similar to: [bug] in cut.POSIXt(..., breaks = <numeric>)

Muchas gracias, Probaré eso también y ya os cuento. Jaume. El lun., 17 feb. 2020 a las 22:10, Javier Marcuzzi (< javier.ruben.marcuzzi en gmail.com>) escribió: > Estimado Jaume Tormo > > En lo personal yo utilizo un enfoque como el que comenta Carlos Ortega, se > me ocurre que posiblemente funcione si a su código le coloca algo de > formato, me refiero a esta forma: >

I have some data that includes timestamps like this: 2017-02-28T13:35:00+03:00 The documentation for strptime says that %z expects an offset like 0300. I don't see any way in the documentation to get it to accept +hh:mm with a colon separator, and everything I tried gave me NA as the answer. Section 4.2.5.1 of ISO 8601:2004(E) allows both the absence of colons in +hh[mm] (basic format) and

Hi I have been trying so many different things to get my Inverse Mills Ratio going for a Two stage Heckman Model, I have tried the following so far (the commands are listed below till teh point where I get an error), I get an error in the last sentence (marked in bold below), if this were successful then I could have used the IMR as a control in my OLS (which would be the OLS for the outcome

Dear List, With regard to the question I previously raised, here is the result I obtained right now, brglm() does help, but there are two situations: 1) Classifiers with extremely high AIC (over 200), no perfect separation, coefficients converge. in this case, using brglm() does help! It stabilize the AIC, and the classification power is better. Code and output: (need to install package:

Problem: I am sorting through model selection process for first time and want to make sure that I have used glm, stepAIC, and update correctly. Something is strange because I get a different result between: 1) a glm of 12 predictor variables followed by a stepAIC where all interactions are considered and then an update to remove one specific interaction. vs. 2) entering all the terms