similar to: different compilers and mzR build fails

I do this on a vanilla-clean R installation, simply: > biocLite("mzR") it pulls some deps in which compile fine, only mzR fails. ... meanwhile... I grabbed devtools and comiled github master - still fails. Should I attach build log? One should not send attachments to the list.. I don't suppose? On 21/12/16 17:06, Martin Morgan wrote: > mzR is a Bioconductor package, so

mzR is a Bioconductor package, so better to ask on the Bioconductor support forum https://support.bioconductor.org Oh, I see you did, and then the advice is to avoid cross-posting! The missing .o files would have been produced in an earlier compilation step; they likely failed in some way, so you need to provide the complete compilation output. Did you do this on a version of the package

Hi everyone, I have this kind of raw dataset : - <Temp diffgr:id="Temp14" msdata:rowOrder="13"> <Date>2005-01-17T00:00:00+05:30</Date> <SecurityID>10149</SecurityID> <PriceClose>1288.40002</PriceClose> </Temp> - <Temp diffgr:id="Temp15" msdata:rowOrder="14">

On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 01:58:55PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > stop_machine can take a very long time if the hypervisor does > overcommitment for guest CPUs. When waiting for "the one", lets > give up our CPU by using the new cpu_relax_yield. This seems something that would apply to most other virt stuff. Lets Cc a few more lists for that. > Signed-off-by:

On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 01:58:55PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > stop_machine can take a very long time if the hypervisor does > overcommitment for guest CPUs. When waiting for "the one", lets > give up our CPU by using the new cpu_relax_yield. This seems something that would apply to most other virt stuff. Lets Cc a few more lists for that. > Signed-off-by:

Hi, I have transformed a Lexis object to a msdata object and tried to apply expand.covs() on this object, but I got an error message: "Error in expand.covs... 'data' must be an 'msdata' object". I need to change the class of data to msdata, but don't know how to do it. Thanks in advance, Kadriye -- View this message in context:

Some time ago commit 57f2ffe14fd125c2 ("s390: remove diag 44 calls from cpu_relax()") did stop cpu_relax on s390 yielding to the hypervisor. As it turns out this made stop_machine run really slow on virtualized overcommited systems. For example the kprobes test during bootup took several seconds instead of just running unnoticed with large guests. Therefore, the yielding was

On Fri, 21 Oct 2016 14:05:36 +0200 Peter Zijlstra <peterz at infradead.org> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 01:58:55PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > > stop_machine can take a very long time if the hypervisor does > > overcommitment for guest CPUs. When waiting for "the one", lets > > give up our CPU by using the new cpu_relax_yield. > > This

On 10/22/2016 02:06 AM, Nicholas Piggin wrote: > On Fri, 21 Oct 2016 14:05:36 +0200 > Peter Zijlstra <peterz at infradead.org> wrote: > >> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 01:58:55PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >>> stop_machine can take a very long time if the hypervisor does >>> overcommitment for guest CPUs. When waiting for "the one", lets

Hi r-devel, a recent install of R-3.4.0 RC (2017-04-13 r72510)? on Linux (Ubuntu 16.04.1 LTS) x86_64-linux-gnu? with?g++ (Ubuntu 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.4) 5.4.0 20160609 (see?http://bioconductor.org/checkResults/devel/bioc-LATEST/malbec2-NodeInfo.html?for more)? results in CXXFLAGS not containing "-O2" as optimisation flag, there is only " -Wall", while?CFLAGS are happy with

陳韋任 wrote: > > Does your maching have directories like /lib64 and /usr/lib64? > Yes, it has /lib64 and /usr/lib64. > > > what is the size of a void pointer? > $ ./a.out > sizeof (void*) : 8 > > > Does this change if you add -m64 to the gcc command line? > No. Ok, as far as I cam tell, everything on your system is correct. I don't have any further ideas

On 06/15/2014 06:17 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra<peterz at infradead.org> > --- [...] > + > +void kvm_wait(int *ptr, int val) > +{ > + unsigned long flags; > + > + if (in_nmi()) > + return; > + > + /* > + * Make sure an interrupt handler can't upset things in a > + * partially setup state. > + */ I am seeing hang

On 06/15/2014 06:17 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra<peterz at infradead.org> > --- [...] > + > +void kvm_wait(int *ptr, int val) > +{ > + unsigned long flags; > + > + if (in_nmi()) > + return; > + > + /* > + * Make sure an interrupt handler can't upset things in a > + * partially setup state. > + */ I am seeing hang

Hi All, I try to build a cross-compiler that compiles for powerpc but runs on my pentium. As a base I used the arm cross-compiler script but changed: CROSS_HOST="x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu" CROSS_TARGET="powerpc-linux" CROSS_MARCH="750" LLVM is building ok, but the second step: building llvm-gcc fails with a rather strange error which I appended to the end of this

Can anyone explain the following behavior to me? [jgreen at t-rex ~]$ nslookup proteome.hpcc.triad.local Server: 127.0.0.1 Address: 127.0.0.1#53 Name: proteome.hpcc.triad.local Address: 10.2.149.1 [jgreen at t-rex ~]$ nslookup proteome.vlan88.hpcc.triad.local Server: 127.0.0.1 Address: 127.0.0.1#53 Name: proteome.vlan88.hpcc.triad.local Address: 192.168.88.179

I have to compare four different grape varieties proteome in two different years. I don't know what test would be more suitable for my data. I think that an anova two way can be usefull also if someone suggested me to perform a manova. In addiction, I can perform each test on a single protein a time, but I can't loose my whole life carrying out anova (I have more than 1000 protein to

Hi, is there a way to color the branches or text label of the branches of dendrograms e.g. from hclust() according to a grouping variable. Here I have something in mind like: http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/content/dam/sigma-aldrich/life-science/biowire/biowire-fall-2010/proteome-figure-1.Par.0001.Image.gif (ectodermal, endodermal, mesodermal). /johannes

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jack Andersen via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > To: "llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2016 10:39:53 PM > Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] [MC] Target-Independent Small Data Section Handling > > Just pinging this patch for review, particularly from PPC > maintainers:

Just pinging this patch for review, particularly from PPC maintainers: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26344 It's now rebased for the latest master commits, `check-all` test results match those of the upstream base. There is also a clang driver patch, extending PPC target support for the `-G` flag: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26345 And lld patch implementing the _SDA_BASE_ symbols and includes an

Hallo, Im trying to find out how to tabulate frequencies of factors when the data have a frequency variable. e,g: i<-rep(1:5,2) j<-rep(1:2,5) N<-10*i+j table(i,j) gives a table of ones as each combination occurs only once. How does one get a table with the corresponding N's? Thanks! Gerrit. -- Gerrit Draisma Department of Public Health Erasmus MC, University Medical Center