similar to: Proxy-ARP on Same Segment

Hi, I'm trying to set up NFSv4 on two boxes (centos 5.5) and have it authenticate against our Windows 2008R2 AD server acting as the KDC. (samba/winbind is running ok with "idmap config MYCOMPANY: backend = rid" so we have identical ids across the servers.) I can mount my test directory fine via NFSv4 *without* the sec=krb5 option. However, once I put the sec=krb5 option in,

Hi everybody I have a Problem with Masquerading from my local net (loc) to my VPN (loc2). I can reach every Service from loc2 in loc, but I can''t get reach any service from loc in loc2. Has somebody an Idea where my mistake is ? Without shorewall, it was working. Thanks for helping Lars Technical Information : Shorewall 2.0.13 Suse 9.0 *177.177.77.X The first 3 Counts are changed

I''m getting my zones confused. Help. I need to have a bunch of systems using OpenVPN to gain an IP in the virtual subnet 10.100.1.0/24, on interface tun0. I will then route whole subnets to those IPs, like 10.100.2.0/24 via 10.100.1.12, etc. I want to have a policy for: - all hosts behind tun0 - all hosts in 10.100.1.0/24 - individual subnets being routed through IPs in

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=443 Summary: 2.6 kernel failing in NAT with significant outbound traffic Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: i386 OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: P2 Component: NAT AssignedTo:

Client is a centos-3.4 box, Server (DC) is Windows 2K AD. I'm able to see user and group accounts on the DC but not able to authenticate against it. wbinfo -a does not rely on pam module, correct? [root@linux04 root]# net ads testjoin Join is OK [root@linux04 root]# net ads info LDAP server: 172.16.100.202 LDAP server name: p69ms101 Realm: PORTSEATTLE.ORG Bind Path: dc=PORTSEATTLE,dc=ORG

Hello, I'm running redhat enterprise as 3.2 with the included samba 3.0.2-6.3E. I'm trying to make this a domain member server in a nt4 domain. I've successfully joined the domain only after using the net join -p 139 option to force samba to use port 139, otherwise it kept trying to communicate over port 445. (I was watching the syn packets with tethereal). Typing wbinfo -g comes

Hi We are having some problems with connecting to samba. We have samba 3.0.14a on suse linux with LDAP enabled! im using "smbclient -L //server -U user" to test a connection Some times we get an instant response and other times we get "session setup failed: NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE" or "NT_STATUS_UNSUCESSFUL" I havent got a clue what's going on, sometimes it

Hi, I'm getting a segmentation fault as follows: ---<--------------------cut here---------------start------------------->--- R> begt <- as.POSIXct(strptime("10/01/2009 06:00:00", format="%d/%m/%Y %H:%M:%S"), + tz="GMT") R> tser <- seq(begt, by=5, length.out=91000) R> tser.trunc <- format(tser) Error: segfault from C

Sorry if this is a stupid question but I tried reading, studying and finding solution but am not making it alone :) On my home lan I have a Linux (Debian sid) box (192.168.174.244) running 3.0.10 samba and cups 1.1.23. My objective is to print from this box to the other home PC which is running XP (192.168.174.242) and sharing an Epson R200 printer. Follows the troubleshooting I could do

I've been trying to join Samba 4.05 stable to an existing Windows 2000 domain but keep getting an LDAP error 50 - LDAP_INSUFFICIENT_ACCESS_RIGHTS despite attempting to joining with the Windows administrator account. I did a capture of the network traffic generated by the failure for more information on what's going on and discovered the following: First Samba does an LDAP ROOT bind

Hello all, I'm not sure if this is a bug. It's probably just an upgrade note. In summary I had no namespace section in my 2.0.17 config. When trying out 2.1rc5 no user could login because of a namespace error. 2.1rc5 adds a default namespace clause which broke my logins (It was noted in the changelog) I seemed to fix it by just putting this in the config file: namespace inbox {

Hi, If I delete a folder "foo" in Thunderbird, it is moved to trash. [root at dovecot1][tmp:exec](~) # ll /mailspool1/xxxx.de/test1/mdbox/mailboxes/Trash/ insgesamt 16K drwx------ 4 vmail vmail 4,0K 31. Jan 22:16 . drwx------ 8 vmail vmail 4,0K 31. Jan 22:16 .. drwx------ 2 vmail vmail 4,0K 12. Feb 11:51 dbox-Mails drwx------ 3 vmail vmail 4,0K 31. Jan 22:16 foo [root at

I''m having a problem where transferring files accross our IPsec gateway to another host on a remote network is failing. I see no packets being rejected in the logs. Attached is a packet trace, showing the problem. In this case, 10.100.0.0/24 is the local network and 10.100.14.0/24 is the remote network. The trace was taken on the local gateway. In the trace, there is a set of TCP

I'm trying to get Samba up and running and having a terrible time. It says that I should be able to run nmap and see that 137 and 139 are open - which they are not. I have not added any restrictions in smb.conf, do not have a firewall running and I have increased the log level to 5 to see all of the messages. It says that it is talking on 137 but it kind of looks like it's not talking

Hi, I''m running shorewall-2.0.8-1mdk with iptables-1.2.9-7.1.101mdk on kernel-2.4.22-30mdk, Mandrake 10.1 (kernel-2.6.8.1.10mdk-1-1mdk is installed, but I haven''t rebooted yet). I get a significant number of newnotsyn packet denials from existing, valid connections. Most of these seem to be on port 80 and port 25, and directionality doesn''t seem to matter (I run

Hello, I''ve been doing some tests on a firewall system running Shorewall 1.4, and have been getting some unexpected behavior when enabling the "newnotsyn" option. In the test setup, I have: ---------------------------------------- /etc/shorewall/interfaces net eth0 detect routefilter,tcpflags,blacklist loc eth1 10.0.0.255 dhcp,tcpflags,newnotsyn

HI, My system been attacked from someone I guess, kindly check the link below How can I stop the ircd attack http://pastebin.com/tbjh5qzP regards ********************************************* No employee or agent is authorized to conclude any binding agreement on behalf of Xplorium with another party by e-mail without express written confirmation by an officer of Xplorium. Any

Hi, I have shorewall version 1.4.10g on Redhat 9 Local clients are on eth1 in subnet 192.168.3.0/24. eth0 is for the outside (over xdsl with includes a ppp0 interface). Nessus (nessusd) is installed *on the firewall* and managed trough nessus (the client or frontend) running on one of the internal machines. When I was running a scan against 194.152.181.36 I observed several entries like

Has anyone encountered a situation where packets dropped by the newnotsyn chain can result in sporadic browsing problems, slowness, and even timeouts? I noticed that of the 3300 hits for newnotsyn in our current log (6 hours worth), over 2700 of them were to/from our proxy servers. And browsing through them, most *appear* to be otherwise valid packets from remote web servers that would have

I have a zone "rw" defined as tun0 in interfaces. From that zone, pings to zone "loc" succeed but pings to remote networks (On IPsec VPNs) are rejected in the all2all chain. From my point of view, these pings should be in the rw2cctc chain. (rw to cctc is ACCEPTed in policy.) I must have a hole in my config, where would it be? Thanks, A.