similar to: odd warning unlinking symlink on Windows

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "odd warning unlinking symlink on Windows"

2015 Nov 07
0
corrupt PACKAGES.gz?
Bill, thanks for reporting, this is currently true for all PACKAGES.gz files my autobuilder is creating, will investigate. Best, Uwe On 06.11.2015 18:54, William Dunlap wrote: > Is it just me, or did a corrupt PACKAGES.gz file get installed in the > bin/windows/contrib/3.2 directory of CRAN mirrors recently? gzfile() > complains about it and Cygwin's gzip cannot decompress it.
2015 Nov 06
2
corrupt PACKAGES.gz?
Is it just me, or did a corrupt PACKAGES.gz file get installed in the bin/windows/contrib/3.2 directory of CRAN mirrors recently? gzfile() complains about it and Cygwin's gzip cannot decompress it. I tried the following repos <- "https://cran.rstudio.com" v <- "3.2" pkgs.gz <- paste(sep="/", repos, "bin/windows/contrib", v,
2011 Sep 23
1
should dir(all=TRUE) return "." and ".."?
dir(all=TRUE) returns the file names "." and ".." while dir(recursive=TRUE, all=TRUE, include.dirs=TRUE) does not. I always filter out the "." and ".." entries and was wondering if anyone would mind if dir(all=TRUE) just omitted them? It might make recursive file operations like cleaning out a directory safer, as unlink(recursive=TRUE, dir(all=TRUE,
2016 Oct 31
0
[PATCH 4/4] rpm: mageia: prefer dnf over urpmi
Mageia introduced dnf as alternative package manager for the next version 6, with the possibility to replace urpmi as primary in the future. As such, prefer dnf over urpmi+fakeroot to download rpm packages. Thanks to Neal Gompa for his heads-up. --- README | 3 +-- src/rpm.ml | 8 +++++--- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/README b/README index 79fcfd8..679bf70
2019 Feb 14
1
Proposed function file.backup
Dear R Core: In the kutils package, I wrote a function that is so handy that I would like to ask you put it in R itself. file.backup() will look at a file, find its last modification time, and create a new backup with a name that appends YYYYMMDD-HHMM to the file name. So now, whenever I worry that running write.csv or saving a graph might destroy something valuable, I use an idiom like fn
2003 Dec 20
1
rsync "hang"
Hello rsync list, I am running a Solaris 8 system and have rsync 1.6.2 protocal 14 installed. We have updated (wed 17-dec) to the latest Solaris 8 recommended patch set. When performing an rsync of two local UFS partitions rsync "hung", never completed, didn't exit. What I forced an exit via kill signal core dumped. Config of disks is that 1) Mirror by Solistice Disksuite rsync to
2014 Nov 24
0
[PATCH] rpm: isolate the "packages as NA RPM list" code
Just code motion, no functional change. --- src/rpm.ml | 25 ++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/rpm.ml b/src/rpm.ml index ce803e1..771022e 100644 --- a/src/rpm.ml +++ b/src/rpm.ml @@ -288,11 +288,7 @@ let rec fedora_download_all_packages pkgs dir = * Use name.arch so it can download any version but only the specific *
2018 Jul 06
0
NEWS vs. inst/NEWS
'Writing R Extensions', section 1.1.5, in the part about a package's 'inst' directory, says that if NEW is in both the top level and in the inst directory, the in inst will be installed: Note that with the exceptions of INDEX, LICENSE/LICENCE and NEWS, information files at the top level of the package will *not* be installed and so not be known to users of Windows and macOS
2015 Feb 27
0
Native characterset is wrong for unicode builds for Windows
On 27/02/2015 2:31 AM, maillist at tlink.de wrote: > Am 27.02.2015 um 03:13 schrieb Duncan Murdoch: >> On 26/02/2015 6:34 PM, maillist at tlink.de wrote: >>>> On 26/02/2015 3:09 PM, maillist at tlink.de wrote: >>>>> When I send some outlandish characters through enc2native (or format) in >>>>> R 3.1.2 on Ubuntu trusty it works quite well:
2016 Jun 17
0
[PATCH net-next V2] tun: introduce tx skb ring
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 04:38:17PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > We used to queue tx packets in sk_receive_queue, this is less > efficient since it requires spinlocks to synchronize between producer > and consumer. > > This patch tries to address this by: > > - introduce a new mode which will be only enabled with IFF_TX_ARRAY > set and switch from sk_receive_queue to a
2016 Jun 30
0
[PATCH net-next V3 6/6] tun: switch to use skb array for tx
We used to queue tx packets in sk_receive_queue, this is less efficient since it requires spinlocks to synchronize between producer and consumer. This patch tries to address this by: - switch from sk_receive_queue to a skb_array, and resize it when tx_queue_len was changed. - introduce a new proto_ops peek_len which was used for peeking the skb length. - implement a tun version of peek_len
2016 Jun 15
7
[PATCH net-next V2] tun: introduce tx skb ring
We used to queue tx packets in sk_receive_queue, this is less efficient since it requires spinlocks to synchronize between producer and consumer. This patch tries to address this by: - introduce a new mode which will be only enabled with IFF_TX_ARRAY set and switch from sk_receive_queue to a fixed size of skb array with 256 entries in this mode. - introduce a new proto_ops peek_len which was
2016 Jun 15
7
[PATCH net-next V2] tun: introduce tx skb ring
We used to queue tx packets in sk_receive_queue, this is less efficient since it requires spinlocks to synchronize between producer and consumer. This patch tries to address this by: - introduce a new mode which will be only enabled with IFF_TX_ARRAY set and switch from sk_receive_queue to a fixed size of skb array with 256 entries in this mode. - introduce a new proto_ops peek_len which was
2016 Dec 30
0
[PATCH net-next V3 3/3] tun: rx batching
We can only process 1 packet at one time during sendmsg(). This often lead bad cache utilization under heavy load. So this patch tries to do some batching during rx before submitting them to host network stack. This is done through accepting MSG_MORE as a hint from sendmsg() caller, if it was set, batch the packet temporarily in a linked list and submit them all once MSG_MORE were cleared. Tests
2004 Sep 17
0
[Bug 1791] New: using --delete with single directory mirroring doesn't delete files
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1791 Summary: using --delete with single directory mirroring doesn't delete files Product: rsync Version: 2.6.3 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org
2016 Dec 28
0
[PATCH net-next V2 3/3] tun: rx batching
We can only process 1 packet at one time during sendmsg(). This often lead bad cache utilization under heavy load. So this patch tries to do some batching during rx before submitting them to host network stack. This is done through accepting MSG_MORE as a hint from sendmsg() caller, if it was set, batch the packet temporarily in a linked list and submit them all once MSG_MORE were cleared. Tests
2017 Jan 18
0
[PATCH net-next V5 3/3] tun: rx batching
We can only process 1 packet at one time during sendmsg(). This often lead bad cache utilization under heavy load. So this patch tries to do some batching during rx before submitting them to host network stack. This is done through accepting MSG_MORE as a hint from sendmsg() caller, if it was set, batch the packet temporarily in a linked list and submit them all once MSG_MORE were cleared. Tests
2017 Jan 06
0
[PATCH V4 net-next 3/3] tun: rx batching
We can only process 1 packet at one time during sendmsg(). This often lead bad cache utilization under heavy load. So this patch tries to do some batching during rx before submitting them to host network stack. This is done through accepting MSG_MORE as a hint from sendmsg() caller, if it was set, batch the packet temporarily in a linked list and submit them all once MSG_MORE were cleared. Tests
2018 Sep 06
1
[PATCH net-next 01/11] net: sock: introduce SOCK_XDP
On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 12:05:16PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > This patch introduces a new sock flag - SOCK_XDP. This will be used > for notifying the upper layer that XDP program is attached on the > lower socket, and requires for extra headroom. > > TUN will be the first user. > > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> In fact vhost is the 1st user,
2017 Jan 06
2
[PATCH V4 net-next 3/3] tun: rx batching
On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 10:13:17AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > We can only process 1 packet at one time during sendmsg(). This often > lead bad cache utilization under heavy load. So this patch tries to do > some batching during rx before submitting them to host network > stack. This is done through accepting MSG_MORE as a hint from > sendmsg() caller, if it was set, batch the packet