Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "Fwd: [musl] strptime() question"
2016 Feb 06
1
Fwd: [musl] strptime() question
It is setting TZ and using tzset(). R is not multi-threaded so it is safe.
Simon figure out the important settings from the config.log and
config.h files on a musl system:
/* #undef USE_INTERNAL_MKTIME */
#define HAVE_TM_GMTOFF 1
#define HAVE_TM_ZONE 1
Does this help anyone debug the issue? Simon just went on vacation.
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 7:32 PM, Rich Felker <dalias at libc.org>
2016 Feb 01
1
More problems with building R on a musl platform
Here is tests/reg-tests-1c.Rout.fail -
http://pastebin.com/raw/3QVDUBwT
About the libm, I don't know which one R uses.
musl has its on libm. http://git.musl-libc.org/cgit/musl/tree/src/math
I think I also have openlibm installed, but I don't think that's used.
Any more information I can give to help debug this?
Thanks.
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 3:49 PM, Martin Maechler
<maechler
2016 Feb 01
3
Wrong config check for __libc_stack_end
@Simon. Here's what I did.
I checked out R revision 70059.
Ran export r_cv_libc_stack_end=no. (otherwise it would give that error
we talked about before)
Ran ./configure --without-recommended-packages. (otherwise it would
complain of not finding ./src/library/Recommended/MASS_*.tar.gz)
Ran make.
Ran make check. Log is here - http://pastebin.com/raw/cGJgqB8p
What do you think? Is there
2016 Feb 01
3
Wrong config check for __libc_stack_end
Here's what I did.
svn checkout https://svn.r-project.org/R/trunk/
cd ./trunk
aclocal -I m4 && autoconf
tools/rsync-recommended
cd ..
mkdir build
cd build
../trunk/configure
make
make check
On make check it gives an error.
Here's the log.
http://pastebin.com/raw/1qfjqQY2
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 1:53 PM, Simon Urbanek
<simon.urbanek at r-project.org> wrote:
>
> On Feb
2016 Feb 01
3
Wrong config check for __libc_stack_end
>>>>> Alba Pompeo <albapompeo at gmail.com>
>>>>> on Fri, 29 Jan 2016 08:23:26 -0200 writes:
> Here is my log from 'make check' using an Intel i5 64-bit
> processor - http://pastebin.com/raw/N6SYAuFX Here is
> Isaac's log from 'make check' using an Intel Atom 32-bit
> processor -
2016 Feb 04
0
Fwd: [musl] strptime() question
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 04:35:22PM -0200, Alba Pompeo wrote:
> I forwarded our talk on musl mailing list to R mailing list.
> I got this response.
> Does it help?
> Also, what do you think about making a new email that's sent to both
> musl and R mailing list, that way devs from both projects can
> communicate? It's a tad inefficient for me to keep forwarding messages
2016 Jan 28
2
Abuse of a private glibc symbol in R 3.2.3
Hello, developers of R.
I have been unsuccessfully trying to build R on a musl libc system for
the last days.
./configure works, but make fails. The command that errors out is here
- http://pastebin.com/raw/UwFRsiqT
It was brought to my attention that this is a (very longstanding)
abuse of a private
glibc symbol in R.
In R 3.2.3, it seems that configure is trying to test for it on Linux.
It
2016 Feb 01
0
More problems with building R on a musl platform
>>>>> Alba Pompeo <albapompeo at gmail.com>
>>>>> on Mon, 1 Feb 2016 15:33:11 -0200 writes:
> Here's what I did.
> svn checkout https://svn.r-project.org/R/trunk/
> cd ./trunk
> aclocal -I m4 && autoconf
> tools/rsync-recommended
> cd ..
> mkdir build
> cd build
> ../trunk/configure
2016 Feb 01
0
Wrong config check for __libc_stack_end
On Feb 1, 2016, at 9:56 AM, Alba Pompeo <albapompeo at gmail.com> wrote:
> @Simon. Here's what I did.
> I checked out R revision 70059.
> Ran export r_cv_libc_stack_end=no. (otherwise it would give that error
> we talked about before)
No, the whole point was to test this behavior. I see that the fix is in configure.ac but not configure so you'll need to run something
2016 Feb 01
0
Wrong config check for __libc_stack_end
On Feb 1, 2016, at 4:16 AM, Martin Maechler <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch> wrote:
>>>>>> Alba Pompeo <albapompeo at gmail.com>
>>>>>> on Fri, 29 Jan 2016 08:23:26 -0200 writes:
>
>> Here is my log from 'make check' using an Intel i5 64-bit
>> processor - http://pastebin.com/raw/N6SYAuFX Here is
>> Isaac's log
2007 Jan 08
1
Does strptime(...,tz="GMT") do anything?
Hi All
In trying to correlate some tide gauge data I need to deal with varying
timezones. From the documentation on strptime, it seemed that the tz
variable might have some effect on the conversion, but I'm not seeing an
effect.
> strptime("20061201 1:02 PST",format="%Y%m%d %H:%M",tz="PST")+0
[1] "2006-12-01 01:02:00 EST"
>
2004 Aug 09
1
Time zones
I am analysing some data collected over a number of months from Allentown,
PA, which is just north of Philadelphia. I am using as.POSIXct for dates
and times, and I need to get the timezone specification correct.
Going on the documentation for DateTimeClasses, I believe one way to
specify the correct time zone is
tz="EST5EDT"
I would be grateful for any advice on this. I ask
2005 Aug 31
1
So-called 'bug' reports PR#8102 and PR#8103
Neither of these have reached me on R-devel (and only PR#8103 is on the
archive), and they seem to be the same error although neither mentions the
other. That's 'odd', to quote one of them.
"EDT" is not a valid POSIX timezone (but, say, EST5EDT is). R's docs are
quite clear that what happens with invalid inputs is system-specific.
(Windows seems often to run home
2016 Jan 29
0
Abuse of a private glibc symbol in R 3.2.3
Here is my log from 'make check' using an Intel i5 64-bit processor -
http://pastebin.com/raw/N6SYAuFX
Here is Isaac's log from 'make check' using an Intel Atom 32-bit
processor - http://pastebin.com/raw/sey6DEk9
We are both on Alpine Linux, which uses the musl libc. http://www.musl-libc.org/
Thank you very much.
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 9:54 AM, Alba Pompeo <albapompeo
2012 Jul 09
1
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] ELLCC and musl
> ELLCC (http://ellcc.org), my clang/LLVM based cross development tool chain for
> ARM, Microblaze, Mips, Power PC, and X86, now incorporates musl
> (http://www.etalabs.net/musl) as its standard C library for Linux. musl is a
> MIT licensed, highly POSIX compliant library offering high performance and a
> small foot print. I spent several weeks evaluating musl before deciding to use
2016 Dec 02
2
Failed to configure LLVM for use with Musl
I want to build LLVM-based toolchain with Musl, I have LLVM sources with clang and lld (under `tools` directory) and libunwind, compiler-rt, libcxx and libcxxabi (under `projects` directory). All are the latest versions cloned from GitHub mirror, branch `master`.
I'm trying to configure with the following options:
CLANG_DEFAULT_CXX_STDLIB = libc++
CLANG_DEFAULT_RTLIB = compiler-rt
2019 Mar 25
2
Trying to create a pure LLVM toolchain on musl based distribution
Le 25/03/2019 à 14:41, Peter Smith a écrit :
> Hello David,
>
> I don't know much about the specifics of Musl, so I'm responding generally.
>
> As I understand it, clang expects to find the compiler-rt libraries
> relative to the resource directory, which you can find out the
> location of with clang --print-resource-dir . By default it is
> lib/clang/9.0.0
2017 Jun 04
2
LLVM compilation problem with musl
I'm trying to compile LLVM with musl libc library. The compilation process fails on the following:
x86_64-linux-musl-g++ -DGTEST_HAS_RTTI=0 -DLLVM_BUILD_GLOBAL_ISEL -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -Ilib/Support -I../lib/Support -Iinclude -I../include -fPIC -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -Werror=date-time -std=c++11 -Wall -W -Wno-unused-parameter
2016 Dec 09
4
Strange clang behavior when compiled against musl
I have managed to compile llvm and clang against musl, but it behaves really strange:
At first I tried to launch the compiler with musl dynamic loader:
$ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/path/to/musl/lib /path/to/musl/lib/ld-musl-x86_64.so.1 /path/to/llvm/bin/clang -v
clang version 4.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm-mirror/clang 40adebeca0f99006d407508653c2cbd270a1a51c) (https://github.com/llvm-mirror/llvm
2019 Mar 25
3
Trying to create a pure LLVM toolchain on musl based distribution
Hello,
I'm trying to create a pure LLVM toolchain (that will not depend on GNU
and produce GNU-free code too) on a musl based distribution.
For now, I use gcc to bootstrap and build all LLVM components. I do it
individually because I was running out of space and memory trying to
build all using LLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS. Also, I don't want to create a
all-in-one package. Then, once