similar to: Philosophy behind converting Fortran to C for use in R

Here are three reasons for converting Fortran code, especially older Fortran code, to C: 1. The C-Fortran interface is not standardized. Various Fortran compilers pass logical and character arguments in various ways. Various Fortran compilers mangle function and common block names in variousl ways. You can avoid that problem by restricting R to using a certain Fortran compiler, but that can

Hello. I am trying to invert a matrix, and I am finding that I can get different answers depending on whether I set LAPACK true or false using "qr". I had understood that LAPACK is, in general more robust and faster than LINPACK, so I am confused as to why I am getting what seems to be invalid answers. The matrix is ostensibly the Hessian for a function I am optimizing. I want to get

On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 1:40 AM, Hsiu-Khuern Tang <tangoh at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 8:54 PM, Avraham Adler <avraham.adler at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I successfully rebuilt R-devel_2015-03-09 with the most recent version >> of Rtools tonight, building both ICU_531 and this time libcurl (7.39) >> as well (and OpenBLAS, of course). The

Hello. I seem to be having the same problem that Paul had in the thread titled "[Rd] R 2.15.2 make check failure on 32-bit --with-blas="-lgoto2"" from October of last year <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2012-October/065103.html> Unfortunately, that thread ended without an answer to his last question. Briefly, I am trying to compile an Rblas for Windows NT 32bit

On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 1:23 PM, Hsiu-Khuern Tang <tangoh at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 10:47 PM, Avraham Adler <avraham.adler at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 1:40 AM, Hsiu-Khuern Tang <tangoh at gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 8:54 PM, Avraham Adler <avraham.adler at gmail.com> wrote: >>>>

On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 3:30 PM, peter dalgaard <pdalgd at gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 31 Jan 2017, at 18:56 , Avraham Adler <avraham.adler at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hello. >> >> When trying to unpack today's version of R-patched, > > From which source? The files from cran.r-project.org seems OK, both those in src/base-prerelease and those from

On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 10:57 AM, peter dalgaard <pdalgd at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 01 Sep 2015, at 16:21 , Avraham Adler <avraham.adler at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hello. >> >> There used to be changelog of sorts for R-devel [1] and R-release [2]. >> Neither have been updated since 2015-07-24. Have these moved >> elsewhere, or are they no longer

Hello. There used to be changelog of sorts for R-devel [1] and R-release [2]. Neither have been updated since 2015-07-24. Have these moved elsewhere, or are they no longer being updated? Thank you, Avi [1] <http://developer.r-project.org/blosxom.cgi/R-devel/NEWS> [2] <http://developer.r-project.org/blosxom.cgi/R-3-2-branch/NEWS>

Hello. When trying to unpack today's version of R-patched, I get the following error: C:\R>tar -xf R-patched_2017-01-30.tar.gz gzip: stdin: unexpected end of file tar: Unexpected EOF in archive tar: Unexpected EOF in archive tar: Error is not recoverable: exiting now I got the same error for R-patched_2017-01-30.tar.gz but not for R-3.3.2.tar.gz. Thank you, Avi

It is not obvious what it is that you are calling "R-patched", nor where there could be an entry for "3.6.2 patched". The prerelease/patched versions are snapshots of R-3-6-branch made at 00:20 so the current one will have been made before the release version run started at 09:00 this morning, and hence the nightly tarball will be of the release candidate. However it will not

Hello. I am trying to optimize a set of parameters using /optim/ in which the actual function to be minimized contains matrix multiplication and is of the form: SUM ((A%*%X - B)^2) where A is a matrix and X and B are vectors, with X as parameter vector. This has worked well so far. Recently, I was given a data set A of size 360440 x 1173, which could not be handled as a normal matrix. I

On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote: > > That's a bug. I haven't tracked down what's going wrong with our > regular code. If I can't find that and fix it soon, I'll make Internet2 > the default. For now, you can do it yourself using the instructions on > ?setInternet2. > > Duncan Murdoch I

I am working on compiling R-3.6.0 for Windows 10 64bit using rtools40 (beta 11). I had also installed the most recent update of Inno setup, which is now 6.0.2.With that version, `make risntaller` fails at the call to ""C:/R/Inno/iscc" R.iss > R-3.6.0.log 2>&1" and just exits, pointing to line 175 of the makefile which is: $(RPREFIX)-win.exe: R.iss

I believe that repo just follows the directions on my blog. Without seeing Dr. Hodges?s code, my initial concern is the many references to Cygwin. My method specifically does not use Cygwin but MSYS2 and Mingw64/Rtools35. That will likely change to solely Rtools40 once R3.6 is released due to the Msys system being built in to it. There may be some library conflicts between Cygwin and

Hello. I have successfully built R on windows scores of times, and have never come across this problem. For this build, I am using the current 4.6.3 prerelease version of Rtools, Windows7 64 bit, and R-devel_2015-09-14.tar.gz When running make check, I get the following error: running code in 'reg-packages.R' ...make[3]: *** [reg-packages.Rout] Error 1 make[2]: *** [test-Reg] Error 2

Hello. When trying to compile R-3.0.2 on Windows 7 64bit, I get an error relating to "alone_decoder.c: Permission denied." The entire error code is copied below. gcc -std=gnu99 -m64 -shared -o Riconv.dll Riconv.def win_iconv.o touch stamp gcc -std=gnu99 -m64 -I../../include -I. -Iapi -DLZMA_API_STATIC -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DWIN32 -O3 -Wall -pedantic -march=core-avx-i -O3 --param

On 2020-01-19 13:01, Avraham Adler wrote: > Crazy thought, but being that a sum of Poissons is Poisson in the sum, > can you break your ?big? simulation into the sum of a few smaller > ones? Or is the order of magnitude difference just too great? ????? I don't perceive that as feasible.? Once I found what was generating NAs, it was easy to code a function to return pseudo-random

On my Mac: str(.Machine) ... $ integer.max????????? : int 2147483647 ?$ sizeof.long????????? : int 8 ?$ sizeof.longlong????? : int 8 ?$ sizeof.longdouble??? : int 16 ?$ sizeof.pointer?????? : int 8 ????? On a Windows 10 machine I have, $ sizeof.long : int 4; otherwise the same as on my Mac. ????? Am I correct that $ sizeof.long = 4 means 4 bytes = 32 bits? log2(.Machine$integer.max)

Hello. I've compiled R on Windows many times, and this is the first time I've seen this error. While running make check-all (and using testInstalledBasic("both")), the lm-tests routines fail, and, as far as I can tell, the diff is failing because in one file, answers are coming back like this "3.11e-004" while in the save file they are "3.11e-04". Every value

????? This issue arose for me in simulations to estimate confidence, prediction, and tolerance intervals from glm(., family=poisson) fits embedded in a BMA::bic.glm fit using a simulate.bic.glm function I added to the development version of Ecfun, available at "https://github.com/sbgraves237/Ecfun".? This is part of a vignette I'm developing, available at