similar to: getParseData() for installed packages

On 10.03.2016 15:49, Duncan Murdoch wrote: > On 10/03/2016 8:27 AM, Kirill M?ller wrote: >> I can't seem to reliably obtain parse data via getParseData() for >> functions from installed packages. The parse data seems to be available >> only for the *last* file in the package. >> >> See [1] for a small example package with just two functions f and g in >>

As Michael guessed my main use cases was code analysis. A concrete example where this would help is with my test code coverage tool covr. There is currently a bug when tracking coverage for if / else statements when the clauses do not contain brackets (https://github.com/jimhester/covr/issues/39). Because only one source reference is generated in this case (because it is parsed as a single

Probably need a generic tree based on "ParseNode" objects that associate the line information with the symbol (for leaf nodes). As Duncan notes, it should be possible to gather that from the table. But it would be nice if there was an "expr" column in the parse data column in addition to "text". It would contain the parsed object. Otherwise, to use the table, one is

On 10/03/2016 9:53 AM, Kirill M?ller wrote: > > On 10.03.2016 15:49, Duncan Murdoch wrote: > > On 10/03/2016 8:27 AM, Kirill M?ller wrote: > >> I can't seem to reliably obtain parse data via getParseData() for > >> functions from installed packages. The parse data seems to be available > >> only for the *last* file in the package. > >> >

Hi all, I would like to install a trace function that gets executed whenever *any* R function is called. In Python, for example, this functionality is provided by the `sys.settrace` function. I am not aware of any public interface, at the R or C level, that can accomplish this. The `trace` function is inadequate because it does not support nested functions. The `Rprof` function provides only

Hi, The imaginary unit is gone in the 'text' column in the returned data frame from getParseData(), e.g. in the example below, perhaps the text should be 1i instead of 1: > p=parse(text='1i') > getParseData(p) line1 col1 line2 col2 id parent token terminal text 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 NUM_CONST TRUE 1 2 1 1 1 2 2 0 expr

Hi, With R-3.1.0 I get: > getParseData(parse(text = "{1}", keep.source = TRUE)) line1 col1 line2 col2 id parent token terminal text 7 1 1 1 3 7 9 expr FALSE 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 '{' TRUE { 2 1 2 1 2 2 3 NUM_CONST TRUE 1 3 1 2 1 2 3 5 expr FALSE 4 1 3 1

Hi, The text column for '->' becomes '<-' in the data frame returned by getParseData(): > getParseData(parse(text='1->x')) line1 col1 line2 col2 id parent token terminal text 7 1 1 1 4 7 0 expr FALSE 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 NUM_CONST TRUE 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 7 expr FALSE 3

Hi All; This problem has come about from trying to learn some of the review practices recommend by rOpensci. One of them is to use the package goodpractice. After installing goodpractice, it kept failing on my own packages which are under development, and I was concerned something was funny in my own , so I have a fork of the package rerddap, and I tested goodpractice on that. I get the

Hi I haven't found a way to produce a tabulation from factor data with NA values using xtabs. Please find a minimal example below, it's also on R-pubs [1]. Tested with R 3.1.2 and R-devel r67720. It doesn't seem to be documented explicitly that it's not supported. From reading the code [2] it looks like the relevant call to table() doesn't set the "useNA"

withr:::set_makevars() can give that error if the makefile named by the 'old_path' argument (default "~/.R/Makevars) contains more than one definition of a variable of the form 'name=value'. You can see what file it is reading and its contents by using the trace() function: trace(withr:::set_makevars, quote({ cat(old_path, "\n"); writeLines(paste0(" ",

Hi I'd like to suggest to make R more informative when a user updates a package A where there's at least one package B that has "LinkingTo: A" in its description. To illustrate the problem, assume package A is updated so that its C/C++ header interface (in inst/include) is changed. For package B to pick up these changes, we need to reinstall package A. In extreme cases, if

On 06.06.2017 10:07, Martin Maechler wrote: >>>>>> Kirill M?ller <kirill.mueller at ivt.baug.ethz.ch> >>>>>> on Mon, 5 Jun 2017 17:30:20 +0200 writes: > > Hi I've noted a minor inconsistency in the documentation: > > Current R-exts reads > > > s = PROTECT_WITH_INDEX(eval(OS->R_fcall, OS->R_env), &ipx);

Dear list For my work, it would be helpful if rpart worked seamlessly with an empty model: library(rpart); rpart(formula=y~0, data=data.frame(y=factor(1:10))) Currently, an unrelated error (originating from na.rpart) is thrown. At some point in the near future, I'd like to release a package to CRAN which uses rpart and relies on that functionality. I have prepared a patch (minor

Hi Accesses the $new method for a class defined in a package fails if the methods package is not loaded. I have created a test package with the following single code file: newTest <- function() { cl <- get("someClass") cl$new } someClass <- setRefClass("someClass") (This is similar to code actually used in the testthat package.) If methods is not loaded,

Hi, I'm trying to make sense of the output of getParseData(). The "parent" column is supposed to refer to the "id" of the parent of the given item, but there are numbers in the parent column that do not exist in the id column. Example: > p <- parse(text="f<-function(){if(TRUE)1 else 2}") > df <- getParseData(p) > df line1 col1 line2 col2 id

>>>>> Kirill M?ller <kirill.mueller at ivt.baug.ethz.ch> >>>>> on Thu, 8 Jun 2017 12:55:26 +0200 writes: > On 06.06.2017 22:14, Kirill M?ller wrote: >> >> >> On 06.06.2017 10:07, Martin Maechler wrote: >>>>>>>> Kirill M?ller <kirill.mueller at ivt.baug.ethz.ch> on

I would like to map the parsed tokens obtained from utils::getParseData() to the parse tree and elements obtained by base::parse(). It looks like back when this code was in the parser package the parse() function annotated the elements in the tree with their id, which would allow you to perform this mapping. However when the code was included in R this functionality was removed. ?getParseData

I have two use cases in mind: 1) Code indexing/searching, where the table gets me almost all of the way there, except I ask for all of the text (including the calls) and then parse that, because it's nice to get back an actual code object when you are searching code (in addition to where the code lives). The extra parsing step is just a minor inconvenience. 2) Code analysis, which I'm

I don't know, maybe it would make sense to keep the whole expression, that's the text of the tag after all. Also, if we don't keep the whole expression, then it is not a valid string literal any more, because it does not have quoting. I can try to look into a patch. This is for 4.1 I believe, so in some sense it is not urgent? Gabor On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 3:31 PM <luke-tierney