similar to: Help tcp proxy bridge

good day, i am trying to create domain via virDomainDefineXML. and my program hanging, also i failed to caonnect to libvirt daemon with virt-manager after this, only killing libvirtd via SIGKILL and restarting it solveing hang (i mean after restart i able to connect with virt-manager), i using following domain xml <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <domain

В письме от Среда, 19-июн-2013 09:35:27 пользователь Michal Privoznik написал: > On 18.06.2013 22:21, Александр wrote: > > В письме от Вторник, 18-июн-2013 12:10:41 пользователь Michal Privoznik > > > > написал: > >> On 18.06.2013 07:14, Александр wrote: > >>> good day, i am trying to create domain via virDomainDefineXML. and my > >>> program

В письме от Вторник, 18-июн-2013 12:10:41 пользователь Michal Privoznik написал: > On 18.06.2013 07:14, Александр wrote: > > good day, i am trying to create domain via virDomainDefineXML. and my > > program hanging, also i failed to caonnect to libvirt daemon with > > virt-manager after this, only killing libvirtd via SIGKILL and restarting > > it solveing hang (i mean

On 20.06.2013 12:56, Alexandr wrote: > On 20.06.2013 10:44, Michal Privoznik wrote: >> On 20.06.2013 09:40, Александр wrote: >>> В письме от Четверг, 20-июн-2013 09:15:14 Вы написали: >>>> On 19.06.2013 21:24, Александр wrote: >>>>> В письме от Среда, 19-июн-2013 09:35:27 пользователь Michal Privoznik >>> написал: >>>>>> On

Hi! I want to forward the port 3389 from the domU to the virtual server with ip address 192.168.122.77 with not success... I tried a lot of iptables rules with no luck so far. Is this possible? I take a look at other post and I don''t found an answer. By example: /sbin/iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -i xenbr0 --dport 3389 -j DNAT --to 192.168.122.77:3389 the virtual nic for the

dear all i have a web server on centos 4.6. i have configured one more back up Webserver with the same configuration as the same on the primary web server Now how to configure this servers for fault tolerance. that is. if one server gets down the other should automatically become up. Please any one help me out how to configure the above. i am new to Linux ... Regards, Gopinath M Signal

Hello list, Here is a setup of my network: eth0 <-> router1 <-> eth2 --- wifi --- eth2 <-> router2 <-> eth0 | | eth1 eth1 Router1: eth0 - Internet connection eth1 - Local network (network 10.1.1.0/24) eth2 - Wireless AP (network 10.1.10.0/24) Router2: eth0 - Internet

Restarting libvirtd doesn't change the situation. But looking into the logs I see the following: - Last lines in /var/log/libvirt/libvirtd.log: 2016-07-05 13:26:42.792+0000: 24552: warning : qemuProcessKill:4419 : Timed out waiting after SIGKILL to process 48301 2016-07-05 13:26:42.792+0000: 24552: error : qemuDomainDestroyFlags:2120 : operation failed: failed to kill qemu process with

Dear Mongrel users, I would like to use Mongrel to introduce RoR on an existing Apache/PHP server. The server serves several domains, set up as virtual hosts. The idea is to install a Rails application to be used in addition to the existing configuration. Example: www.domain1.com/index.php -> Via Apache www.domain1.com/appname/controller/action -> RoR application I am at a loss how to do

Hello, I have a Samba/OpenLDAP domain (PDB+BDC) and a member Samba server hosting homes and profiles which is identifying users with nss_ldap and is issuing some strange ldap searches. I have these messages in my slapd logs: conn=14143 op=2 SRCH base="ou=XXX" scope=1 deref=0 filter="(&(objectClass=posixAccount)(uid=domain\5Cuser))" conn=14143 op=2 SRCH attr=uid

On 15 January 2016 at 08:48, Alex Bligh <alex at alex.org.uk> wrote: > > The socket option is enabled *after* connection establishment, thus > > doesn't protect against SYN floods. This is because server doesn't > > know (in userspace) what the address of the peer is until they > > connect. Again because signed addresses. > So could they exchange a secret

What is the best way to temporarily setup a port relay. I'm trying to diagnose a problem with Cisco's latest VPN client and need to determine if the problem is port number related. e.g. VPN client---------23-(Linux box to relay port)-------xx-(Telnet server) (Keep in mind this is temporary and for debugging purposes) Thanks, Frank M. Ramaekers Jr. Systems Programmer

My TCP clients connect to box A. I need to forward those connections to a server on box B, such that the original client IPs are visible to the server on B. Each box has two Ethernet ports. One port on each box is connected to WAN, and they are cross-connected in a LAN via remaining ports: ------------------- ------------------- WAN -- |eth0 Box A eth1|---LAN---|eth1 Box

hello All I am reading information about VoIP technology For that i am concentrating on SIP (Session Initiation Protocol) and RTP (Real Time Transport Protocol). I am interested in implementing RTP over TCP I found that there are some disadvantages of TCP, some are 1) TCP doesn't support multicasting. 2) Through TCP is reliable, it heavily depends on retransmission of lost or

I am trying to get Samba 3.4.0 (on an Ubuntu 9.10 box) set up as a file server for my home. The router is 10.1.10.1; the Ubuntu box ("chronicles") is 10.1.10.2; the OS X box I'm using for testing purposes ("job") is 10.1.10.3. From job, I can see ports 139 and 445 on chronicles are open. Neither box has 'chronicles' or 'job' listed in its /etc/hosts file.

What would be the best way to sort relocation entries before they are written out in ELFObjectWriter::WriteRelocationsFragment? According to the Mips ABI documents I have, there are certain restrictions on the order relocations appear in the table (e.g. R_MIPS_HI16 and R_MIPS_GOT16 must be followed immediately by a R_MIPS_LO16). When I enable post RA scheduling, some of the restrictions are

Hi there, I''m still trying to wrap my head around when to use a stub and a mock. If I understand this right, I should be using a ''mock'' when imitating an object, but not its behavior. I should be using a stub when I want to imitate the behavior of an object. Does that sound about right? With that said, I''m struggling a little trying to spec out this instance

Hi Everyone, I was setting up Lighty+Fcgi on our server for last *couple* ( read zillion ) of hours. I had posted my problems in my previous email. But all in vain.. So, for time being, I switched to Mongrel. And the performance seemed quite good. This is the first time ever I''m using mongrel ( Awesome stuff ZedShaw..Thanks! ). I''m wondering if there are many people around

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 After upgrading from 3.0.2 to 3.0.3 in a Windows 2000 Native Domain environment, 9x clients can't connect and wbinfo -t doesn't work: bash-2.05a# wbinfo -t checking the trust secret via RPC calls failed error code was NT_STATUS_PIPE_NOT_AVAILABLE (0xc00000ac) Could not check secret Downgrading to 3.0.2 fixes this. I can get log files, but

I''d like to use Mongrel_cluster with SSL on a green-field application (it can be configured however is best - initially, "ease of setup" is important, but then soon after will be scaling and response time). I''ve read a lot of emails on this topic, and checked out the Mongrel pages, etc, but I''m left with this question of what is recommended: For a