similar to: Hyperbolic tangent different results on Windows and Mac

>>>>> Rodrigo Zepeda <rzepeda17 at gmail.com> >>>>> on Fri, 17 Mar 2017 12:56:06 -0600 writes: > Dear all, > We seem to have found a "strange" behaviour in the hyperbolic tangent > function tanh on Windows. > When running tanh(356 + 0i) the Windows result is NaN + 0.i while on Mac > the result is 1 + 0i. It

For future reference: https://sourceforge.net/p/mingw-w64/mailman/message/35747206/ On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Jeroen Ooms <jeroenooms at gmail.com> wrote: > This looks like a bug in mingw-w64 CRT. The problem can be produced > with C++ without R: > > #include <iostream> > #include <cmath> > #include <complex> > > int main(){ >

For a while I have been getting that the complex tests fails on RHEL 6. The specific issue has to do with tanh (see below for full output from complex.Rout.fail). This is both with the stock compiler (GCC 4.4.7) and a compiler supplied through the conda project (GCC 4.8.5). The compiler supplied through conda ends up linking R to certain system files, so the binary is not completely independent

Thanks. I assume there is no way to control this via. environment variables or configure settings? Obviously that would be great for something like this which affects tests and seems to be a known problem for older C standard libraries. Best, Kasper On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 9:12 AM, Tomas Kalibera <tomas.kalibera at gmail.com> wrote: > > As a quick fix, you can undefine HAVE_CTANH

Thanks for the report, handled in configure in 72661 (R-devel). I'll also port to R-patched. Best Tomas On 05/04/2017 03:49 PM, Tomas Kalibera wrote: > > There is no way to control this at runtime. > We will probably have to add a configure test. > > Best, > Tomas > > On 05/04/2017 03:23 PM, Kasper Daniel Hansen wrote: >> Thanks. >> >> I assume there

How to use the package generalized hyperbolic distribution in order to estimate the four parameters in the NIG-distribution? I have a data material with stock returns that I want to fit the parameters to. -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Generalized-Hyperbolic-distribution-tp3504369p3504369.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Hi, I want to fit a standardized generalized hyperbolic distribution to my data. I am aware, that I can do this with the dsgh command of the fBasics package along with the optim command. My problem is, that I also want to have a derivation of it. So I need the theory behind it, i.e. I need the formula of the probability density function which they use and the derivation of it. I thought about

Hi, I want to fit standardized generalized hyperbolic distribution to my data. I am aware, that I can do this with the dsgh command of the fBasics package along with the optim command. My problem is, that I also want to have a derivation of it. So I need the theory behind it, i.e. I need the formula of the probability density function which they use and the derivation of it. I thought about

Why fails nls with "singular gradient" here? I post a minimal example on the bottom and would be very happy if someone could help me. Kind regards, ########### # define some constants smallc <- 0.0001 t <- seq(0,1,0.001) t0 <- 0.5 tau1 <- 0.02 # generate yy(t) yy <- 1/2 * ( 1- tanh((t - t0)/smallc) * exp(-t / tau1) ) + rnorm(length(t))*0.01 # show the curve

On Tuesday 17 February 2009 09:46:07 Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi, > > > Lennart Augustsson mentioned on his blog that he got substantial > > performance improvements by conveying to LLVM when external functions > > (e.g. tanh) were pure. > > first note that tanh is not pure, because the result depends on the current > floating point rounding mode. Ugh. > However,

Dear all R-users, I would like to draw a tangent of a given function for a particular (given) point. However the straight line representing it should not cut any axis, it should be a small line. Can anyone tell me how to do this? Thanks, Arun [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi everyone, I noticed today that LLVM's constant folding of math library functions can lead to minor differences in results. A colleague sent me the following test case which demonstrates the issue: #include <stdio.h> #include <math.h> typedef union { double d; unsigned long long i; } my_dbl; int main(void) { my_dbl res, x; x.i = 0x3feeb39556255de2ull; res.d =

Lennart Augustsson mentioned on his blog that he got substantial performance improvements by conveying to LLVM when external functions (e.g. tanh) were pure. How is this done? -- Dr Jon Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. http://www.ffconsultancy.com/?e

Full_Name: Peter Fortini Version: 2.0.1 OS: Windows 2000 Submission from: (NULL) (65.246.187.164) When the imaginary part of the argument is very large, the complex tangent function returns 0+NaNi. For example, tan(1+1000i)=0+NaNi; it should be 0+1i Easy to fix in complex.c, as the original NaN came from division of sinh and cosh that had reached machine infinity. static void z_tan(Rcomplex

Hello Les, Thanks for that info. I'm playing with this now and although the 'failover' process seems rather slow, it does seem to be doing what I need. I setup a subdomain entry to point to 4 IP's, only one if which is actually working, and indeed, when IE get's a non-active IP, it eventually goes to the next one until it finally finds the actual live IP. Once it gets the

Thanks, Hal. I hear what you are saying about the accuracy. The problem, from my perspective, is trying to explain to users what they are going to get. The constant folding may be as accurate as the lib call would have been, but it isn't necessarily value safe. I've been operating on the assumption that LLVM's FP optimizations are value safe unless fast math flags are used. For the

Hi, > Lennart Augustsson mentioned on his blog that he got substantial performance > improvements by conveying to LLVM when external functions (e.g. tanh) were > pure. first note that tanh is not pure, because the result depends on the current floating point rounding mode. However, if you are willing to sacrifice complete numerical correctness, you can give llvm-gcc the -ffast-math

I hate following up to myself, but I thought a clarification of one point (specifically WRT RC5 which was mentioned in the original question) might be worthwhile...because what I should have said originally was that "To the best of my non-legally- admissible knowledge, however, none of the algorithms in the current *OpenSSH* implementation are currently encumbered by patents that would

On 4/16/19 4:18 PM, Amara Emerson wrote: On Apr 16, 2019, at 1:47 PM, Kaylor, Andrew via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: Thanks, Hal. I hear what you are saying about the accuracy. The problem, from my perspective, is trying to explain to users what they are going to get. The constant folding may be as accurate as the lib call would

The file src/share/replaygain_synthesis/include/private/fast_float_math_hack.h redefines 'tanh' as 'tanhf'. This file is intended for Intel Compiler only, but it includes outdated mathf.h and doesn't work with current versions of ICC. The fixes are trivial though, and I compiled 2 versions of flac.exe: with this 'hack' turned off an on. The difference in decoding speed