(2) can *slow* the rpart
function (from the {rpart} package) by a magnitude of about 10 times.
Here is an example code to run:
library(rpart)
require(compiler)
enableJIT(0) # just making sure that JIT is off # We could also use
enableJIT(1) and it would be fine
fo
2012 Mar 19
1
enableJIT(3) with Primitives
I'm not sure if this is a bug or expected behavior, but I don't see
anything in the documentation that explains it, so I thought I'd
mention it:
~ michaelweylandt$ R -q --vanilla
library(compiler)
enableJIT(3)
`+` # Throws an error
`+` # Throws a warning
`+` # Prints the primitive as expected
sessionInfo()
R version 2.14.1 (2011-12-22)
Platform: i386-apple-darwin9.8.0/i386
2012 Mar 21
2
enableJIT() prohibits usual R debugging
Hi,
Browser doesn't work properly with the compiler enabled. It might be
intended behavior, but it's not documented.
compiler::enableJIT(1)
foo <- function(){
browser()
cat("here\n")
}
Browser doesn't stop, and I am getting:
> foo()
Called from: foo()
Browse[1]> here
>
Thanks,
Vitalie.
> sessionInfo()
R version 2.14.2 (2012-02-29)
Platform:
2013 Mar 22
1
R CMD check in R-3.0.0 gives warnings
I am running R CMD check on my package nleqslv with R-3.0.0 beta (2013-03-33 r62364) on Mac OS X 10.6.8
In contrast with R-2.15.3 R CMD check now issues a note for
- Mercurial version control files .hgignore, .hgtags and directory .hg. These are however included in .hidden_file_exclusions.
- typical Mac Finder files .DS_Store
All of these are ignored when executing R CMD check --as-cran.
I
2016 Mar 22
2
Installing LLVM 3.8 on Ubuntu 14.04
Still doesn't work:
a at a-VirtualBox:~$ sudo add-apt-repository 'deb http://llvm.org/apt/trusty/
llvm-toolchain-trusty-3.8 main'
a at a-VirtualBox:~$ sudo apt-get update
Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net trusty InRelease
Get:1 http://security.ubuntu.com trusty-security InRelease [65.9 kB]
Ign http://ie.archive.ubuntu.com trusty InRelease
Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net trusty Release.gpg
2010 Mar 09
1
rJava works on karmic for root but not for user sean
Good afternoon,
A strange one - library(rJava) works for root but not for user sean
On 64-bit Ubuntu 9.10, using R as root (sudo -i), I can say
library(rJava)
and it works fine with no error message of any kind. But logged in as
myself user "sean", it can't start...
sean at SeansPC:~$ R --no-save --vanilla
R version 2.10.1 (2009-12-14)
Copyright (C) 2009 The R Foundation for
2016 Mar 22
0
Installing LLVM 3.8 on Ubuntu 14.04
You want to look at the apt-add-repository command, basically you
provide that command like:
* sudo add-apt-repository 'deb http://llvm.org/apt/trusty/
llvm-toolchain-trusty-3.8 main'
* sudo apt-get update
* sudo apt-get install clang-3.8
Cheers,
-Neil.
On 22/03/16 17:44, Russell Wallace via llvm-dev wrote:
> What is the recommended way to install LLVM 3.8 on Ubuntu
2004 May 14
3
Psssst. The US is asleep - let's talk intern ationalization !!!
And let's also spell things properly! Like 'internationalisation' ...'Weasels have got into your phone system' instead of 'gotten into your phone system...'
And 'please press the hash key..' instead of 'pound key'
There should probably be en_uk, en_us, en_ca, en_za, en_nz, en_oz, en_ie and en_in etc to allow each English-speaking country to localise