similar to: Fwd: [musl] strptime() question

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "Fwd: [musl] strptime() question"

2016 Feb 06
1
Fwd: [musl] strptime() question
It is setting TZ and using tzset(). R is not multi-threaded so it is safe. Simon figure out the important settings from the config.log and config.h files on a musl system: /* #undef USE_INTERNAL_MKTIME */ #define HAVE_TM_GMTOFF 1 #define HAVE_TM_ZONE 1 Does this help anyone debug the issue? Simon just went on vacation. On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 7:32 PM, Rich Felker <dalias at libc.org>
2016 Feb 01
1
More problems with building R on a musl platform
Here is tests/reg-tests-1c.Rout.fail - http://pastebin.com/raw/3QVDUBwT About the libm, I don't know which one R uses. musl has its on libm. http://git.musl-libc.org/cgit/musl/tree/src/math I think I also have openlibm installed, but I don't think that's used. Any more information I can give to help debug this? Thanks. On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 3:49 PM, Martin Maechler <maechler
2016 Feb 01
3
Wrong config check for __libc_stack_end
@Simon. Here's what I did. I checked out R revision 70059. Ran export r_cv_libc_stack_end=no. (otherwise it would give that error we talked about before) Ran ./configure --without-recommended-packages. (otherwise it would complain of not finding ./src/library/Recommended/MASS_*.tar.gz) Ran make. Ran make check. Log is here - http://pastebin.com/raw/cGJgqB8p What do you think? Is there
2016 Feb 01
3
Wrong config check for __libc_stack_end
Here's what I did. svn checkout https://svn.r-project.org/R/trunk/ cd ./trunk aclocal -I m4 && autoconf tools/rsync-recommended cd .. mkdir build cd build ../trunk/configure make make check On make check it gives an error. Here's the log. http://pastebin.com/raw/1qfjqQY2 On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 1:53 PM, Simon Urbanek <simon.urbanek at r-project.org> wrote: > > On Feb
2016 Feb 01
3
Wrong config check for __libc_stack_end
>>>>> Alba Pompeo <albapompeo at gmail.com> >>>>> on Fri, 29 Jan 2016 08:23:26 -0200 writes: > Here is my log from 'make check' using an Intel i5 64-bit > processor - http://pastebin.com/raw/N6SYAuFX Here is > Isaac's log from 'make check' using an Intel Atom 32-bit > processor -
2016 Feb 04
0
Fwd: [musl] strptime() question
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 04:35:22PM -0200, Alba Pompeo wrote: > I forwarded our talk on musl mailing list to R mailing list. > I got this response. > Does it help? > Also, what do you think about making a new email that's sent to both > musl and R mailing list, that way devs from both projects can > communicate? It's a tad inefficient for me to keep forwarding messages
2016 Jan 28
2
Abuse of a private glibc symbol in R 3.2.3
Hello, developers of R. I have been unsuccessfully trying to build R on a musl libc system for the last days. ./configure works, but make fails. The command that errors out is here - http://pastebin.com/raw/UwFRsiqT It was brought to my attention that this is a (very longstanding) abuse of a private glibc symbol in R. In R 3.2.3, it seems that configure is trying to test for it on Linux. It
2016 Feb 01
0
More problems with building R on a musl platform
>>>>> Alba Pompeo <albapompeo at gmail.com> >>>>> on Mon, 1 Feb 2016 15:33:11 -0200 writes: > Here's what I did. > svn checkout https://svn.r-project.org/R/trunk/ > cd ./trunk > aclocal -I m4 && autoconf > tools/rsync-recommended > cd .. > mkdir build > cd build > ../trunk/configure
2016 Feb 01
0
Wrong config check for __libc_stack_end
On Feb 1, 2016, at 9:56 AM, Alba Pompeo <albapompeo at gmail.com> wrote: > @Simon. Here's what I did. > I checked out R revision 70059. > Ran export r_cv_libc_stack_end=no. (otherwise it would give that error > we talked about before) No, the whole point was to test this behavior. I see that the fix is in configure.ac but not configure so you'll need to run something
2016 Feb 01
0
Wrong config check for __libc_stack_end
On Feb 1, 2016, at 4:16 AM, Martin Maechler <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch> wrote: >>>>>> Alba Pompeo <albapompeo at gmail.com> >>>>>> on Fri, 29 Jan 2016 08:23:26 -0200 writes: > >> Here is my log from 'make check' using an Intel i5 64-bit >> processor - http://pastebin.com/raw/N6SYAuFX Here is >> Isaac's log
2007 Jan 08
1
Does strptime(...,tz="GMT") do anything?
Hi All In trying to correlate some tide gauge data I need to deal with varying timezones. From the documentation on strptime, it seemed that the tz variable might have some effect on the conversion, but I'm not seeing an effect. > strptime("20061201 1:02 PST",format="%Y%m%d %H:%M",tz="PST")+0 [1] "2006-12-01 01:02:00 EST" >
2004 Aug 09
1
Time zones
I am analysing some data collected over a number of months from Allentown, PA, which is just north of Philadelphia. I am using as.POSIXct for dates and times, and I need to get the timezone specification correct. Going on the documentation for DateTimeClasses, I believe one way to specify the correct time zone is tz="EST5EDT" I would be grateful for any advice on this. I ask
2005 Aug 31
1
So-called 'bug' reports PR#8102 and PR#8103
Neither of these have reached me on R-devel (and only PR#8103 is on the archive), and they seem to be the same error although neither mentions the other. That's 'odd', to quote one of them. "EDT" is not a valid POSIX timezone (but, say, EST5EDT is). R's docs are quite clear that what happens with invalid inputs is system-specific. (Windows seems often to run home
2016 Jan 29
0
Abuse of a private glibc symbol in R 3.2.3
Here is my log from 'make check' using an Intel i5 64-bit processor - http://pastebin.com/raw/N6SYAuFX Here is Isaac's log from 'make check' using an Intel Atom 32-bit processor - http://pastebin.com/raw/sey6DEk9 We are both on Alpine Linux, which uses the musl libc. http://www.musl-libc.org/ Thank you very much. On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 9:54 AM, Alba Pompeo <albapompeo
2012 Jul 09
1
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] ELLCC and musl
> ELLCC (http://ellcc.org), my clang/LLVM based cross development tool chain for > ARM, Microblaze, Mips, Power PC, and X86, now incorporates musl > (http://www.etalabs.net/musl) as its standard C library for Linux. musl is a > MIT licensed, highly POSIX compliant library offering high performance and a > small foot print. I spent several weeks evaluating musl before deciding to use
2016 Dec 02
2
Failed to configure LLVM for use with Musl
I want to build LLVM-based toolchain with Musl, I have LLVM sources with clang and lld (under `tools` directory) and libunwind, compiler-rt, libcxx and libcxxabi (under `projects` directory). All are the latest versions cloned from GitHub mirror, branch `master`. I'm trying to configure with the following options: CLANG_DEFAULT_CXX_STDLIB = libc++ CLANG_DEFAULT_RTLIB = compiler-rt
2019 Mar 25
2
Trying to create a pure LLVM toolchain on musl based distribution
Le 25/03/2019 à 14:41, Peter Smith a écrit : > Hello David, > > I don't know much about the specifics of Musl, so I'm responding generally. > > As I understand it, clang expects to find the compiler-rt libraries > relative to the resource directory, which you can find out the > location of with clang --print-resource-dir . By default it is > lib/clang/9.0.0
2017 Jun 04
2
LLVM compilation problem with musl
I'm trying to compile LLVM with musl libc library. The compilation process fails on the following: x86_64-linux-musl-g++ -DGTEST_HAS_RTTI=0 -DLLVM_BUILD_GLOBAL_ISEL -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -Ilib/Support -I../lib/Support -Iinclude -I../include -fPIC -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -Werror=date-time -std=c++11 -Wall -W -Wno-unused-parameter
2016 Dec 09
4
Strange clang behavior when compiled against musl
I have managed to compile llvm and clang against musl, but it behaves really strange: At first I tried to launch the compiler with musl dynamic loader: $ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/path/to/musl/lib /path/to/musl/lib/ld-musl-x86_64.so.1 /path/to/llvm/bin/clang -v clang version 4.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm-mirror/clang 40adebeca0f99006d407508653c2cbd270a1a51c) (https://github.com/llvm-mirror/llvm
2019 Mar 25
3
Trying to create a pure LLVM toolchain on musl based distribution
Hello, I'm trying to create a pure LLVM toolchain (that will not depend on GNU and produce GNU-free code too) on a musl based distribution. For now, I use gcc to bootstrap and build all LLVM components. I do it individually because I was running out of space and memory trying to build all using LLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS. Also, I don't want to create a all-in-one package. Then, once