similar to: Creating a private CRAN with webpages

Dear all, I am using the CRAN_package_db function to determine whether the head versions of certain packages match those I need. The parallel package though, is missing from the database: > pdb <- tools:::CRAN_package_db() > pdb[pdb$Package=="parallel",]["Package"] [1] Package <0 rows> (or 0-length row.names) Is this a bug that needs to be reported (where?) ?

Hi Lu?s, The parallel package is built-in, and so is not distributed via cran. You'll see the same thing for all the built in packages, e.g., > pdb[pdb$Package=="stats",]["Package"] [1] Package <0 rows> (or 0-length row.names) > pdb[pdb$Package=="splines",]["Package"] [1] Package <0 rows> (or 0-length row.names) >

Hi, I tried compiling the latest pre-release for R 3.3.3 for the NixOS Linux distribution [1], but the build fails during the "make check" phase because of the following 2 issues: 1) The "tools" test in "tests/Examples" requires network access, which it doesn't have in our build environment. Therefore, it fails as follows according to

Hi, In the DESCRIPTION file the ByteCompile and LazyLoading arguments appear to accept any value. >From the manual the field should be a "logical field". However, authors interpret this in a variety of ways: unique(tools::CRAN_package_db()$ByteCompile) # [1] NA "TRUE" "yes" "true" "Yes" "no" #

I'm trying to update my Matrix package given the update last night. But the following error is generated. I've tried restarting R and deleting my old Matrix package. Can anyone suggest how this might be resolved? > install.packages('Matrix') trying URL 'http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/languages/R/CRAN/bin/windows/contrib/2.1/Mat rix_0.98-1.zip' Content type

Windows XP. I have just updated to R 2.11.0 and then run update.packages. In the series of updates, a few will succeed, then I get a failure like package 'mvtnorm' successfully unpacked and MD5 sums checked package 'party' successfully unpacked and MD5 sums checked package 'PBSmodelling' successfully unpacked and MD5 sums checked Error in normalizePath(path) :

Hi I have been trawling the web, FAQs, and R manuals for help on the following issue, but have failed and was wondering if anyone has a solution to the following problem: After having installed R 2.6.2 for Windows (binary), I tried to install various packages. Every time I try loading a package (any package) via the built-in menu, I run into the following error message. >

In reference to the thread http://tolstoy.newcastle.edu.au/R/devel/04/10/0859.html I have the same problem updating packages with newly-installed version of released version of R 2.0.1. Previous posts refer to a bug in windows. I wonder if there is a work-around? This probably should go to R-help but it follows on from the post in R-devel. Apologies in advance. OS: Windows XP Professional,

I realize that others have struggled with this issue...i.e. http://tolstoy.newcastle.edu.au/~rking/R/help/05/01/9826.html i am on os.x 10.4 w/ R2.2, and am (perhaps foolishly) also on this quest... i would like to be able to install downloaded source (tar.gz'd) files from within an R session, and have it work in a X-platform way..i am often not connected to the internet and have libraries

> -----Original Message----- > From: Uwe Ligges [SMTP:ligges@statistik.uni-dortmund.de] > Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 5:38 PM > To: Walke, Rainer > Cc: R-devel > Subject: Re: [Rd] (PR#7163) Install packages does not work on Win2003 > server > > Walke, Rainer wrote: > > > >a) It works for me. > > >b) If it works for you on some Windows

I was wondering, is there any way to express in the IR that an instruction/instruction sequence/basic block/region/function/module/whatever is an alternate version of another? e.g. let's keep things simple and say that I have an instruction I. An optimization pass reads it and could be able to produce one or more functionally-equivalent instructions I1, ..., In without being really able

> I'm surprised this wasn't captured by the url checker on CRAN. As was I > Are you suggesting a new check on package descriptions for the urls present? Yes - but more fixing edge cases than a new check > In that case I guess it could be part of the standard R CMD check. Yep. Kurt's message suggests that these were edge cases that missed the check. Thanks > > Llu?s

Dear R community In a current paper, I'm (briefly) considering the topic of producing scatterplots or maps with point labels positioned in such a way as to minimize label overlap and occlusion. This is a topic with a large, but scattered literature. In CS, it is considered NP-hard, but there are a variety of approximate solutions. The most complete bibliography I've found is the

Hi, I would like to know what should I garantee about P and GGt in order to have F = Z %*% P %*% t(Z) + GGt always as a positive definite matrix. Being more precise: I am trying to find minimum likelihood parameters by using the function 'optim' to find the lowest value generated by $LogLik from the function 'fkf' (http://127.0.0.1:27262/library/FKF/html/fkf.html). The

Hi Matthias, Thanks for your hint! It is just for learning and practicing for me, just like migrate DragonEgg http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-September/117201.html the motivating is for learning from GCC and LLVM developers. 在 2017年12月19日 10:07, Matthias Braun 写道: > > >> On Dec 18, 2017, at 9:52 AM, Leslie Zhai via llvm-dev >> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org

I'm trying to perform a mantel test that ignores specific pairs in my distance matrices. The reasoning is that some geographic distances below a certain threshold suffer from spatial autocorrelation, or perhaps ecological relationships become less relevant that stochastic processes above a certain threshold. The problem is that I can't find a way to do it. If I replace values in either or

On May 8, 2012, at 11:37 PM, Ralf Karrenberg wrote: > On 5/9/12 2:01 AM, Dan Gohman wrote: >> >> On May 7, 2012, at 11:11 PM, Ralf Karrenberg<Chareos at gmx.de> wrote: >> >>> Hi Dan, >>> >>> I am using it to store results of a vectorization analysis. A BasicBlock has certain properties in this context, e.g. we mark control flow that may

Hello everybody I'm having some difficulties to design the decision tree algorithm J48. I am using the following code and when I run it gives me the following message plot(m1) Error in plot.Weka_tree(m1) : Plotting of trees with multi-way splits is currently not implemented. #The code library(RWeka) library(randomForest) library(party) if(require(mlbench, quietly = TRUE) &&

I didn't load the package. I wasn't able to do that, since I wasn't successfull to install it in first place with install.packages. -----Original Message----- From: Uwe Ligges [mailto:ligges@statistik.uni-dortmund.de] Sent: pon 2005-03-14 15:34 To: Gorjanc Gregor Cc: r-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch Subject: Re: [Rd] Package Installation in RGui (PR#7262) Under Windows, you cannot update /

Dear developers, I have a small but more or less well defined inquiry. Another, more general one for which I was not able to find information is towards the end of this messages. The question seems to be too technical for R-help, that is why I post it here. When installing packages (Windows XP), occasionally the installation does not complete because, it seems, Windows locks some files.