similar to: Unexpected EOF in R-patched_2017-01-30

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 8000 matches similar to: "Unexpected EOF in R-patched_2017-01-30"

2017 Jan 31
3
Unexpected EOF in R-patched_2017-01-30
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 3:30 PM, peter dalgaard <pdalgd at gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 31 Jan 2017, at 18:56 , Avraham Adler <avraham.adler at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hello. >> >> When trying to unpack today's version of R-patched, > > From which source? The files from cran.r-project.org seems OK, both those in src/base-prerelease and those from
2017 Feb 01
0
Unexpected EOF in R-patched_2017-01-30
>>>>> Avraham Adler <avraham.adler at gmail.com> >>>>> on Tue, 31 Jan 2017 16:07:20 -0500 writes: > On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 3:30 PM, peter dalgaard <pdalgd at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On 31 Jan 2017, at 18:56 , Avraham Adler <avraham.adler at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hello.
2015 Sep 01
3
Has the changelog for R-devel and R-patched moved?
Hello. There used to be changelog of sorts for R-devel [1] and R-release [2]. Neither have been updated since 2015-07-24. Have these moved elsewhere, or are they no longer being updated? Thank you, Avi [1] <http://developer.r-project.org/blosxom.cgi/R-devel/NEWS> [2] <http://developer.r-project.org/blosxom.cgi/R-3-2-branch/NEWS>
2015 Mar 11
2
Notes on building a gcc toolchain for Rtools (but not multilib)
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 1:40 AM, Hsiu-Khuern Tang <tangoh at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 8:54 PM, Avraham Adler <avraham.adler at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I successfully rebuilt R-devel_2015-03-09 with the most recent version >> of Rtools tonight, building both ICU_531 and this time libcurl (7.39) >> as well (and OpenBLAS, of course). The
2019 Apr 28
2
Inno Setup 6.0.2 fails before creating exe file on Windows (R-3.6.0)
I am working on compiling R-3.6.0 for Windows 10 64bit using rtools40 (beta 11). I had also installed the most recent update of Inno setup, which is now 6.0.2.With that version, `make risntaller` fails at the call to ""C:/R/Inno/iscc" R.iss > R-3.6.0.log 2>&1" and just exits, pointing to line 175 of the makefile which is: $(RPREFIX)-win.exe: R.iss
2015 Sep 01
2
Has the changelog for R-devel and R-patched moved?
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 10:57 AM, peter dalgaard <pdalgd at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 01 Sep 2015, at 16:21 , Avraham Adler <avraham.adler at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hello. >> >> There used to be changelog of sorts for R-devel [1] and R-release [2]. >> Neither have been updated since 2015-07-24. Have these moved >> elsewhere, or are they no longer
2017 Jun 06
2
Philosophy behind converting Fortran to C for use in R
Hello. This is not a question about a bug or even best practices; rather I'm trying to understand the philosophy or theory as to why certain portions of the R codebase are written as they are. If this question is better posed elsewhere, please point me in the proper direction. In the thread about the issues with the Tukey line, Martin said [1]: > when this topic came up last (for me) in
2020 Jan 19
2
rpois(9, 1e10)
On 2020-01-19 13:01, Avraham Adler wrote: > Crazy thought, but being that a sum of Poissons is Poisson in the sum, > can you break your ?big? simulation into the sum of a few smaller > ones? Or is the order of magnitude difference just too great? ????? I don't perceive that as feasible.? Once I found what was generating NAs, it was easy to code a function to return pseudo-random
2019 Feb 28
3
Problem with compiling OpenBLAS to work with R
I believe that repo just follows the directions on my blog. Without seeing Dr. Hodges?s code, my initial concern is the many references to Cygwin. My method specifically does not use Cygwin but MSYS2 and Mingw64/Rtools35. That will likely change to solely Rtools40 once R3.6 is released due to the Msys system being built in to it. There may be some library conflicts between Cygwin and
2020 Jan 19
2
rpois(9, 1e10)
On my Mac: str(.Machine) ... $ integer.max????????? : int 2147483647 ?$ sizeof.long????????? : int 8 ?$ sizeof.longlong????? : int 8 ?$ sizeof.longdouble??? : int 16 ?$ sizeof.pointer?????? : int 8 ????? On a Windows 10 machine I have, $ sizeof.long : int 4; otherwise the same as on my Mac. ????? Am I correct that $ sizeof.long = 4 means 4 bytes = 32 bits? log2(.Machine$integer.max)
2015 Mar 11
2
Notes on building a gcc toolchain for Rtools (but not multilib)
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote: > > That's a bug. I haven't tracked down what's going wrong with our > regular code. If I can't find that and fix it soon, I'll make Internet2 > the default. For now, you can do it yourself using the instructions on > ?setInternet2. > > Duncan Murdoch I
2015 Jan 07
2
Failing lm-tests due to extra 0 in scientific notation?
Hello. I've compiled R on Windows many times, and this is the first time I've seen this error. While running make check-all (and using testInstalledBasic("both")), the lm-tests routines fail, and, as far as I can tell, the diff is failing because in one file, answers are coming back like this "3.11e-004" while in the save file they are "3.11e-04". Every value
2018 Feb 09
2
R Compilation gets stuck on Windows 64
On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 2:16 AM, Indrajit Sen Gupta <indrajitsg at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Avraham, > > A quick question - I realized I did not have Perl installed. So I installed > ActiveState Perl right now. Also I see I need texinfo and texi2any. I was > able to installed texinfo from here: > http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net/packages/texinfo.htm. But not sure where to >
2023 Nov 14
1
Segmentation fault early in compilation of revision 85514
On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 12:45?PM Avraham Adler <avraham.adler at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 1:13?AM Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org> wrote: > > > > > > Avi, > > > > Might be toolchain-dependent, might be options-dependent--it built fine here. > > Easier for you to vary option two so maybe try that? > > > >
2020 Jan 19
2
rpois(9, 1e10)
????? This issue arose for me in simulations to estimate confidence, prediction, and tolerance intervals from glm(., family=poisson) fits embedded in a BMA::bic.glm fit using a simulate.bic.glm function I added to the development version of Ecfun, available at "https://github.com/sbgraves237/Ecfun".? This is part of a vignette I'm developing, available at
2013 May 28
3
R-3.0.1 - "transient" make check failure in splines-EX.r
Hello. I seem to be having the same problem that Paul had in the thread titled "[Rd] R 2.15.2 make check failure on 32-bit --with-blas="-lgoto2"" from October of last year <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2012-October/065103.html> Unfortunately, that thread ended without an answer to his last question. Briefly, I am trying to compile an Rblas for Windows NT 32bit
2015 Mar 11
1
Notes on building a gcc toolchain for Rtools (but not multilib)
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 1:23 PM, Hsiu-Khuern Tang <tangoh at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 10:47 PM, Avraham Adler <avraham.adler at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 1:40 AM, Hsiu-Khuern Tang <tangoh at gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 8:54 PM, Avraham Adler <avraham.adler at gmail.com> wrote: >>>>
2018 Jan 10
5
OpenBLAS in everyday R?
I didn't do the compile; is there a way to check whether that was used? If not, I'll inquire with our sysadmin and report back. In any case, my suggestion was motivated by the fact that some parts of R use OpenMP while others do not, in the hope that the former could have their OpenBLAS omelet without breaking the OpenMP eggs, so to speak. On 01/09/2018 06:41 PM, Keith O'Hara
2020 Jan 19
2
rpois(9, 1e10)
So imagine rpois is changed, such that the storage mode of its return value is sometimes integer and sometimes numeric. Then imagine the case where lambda is itself a realization of a random variable. Do we really want the storage mode to inherit that randomness? On 1/19/20 10:47 AM, Avraham Adler wrote: > Maybe there should be code for 64 bit R to use long long or the like? > > On
2023 Nov 13
1
Segmentation fault early in compilation of revision 85514
On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 1:13?AM Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org> wrote: > > > Avi, > > Might be toolchain-dependent, might be options-dependent--it built fine here. > Easier for you to vary option two so maybe try that? > > Dirk Thank you, Dirk. I think it was more a PEBCAK issue. When I deleted the entire trunk folder and started the process from scratch, it