similar to: Can I pass PPTP packets thru 2 firewalls?

Hello, Please see the following picture: http://www.wilson-kwok.com/pptp.jpg I used one to one NAT from 210.0.0.1 to 192.168.0.2 for web server, and then use port forwarding from 210.0.0.1 to 192.168.0.3 for pptp server, but I cannot connect from my home to pptp server. Here is the nat file: 210.0.0.1 eth0:2 192.168.0.2 Here is the rules

The problem scenario I describe was reported previously in the Shorewall lists but its resolution does not seem to have made it into the lists. Scenario: Windows XP client seeking to establish a VPN connection to a Windows 2003 Server located behind a Shorewall firewall (running on Mandrake kernel 2.4.22-37mdk). The connection cannot be made, the client reports error code 721. Discussion:

Hi, I need to locate a Asterisk server and a PoE-enabled switch on someone's desk. I've seen this Netgear ProSafe FS108P with 4 10/100 and 4 10/100 w/PoE ports silent enough ? Any recommendation ? Regards -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20090123/4f76aef9/attachment.htm

Hi, For a very basic setup it would work, but I would suggest POE at a minimum, and vlan support if possible. Gigabit uplinks, 10/100 for the poe ports http://www.amazon.com/NETGEAR-ProSAFE-M4100-D10-POE-Ethernet-Managed/dp/B00AUEYX0Y/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1424462577&sr=8-3&keywords=netgear+poe and Gigabit all ports

Hello list, I am doing some work for a non profit group. As part of this, I am going to be putting in a 30 handset Asterisk solution. We are trying to keep the costs down as much as possible, as this job includes cabling, I am looking at POE solutions. On the switch side, I am considering something like some Netgear ProSafe FS726TP 24 port switches, or maybe the equivalent Linksys SRW224MP 24

On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 13:05:56 -0700, Harry McGregor wrote: > For a very basic setup it would work, but I would suggest POE at a > minimum, and vlan support if possible. > > Gigabit uplinks, 10/100 for the poe ports > > http://www.amazon.com/NETGEAR-ProSAFE-M4100-D10-POE-Ethernet-Managed/dp/ B00AUEYX0Y/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1424462577&sr=8-3&keywords=netgear+poe

on i have a small question we have a linux box with a windows 2003 server well we natted all the ports and mail is working remote desktop is working web is working the only thing that does not work is vpn how can i foward vpn traffic to this server i checked the site and searched for foward vpn and got nothen can somone please enlight me where to start Marshal McInnis Tech / Web

Hello,   I setup a PPTP service on a Windows 2003 in LAN. Shorewall used NAT and macro and rules, for example:   nat:   1.1.1.1   eth2:11         172.16.1.246 macro.VPN:   PARAM   -       -       tcp     1723 PARAM   -       -       47 rules:   VPN/ACCEPT       net             dmz:172.16.1.246   or don''t use macro   DNAT            net             loc:172.16.1.246 tcp 1723       -

Hello, I''m trying to setup DNAT to forward to a PPTP Server behind Shorewall. I setup the PPTP rules per your documentation with tcp port 1723 and Protocol 47 DNAT to my PPTP Server in the local zone. Looking at the logs it is dropping the connection going to port 1723. It is also dropping UDP port 1701, don''t know if it is of any significance. I looked at FAQ 1a and b and the

I'm using shorewall 3.0.4 with ubuntu dapper. I've compiled the kernel with the option CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_CACHED=n. I had a trouble with, pptp connection, I'm trying to connect a using microsoft vpn a vpn server out of my lan, and don't work. My files <providers> ADSL1 1 1 main eth1.600 10.190.1.1 track,balance eth0 ADSL1 2 2 main eth1.601 10.190.2.1

Hi all, I´m running a server that frecuently needs to open a pptp session with a remote server outside my Company. This server is running behind a Shorewall firewall and I don´t find information in Shorewall web page because there is no information in the link http://www.shorewall.net/PPTP.htm#ClientsBehind Nowadays I can connect this server with the remote one but te session is closed after

I have two/three PPTP servers on my network and each one of them are on their own subnet and I want to be able to send traffic to each and everyone. My rules file entry is as follows DNAT net loc:1.1.1.1 tcp 1723 DNAT net loc:1.1.1.1 47 and DNAT net loc:2.2.2.2 tcp 1723 DNAT net loc:2.2.2.2 47 however all the traffic only goes to 1.1.1.1 because its the first DNAT entry. I tried the

Hi friends, I need help. I''ve PPTP Server running behind Shorewall. The PPTP server is working OK in my LAN, but I want to connect outside and It isn''t working. I''ve configurate shorewall like http://www.shorewall.net/PPTP.htm. I add only this lines in my rules DNAT net loc:165.182.15.15 tcp 1723 - IPext DNAT net loc:165.182.15.15 47 - - IPext It isn''t

Hi all! I''ve set up a Linux box with shorewall doing proxy arp as per http://www.shorewall.net/shorewall_setup_guide.htm#ProxyARP the 5.2 (non routed) example. Everything is working great except for one thing, and that leads me to my question: is there a conflict between proxy arp and pptp? I''ve set the apropriate ACCEPT rules to allow tcp port 1723 and protocol 47 to the host

Hello ppl, I have an application that gets updates via a network path for example \\192.168.40.100\ is the update-server in WINE i can only make the updates if I mount via samba the available share z:/ -> is the \\192.168.40.100 And I must configure the server to show updates in Z: so that the wine clients can make the updates. To update the windows clients I change the config again to

Pardon, this might be off-topic. I'm reading: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_switch For a setup of ~5 agents, would I be wrong in thinking that a generic 16 port unmanaged switch would fit the bill? The first model to come up for me in an Amazon search is: http://support.netgear.com/product/fs116 Is this a reasonable choice? Would I be wrong in thinking that most any Fast

Good Morning Everyone, I have a server that runs Shorewall/Samba/PPTP (Poptop). When we try to connect to the PPTP server from outside of the company, the Windows XP pro client can establish the connection. We can then ping the server and the clients behind the server without any problem, but the issue becomes that we cannot map to any of the shares on the samba server or to any client for that

I have set up a VPN over PPTP on a CentOS server using the DKMS module rpm dkms-0-2.0.6-3.el4 from http://centos.karan.org/el4/extras/stable/i386/RPMS/repodata/repovie w/dkms-0-2.0.6-3.el4.kb.html and kernel_ppp_mppe-0.0.5-2dkms.noarch.rpm at http://pptpclient.sourceforge.net/howto-fedora- core-3.phtml. I have configured the pptpd server on Centos4 to use MS_CHAPv2, 128bit encryption and

In my lab I successfully got everything working running our secured Active Directory and Fedora Core 3. In our AD we have secured settings like refusing NTLMv2, require LDAP signing, SMB signing and more. In the lab we have the following rpm's: krb5-workstation-1.3.4.7 samba-3.0.8.0.pre1.3 openldap-2.2.13-2 But now we're implementing this in production and there we're running Red Hat

What I''m doing: I have Shorewall on a SuSE 9.0 machine, which is the firewall/router on the network. External interface is eth0 172.16.1.1, internal interface is eth1 10.40.1.1. (I used the Two-interface Linux System Quickstart Guide). All works well with that configuration. I also use PPPD for dial-in clients, and have two modems for incoming calls. Recently I added VPN interface