similar to: Why my messages are filtered from the list?

Now I am getting confused. I see two postings from me in the archives: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2015-May/071205.html https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2015-April/070982.html Were these actually published to the list? If so - big apology. Regards, Ivan On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 12:43 AM David Winsemius <dwinsemius at comcast.net> wrote: > > On May 28, 2015, at 9:11

On May 28, 2015, at 9:11 PM, Ivan Popivanov wrote: > Hello, > > Over the last two months I have sent two messages (same topic) to the list. > None of them showed on the list. For the first, I got a message that it is > in some queue and waiting for an administrator to look at it. Is the queue > THAT long?! The moderators don't know all the spam rules but we are fairly sure

Hello, This turned out to be surprisingly hard for me: Let's say I have mm = matrix(as.character(seq(1,30, 1)), nrow=3); mm [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5] [,6] [,7] [,8] [,9] [,10] [1,] "1" "4" "7" "10" "13" "16" "19" "22" "25" "28" [2,] "2" "5"

Let me start with the code: library(quantmod) library(rugarch) getSymbols("SPY", from="1900-01-01") rets=na.trim(diff(log(Cl(SPY)))) tt = tail(rets["/2004-10-29"], 1000) spec = ugarchspec(variance.model=list(garchOrder=c(1,1)), mean.model=list(armaOrder=c(2,5)), distribution.model="sged") for(ii in 1:10) { ttFit = ugarchfit( spec=spec,

Hello, I have some data, and I want to generate random numbers following the distribution of this data (in other words, to generate a synthetic data set sharing the same stats as a given data set). Reading an old thread I found the following text: >If you can compute the quantile function of the distribution (i.e., the >inverse of the integral of the pdf), then you can use the

Is the only option for responding to posts in this group to receive ALL of the messages posted in this group by email?

Hello, Have been thinking that sometimes users may want each process to initialize its random seed with a specific value rather then the current seed. This could be keyed off depending whether mc.set.seed is logical, preserving the current behaviour, or numerical, using the value in a call to set.seed. Does this make sense? If you wonder how I came up with the idea: I spent a couple of hours

library(xts) library(TTR) ndx = getYahooData("^NDX") aa = ndx$Close bb = aggregate(aa, as.yearweek, tail, 1) The last operation takes forever, and then the bb dates are messed up. The following produces the desired result: time(aa) = as.Date(time(aa)) bb = aggregate(aa, as.yearweek, tail, 1) The index of ndx and aa is of POSIXct (as reported by is(time(ndx))) , which apparently

Given a dataset x, the ecdf is ecdf(x). Then I can use ecdf(x)(y) to find the percentile of y. Given the ecdf is there a way to determine what is the value of y that is the boundary of let's say 95 percentile? In other words, is there a function I can call on the ecdf like: fomeFunc( ecdf( x ), 0.95 ) Which will return the highest value of y, for which ecdf( y ) < 0.95? The only solution

Hi all, I have thoroughly read the available documentation and I can't seem to find a workaround for my setup... I'm trying to create a phone conference line that users would call using a unique phone number (no matter if they are moderators or just plain users). I use Asterisk 1.2.6 The available conferences are defined as follows: conf => 1000,user pin1, moderator pin1 conf =>

---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 30 Jun 1998 15:10:47 +0800 From: David Luyer <luyer@UCS.UWA.EDU.AU> To: BUGTRAQ@NETSPACE.ORG Subject: Serious Linux 2.0.34 security problem I just saw this mentioned on linux-kernel and confirmed it; #include <fcntl.h> #include <errno.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <unistd.h> int main(int

Hello, I am in need of moderators to help moderate each session. If you are interested, please respond to this mail and indicate which slot you can moderate. Its a long shot as you would miss talks, but if anyone wants a break to do work or check email while also staffing the registration desk, please let me know if you can do it during any of the sessions below. Thanks! Options: Moderator #1

Dear Metafor users, I''d like to test a model with 2 continuous and 2 categorical moderators in a meta regression. One categorical parameter has 2 levels and the other has 4 levels. If I understand correctly, when I include all moderators in the model, Metafor returns main effects of the continuous parameters and contrasts of each level of categorical moderators with the intercept (which

I'm still in need for moderators for the following sessions: > Moderator #3 (11:15-12:45, Regency 1) > Verified LLVM: Formalizing the semantics of the LLVM Intermediate Representation for Verified Program Transformations- Santosh Nagarakatte, University of Pennsylvania/Rutgers University > Integrated Security, using LLVM for Dynamic and Static Security Tasks- Jared Carlson,

hi, ?m studying moderated effects of percieved social support and justice world belief on relationship between stress coping strategies and depression level. ? haver never run this analysis before soi ? want to check my steps whether correct or not. first ? run regression in step 1 centered independent variables and centered moderators in step2 two way interactions instep 3 three way

Hey! Open message <http://thekalyanacentre.com/paid.php?a> r0m30 at r0m30.com

My question is how have people implemented different types of users in their Web applications using user-engine? As for my application, I use single table inheritance in order to derive several different types of users, such as "moderators," "editors," etc ... For example, let''s say that I want to create a moderator. I define a new moderator class and Controller like

The list moderator has not updated email address from previous employer. i can not post to r-help. Is there a way around this? Anupam. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

It looks like Mark and others have addressed the development/CVS issues. We should let their plan be put into effect and give it a chance to work. Regarding the email list: A number of people have suggested creating more email lists. I think this is not a good idea because there will be even more cross posting than there is now between -dev and -users. Several years ago I was a moderator on the

Hello metafor users, I'm using metafor to perform a single-effect summary estimate of the raw proportion of patients experiencing a post-operative complication, and I'm interested in seeing if this proportion differs between the three most commonly used surgical techniques. The software is working as expected, but I would like to double check on the interpretation of my mixed-effect model